Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T06:28:01.564Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Private and Public Preferences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2008

Timur Kuran
Timur Kuran
Affiliation:
University of Southern California
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The theory of revealed preference, which lies at the core of the neoclassical economic method, asserts that people's preference orderings are revealed by their actions. This assertion has two possible meanings, of which one is a truism and the other false. When a person joins a riot against the government, he reveals through this action that he would rather riot than not. This is the sense in which the assertion is a truism. But if one means that the person must want a change of government, this is certainly false. His decision to riot could mean only that he considers it dangerous to stay on the sidelines.

Type
Essays
Information
Economics & Philosophy , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , April 1990 , pp. 1 - 26
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allport, Gordon W. 1937. Personality: A Psychological Interpretation. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1963 (1965). On Revolution. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Argyle, Michael. 1957. “Social Pressure in Public and Private Situations”. journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 54:172–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arthur, W. Brian. 1989. “Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-In by Historical Events”. Economic Journal 99:116–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asch, Solomon E. 1951 (1963). “Effects of Group Pressure upon the Modification and Distortion of Judgments”. In Groups, Leadership and Men, edited by Guetzkow, Harold, pp.177–90. New York: Russell and Russell.Google Scholar
Asch, Solomon E. 1956. “Studies of Independence and Conformity: I. A Minority of One against a Unanimous Majority”. Psychological Monographs 70, no. 416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Back, Kurt W., and Bogdanoff, Morton D. 1964. “Plasma Lipid Responses to Leadership, Conformity, and Deviation”. In Psychobiological Approaches to Human Behavior, edited by Leiderman, P. Herbert and Shapiro, David, pp. 24–42. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Becker, Gary. 1976. The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borden, Richard I. 1980. “Audience Influence”. In Psychology of Group Influence, edited by Paulus, Paul B., pp. 99–131. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Brennan, Geoffrey, and Lomasky, Loren. 1985. “The Impartial Spectator Goes to Washington: Toward a Smithian Theory of Electoral Behavior”. Economics and Philosophy 1:189–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Creel, H. G. 1949 (1960). Confucius and the Chinese Way. New York: Harper Torchbooks.Google Scholar
Deaton, Angus, and Muellbauer, John. 1980. Economics and Consumer Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deutsch, Morton, and Gerard, Harold B. 1955. “A Study of Normative and Informational Social Influences upon Individual Judgment”. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 51:629–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dittes, James E., and Kelley, Harold. 1956. “Effect of Different Conditions of Acceptance upon Conformity to Group Norms”. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 53:100–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Émile. 1897 (1951). Suicide: A Study in Sociology, translated by Spaulding, John A. and Simpson, George. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. 1979. Ulysses and the Sirens: Studies in Rationality and Irrationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. 1983. Sour Grapes: Studies in the Subversion of Rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, Jon. (editor). 1986. The Multiple Self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Feldman, Martha S., and March, James G. 1981. “Information in Organizations as Signal and Symbol”. Administrative Science Quarterly 26:171–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, Robert H. 1985. Choosing the Right Pond: Human Behavior and the Quest for Status. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. 1922 (1961). Beyond the Pleasure Principle, translated by Strachey, James. New York: Norton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. 1923 (1961). The Ego and the Id, translated by Strachey, James. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. 1930 (1961). Civilization and Its Discontents, translated by Strachey, James. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Fromm, Erich. 1947 (1975). Man for Himself: An Inquiry into the Psychology of Ethics. New York: Fawcett Premier.Google Scholar
Gergen, David A. 1986. “Secrecy Means Big Things Get Little Thought”. Los Angeles Times, 11 27, pt. 2.Google Scholar
Hampshire, Stuart. 1983. Morality and Conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Heikal, Mohammed. 1981 (1982). Iran: The Untold Story. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Hess, Stephen. 1984. The Government/Press Connection: Press Officers and Their Offices. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Hirschman, Albert O. 1970. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Horney, Karen. 1950. Neurosis and Human Growth: The Struggle toward Self-Realization. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1785 (1950). Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals, translated by Paton, H. J. as The Moral Law. New York: Barnes and Noble.Google Scholar
Keddie, Nikki. 1963. “Symbol and Sincerity in Islam”. Studia Islamica 19:27–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuran, Timur. 1987a. “Chameleon Voters and Public Choice”. Public Choice 53:53–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuran, Timur. 1987b. “Preference Falsification, Policy Continuity and Collective Conservatism”.Economic Journal 97:642–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuran, Timur. 1988. “The Tenacious Past: Theories of Personal and Collective Conservatism”. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 10:143–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuran, Timur. 1989a. “Sparks and Prairie Fires: A Theory of Unanticipated Political Revolution”. Public Choice 61:41–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuran, Timur. 1989b. “Cognitive Limitations and Preference Evolution”. Unpublished paper. University of Southern California.Google Scholar
Le Bon, Gustave. 1895 (1896). The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Leibenstein, Harvey. 1950. “Bandwagon, Snob, and Veblen Effects in the Theory of Consumers' Demand”. Quarterly Journal of Economics 64:183–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machiavelli, Niccolò. 1532 (1947). The Prince, translated and edited by Bergin, Thomas G.. Northbrook, IL: AHM Publishing.Google Scholar
Margolis, Howard. 1982. Selfishness, Altruism and Rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Maslow, Abraham H. 1954 (1987). Motivation and Personality, 3rd. ed.New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Milgram, Stanley. 1974. Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Moore, Barrington Jr., 1978. Injustice: The Social Bases of Obedience and Revolt. White Plains, NY: M. E. Sharpe.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moscovici, Serge. 1985. “Social Influence and Conformity”. In The Handbook of Social Psychology, 3rd. ed., vol. 2, edited by Lindzey, Gardner and Aronson, Elliot, pp. 347–412. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Moscovici, Serge, and Personnaz, Bernard. 1980. “Studies in Social Influence: V. Minority Influence and Conversion Behavior in a Perceptual Task”. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 16:270–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noelle-Neumann, Elisabeth. 1980 (1984). The Spiral of Silence: Public Opinion - Our Social Skin. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Peltason, J. W. 1961. Fifty-Eight Lonely Men: Southern Federal Judges and School Desegregation. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar
Penz, G. Peter. 1986. Consumer Sovereignty and Human Interests. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plato, 4th c. B.C. (1945). The Republic, translated by Cornford, Francis M.. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pressman, Jeffrey L., and Wildavsky, Aaron B. 1973. Implementation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Quandt, William B. 1986. Camp David: Peacemaking and Politics. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Raven, Bertram H. 1959. “Social Influence on Opinions and the Communication of Related Content”. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 58:119–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ross, Lee, Bierbrauer, Günter, and Hoffman, Susan. 1976. “The Role of Attribution Processes in Conformity and Dissent: Revisiting the Asch Situation”. American Psychologist 31:148–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, Cecil. 1932. A History of the Marranos. Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society of America.Google Scholar
Samuelson, Paul A. 1938. “A Note on the Pure Theory of Consumer Behavior”. Economica 5:61–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuelson, Paul A., and Nordhaus, William D. 1948 (1989). Economics, 13th ed.New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Schelling, Thomas. 1984. Choice and Consequence: The Perspectives of an Errant Economist. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, James C. 1985. Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, John F. 1971. Internalization of Norms: A Sociological Theory of Moral Commitment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Sherif, Muzafer, 1935. “A Study of Some Social Factors in Perception”. Archives of Psychology 27, no. 187.Google Scholar
Simon, Herbert A. 1956. “Rational Choice and the Structure of the Environment”. Psychological Review 63:129–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simon, Herbert A. 1983. Reason in Human Affairs. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. 1759 (1976). The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stigler, George J., and Becker, Gary. 1977. “De Gustibus Non Est Disputandum”. American Economic Review 67:76–90.Google Scholar
Tarde, Gabriel. 1890 (1903). The Laws of Imitation, translated by Parsons, Elsie C.. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Taylor, D. Garth. 1986. Public Opinion and Collective Action: The Boston School Desegregation Conflict. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Totman, Richard. 1979. Social Causes of Illness. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Uhlaner, Carole J., and Grofman, Bernard. 1986. “The Race May Be Close, but My Horse Is Going to Win: Wish Fulfillment in the 1980 Presidential Election”. Political Behavior 8:101–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Grunebaum, Gustave E. 1946 (1953). Medieval Islam: A Study in Cultural Orientation, 2nd ed.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar