Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-sv6ng Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-08T03:05:10.479Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Employing native-English-speaking teachers in China: Benefits, problems and solutions

Providing native-English-speaking teachers with a local pre-service training program and adopting a team teaching approach are essential for enhancing their efficiency in the Chinese EFL context

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 December 2015

Zhenhui Rao  and
Hua Yuan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The beginning of this new century has witnessed two important events in English language education in China. The first is the expansion of English language education into the primary curriculum. In 2001, the Chinese Ministry of Education (MOE) required that primary schools located in cities and county seats start to offer English classes at Primary 3 from the autumn of 2001 and that the rest start to do so in the following year (MOE, 2001). The second is the increase of enrolment in various types of Chinese colleges and universities. For example, in 1999 the number of students enrolled in Chinese higher education was six million, but it rose to over 20 million in 2004 (Jin & Cortazzi, 2006). Such a rapid development of English language education has resulted in a number of difficulties and challenges for EFL teaching in China, but the most serious constraint comes from the lack of qualified teachers (Rao, 2010). To compensate for the shortage of English teachers, many Chinese schools are endeavoring to attract more native-English-speaking teachers (henceforth NESTs) to fill up EFL teaching vacancies. In 2006, for example, there were 150,000 foreign EFL teachers working in China (Jeon & Lee, 2006).

Type
Research Article
Information
English Today , Volume 32 , Issue 4 , December 2016 , pp. 12 - 18
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brutt-Griffler, J. & Samimy, K. 1999. ‘Revisiting the colonial in the post-colonial: Critical praxis for nonnative-English-speaking teachers in a TESOL program.’ TESOL Quarterly, 33(3), 413–433.Google Scholar
Carrier, K. A. 2003. ‘NNS teacher trainees in Western-based TESOL programs.’ ELT Journal, 57(3), 242–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carless, D. & Walker, E. 2006. ‘Effective team teaching between local and native-speaking English teachers.’ Language and Education, 20(6), 463–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chun, S. Y. 2014. ‘EFL learners’ beliefs about native and non-native English-speaking teachers: perceived strengths, weaknesses, and preferences.’ Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 35(6), 563–579.Google Scholar
Cook, G. 2010. Translation in Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Govardhan, A., Nayar, B. & Sheorey, R. 1999. ‘Do U.S. master programs prepare students to teach abroad?’ TESOL Quarterly, 33(1), 114–125.Google Scholar
Jeon, M. & Lee, J. 2006. ‘Hiring native-speaking English teachers in East Asian countries.’ English Today, 22(4), 53–58.Google Scholar
Jin, J. 2005. ‘Which is better in China, a local or a native English-speaking teacher?’ English Today, 83(3), 39–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jin, L. & Cortazzi, M. 2006. ‘Changing practice in Chinese cultures of learning.’ Language, Culture and Curriculum, 19(1), 5–20.Google Scholar
Keefe, J. 1987. Learning Style Theory and Practice. Reston, Virginia: NASSP.Google Scholar
Liu, D. 1998. ‘Ethnocentrism in TESOL: Teacher education and the neglected needs of international TESOL students.’ ELT Journal, 52(1), 3–10.Google Scholar
Ma, L. P. F. 2012a. ‘Advantages and disadvantages of native- and nonnative-English-speaking Teachers: Student perceptions in Hong Kong.’ TESOL Quarterly, 46(2), 280–305.Google Scholar
Ma, L. P. F. 2012b. ‘Strengths and weaknesses of NESTS and NNESTS: Perceptions of NNESTs in Hong Kong.’ Linguistics and Education, 23, 1–15.Google Scholar
Medgyes, P. 1992. ‘Native or non-native: who's worth more?’ ELT Journal, 46(4), 340–349.Google Scholar
MOE. 2001. Jiaoyubu guanyu jiji tuijin xiaoxue kaishe yingyu kecheng de zhidao yijian. [Guidelines for promoting primary English language teaching.] Beijing: MOE.Google Scholar
Oxford, R. L., Hollaway, M. E. & Horton-Murillo, D. 1992. ‘Language learning styles: Research and practical considerations for teaching in the multicultural tertiary ESL/EFL classroom.’ System, 20(4), 439–456.Google Scholar
Phillipson, R. 1992. Linguistic Imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rao, Z. 2010. ‘Chinese students’ perceptions of native English-speaking teachers in EFL teaching.’ Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 31(1), 55–68.Google Scholar
Tang, C. 1997. ‘The identity of the nonnative ESL teacher: On the power and status of native ESL teachers.’ TESOL Quarterly, 31(3), 577–580.Google Scholar
Vaughn, S., Schumm, J. S. & Arguelles, M. E. 1997. ‘The ABCDE's of co-teaching.’ Teaching Exceptional Children, 30(2), 4–10.Google Scholar
Widdowson, H. G. 1994. ‘The ownership of English.’ TESOL Quarterly, 28(3), 377–388.Google Scholar