Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-28T21:59:10.326Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The usage of there sentences with become: the relationship between change of state and appearance/occurrence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 June 2023

TAKASHI MINO Open the ORCID record for TAKASHI MINO [Opens in a new window]
TAKASHI MINO*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Humanities Nagasaki Junshin Catholic University Nagasaki Junshin Catholic University 235 Mitsuyamamachi Nagasaki 852-8142 Japan mino@n-junshin.ac.jp
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Numerous studies have investigated the kinds of verbs that can be used with there constructions. Generally, only existence and appearance verbs can occur in there constructions. However, some cases have been observed involving verbs not lexically expressing existence or appearance. This study focuses on there sentences with the verb become which are noteworthy in the following two respects. First, although the verb become is not an existence or appearance verb but a change-of-state verb, the verb is felicitously used with there constructions. Second, become is used without an adjectival or nominal complement, a unique argument realization pattern of the verb not found in other syntactic contexts. This study, based on a detailed examination of actual data in corpora, claims that there sentences with become express the appearance/occurrence of an entity. Although the postverbal noun is structurally a subject in there constructions and the subject of the verb become is usually interpreted as an entity undergoing a change, the postverbal noun of there sentences with become is an entity that has arisen as a result of the changing event.

Keywords

there constructionsbecomecoercionsemanticscorpus
Type
Research Article
Information
English Language & Linguistics , Volume 28 , Issue 1 , March 2024 , pp. 1 - 21
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I thank the two anonymous reviewers and the editor for their constructive comments. All remaining errors and shortcomings are, of course, my own. This study was supported by JPSP KAKENHI Grant Number 21K20003.

References

References

Aissen, Judith. 1975. Presentational-there insertion: A cyclic root transformation. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (CLS) 11, 1–14.Google Scholar
Audring, Jenny & Booij, Geert. 2016. Cooperation and coercion. Linguistics 54, 617–37.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward. 1999. Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight. 1977. Meaning and form. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Brandt, Patrick. 2003. Cipient predication: Unifying double object, dative experiencer and existential/presentational constructions. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Breivik, Leiv E. 1990. Existential there: A synchronic and diachronic study, 2nd edn. Oslo: Novus Press.Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan. 1994. Locative inversion and the architecture of universal grammar. Language 70, 72–131.Google Scholar
Deal, Amy R. 2009. The origin and content of expletives: Evidence from selection. Syntax 12, 285–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffley, Patrick. 2020. Linguistic meaning meets linguistic form. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Erdmann, Peter. 1990. Discourse and grammar: Focussing and defocussing in English. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Hannay, Michael. 1985. English existentials in functional grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingria, Robert J. P. & George, Leland M.. 1993. Adjectives, nominals, and the status of arguments. In Pustejovsky, Dans J. (ed.), Semantics and the lexicon, 107–27. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Irwin, Patricia. 2012. Unaccusativity at the interfaces. PhD dissertation, New York University.Google Scholar
Jenset, Gard B. 2010. A corpus-based study on the evolution of there: Statistical analysis and cognitive interpretation. PhD dissertation, University of Bergen.Google Scholar
Johansson, Stig. 1997. A corpus study of English existential clauses: Register variation and discourse function. In Nevalainen, Terttu & Kahlas-Tarkka, Leena (eds.), To explain the present: Studies in the changing English language in honour of Matti Rissanen, 303–18. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard S. 1979. Rightward NP movement in French and English. Linguistic Inquiry 10, 710–19.Google Scholar
Kemenade, van Ans. 1997. V2 and embedded topicalization in Old and Middle English. In Kemenade, Ans van & Vincent, Nigel B. (eds.), Parameters of morphosyntactic change, 326–51. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kuno, Susumu & Takami, Kenichi. 2004. Functional constraints in grammar: On the unergative–unaccusative distinction. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Kuzar, Ron. 2012. Sentence patterns in English and Hebrew. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, fire and dangerous things: What categorizations reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth. 1993. English verb classes and alternation: A preliminary investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth & Hovav, Malka Rappaport. 1995. Unaccusativity: At the syntax–lexical semantics interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Li, Bo. 2017. Constructional hierarchy and features of the there construction. Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research 32, 728–35.Google Scholar
Lumsden, Michael. 1988. Existential sentences: Their structure and meaning. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Martínez Insua, Ana E. 2004. Existential there-constructions in contemporary British English: A corpus-driven analysis of their use in speech and writing. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Milsark, Gary L. 1979. Existential sentences in English. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Mino, Takashi. 2020. A constructional analysis of there sentences with non-be verbs. PhD dissertation, Osaka University.Google Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick J. 1987. Presentational there-insertion and the notions ‘root transformation’ and ‘stylistic rule’. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (CLS) 23, 295–308.Google Scholar
Pérez-Guerra, Javier. 1999. Historical English syntax: A statistical corpus-based study on the organisation of early modern English sentences. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sydney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Rochemont, Michael S. & Culicover, Peter W.. 1990. English focus construction and the theory of grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ross, John R. 1974. There, there, (there, (there, (there,…))). Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (CLS) 10, 569–87.Google Scholar
Stowell, Tim. 1978. What was there before there was there? Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (CLS) 14, 458–71.Google Scholar
Szekely, Rachel. 2015. Truth without predication: The role of placing in the existential there-sentence. New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wasow, Thomas. 1977. Transformation and the lexicon. In Culicover, Peter W., Wasow, Thomas & Akmajian, Adrian (eds.), Formal syntax, 327–60. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Yaguchi, Michiko. 2017. Existential sentences from the diachronic and synchronic perspectives: A descriptive approach. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar
Davies, Mark. 2004–. British National Corpus (from Oxford University Press). Available online at www.english-corpora.org/bnc/ (last accessed 20 December 2021).Google Scholar
Davies, Mark. 2008–. The Corpus of Contemporary American English. Available online at www.english-corpora.org/coca/ (last accessed 20 December 2021).Google Scholar
Davies, Mark. 2010–. The Corpus of Historical American English. Available online at www.english-corpora.org/coha/ (last accessed 20 December 2021).Google Scholar
Davies, Mark. 2011–. Google Books Corpus (based on Google Books n-grams). Available online at www.english-corpora.org/googlebooks/ (last accessed 10 November 2021).Google Scholar
Davies, Mark. 2018–. The iWeb Corpus. Available online at www.english-corpora.org/iWeb/ (last accessed 20 December 2021).Google Scholar
Davies, Mark. 2016–. Corpus of News on the Web (NOW). Available online at www.english-corpora.org/now/ (last accessed 20 December 2021).Google Scholar
Davies, Mark. 2019a–. The Movie Corpus. Available online at www.english-corpora.org/movies/ (last accessed 20 December 2021).Google Scholar
Davies, Mark. 2019b–. The TV Corpus. Available online at www.english-corpora.org/tv/ (last accessed 20 December 2021).Google Scholar
Davies, Mark. 2019c–. The Coronavirus Corpus. Available online at www.english-corpora.org/corona/ (last accessed 20 December 2021).Google Scholar
WB: The Wordbanks Available online at scnweb.japanknowledge.com/WBO2/ (last accessed 20 December 2021)Google Scholar
Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English, 6th edn. 2014. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary, 9th edn. 2015. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary, 2nd edn. 1989. OED Online, 2000–. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Davies, Mark. 2004–. British National Corpus (from Oxford University Press). Available online at www.english-corpora.org/bnc/ (last accessed 20 December 2021).Google Scholar
Davies, Mark. 2008–. The Corpus of Contemporary American English. Available online at www.english-corpora.org/coca/ (last accessed 20 December 2021).Google Scholar
Davies, Mark. 2010–. The Corpus of Historical American English. Available online at www.english-corpora.org/coha/ (last accessed 20 December 2021).Google Scholar
Davies, Mark. 2011–. Google Books Corpus (based on Google Books n-grams). Available online at www.english-corpora.org/googlebooks/ (last accessed 10 November 2021).Google Scholar
Davies, Mark. 2018–. The iWeb Corpus. Available online at www.english-corpora.org/iWeb/ (last accessed 20 December 2021).Google Scholar
Davies, Mark. 2016–. Corpus of News on the Web (NOW). Available online at www.english-corpora.org/now/ (last accessed 20 December 2021).Google Scholar
Davies, Mark. 2019a–. The Movie Corpus. Available online at www.english-corpora.org/movies/ (last accessed 20 December 2021).Google Scholar
Davies, Mark. 2019b–. The TV Corpus. Available online at www.english-corpora.org/tv/ (last accessed 20 December 2021).Google Scholar
Davies, Mark. 2019c–. The Coronavirus Corpus. Available online at www.english-corpora.org/corona/ (last accessed 20 December 2021).Google Scholar
WB: The Wordbanks Available online at scnweb.japanknowledge.com/WBO2/ (last accessed 20 December 2021)Google Scholar
Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English, 6th edn. 2014. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary, 9th edn. 2015. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary, 2nd edn. 1989. OED Online, 2000–. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English, 6th edn. 2014. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary, 9th edn. 2015. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary, 2nd edn. 1989. OED Online, 2000–. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar