Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-27T21:18:50.665Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Diamond and Daniels on Medical Rationing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2008

Walter Glannon
Walter Glannon
Affiliation:
Institute for Ethics, American Medical Association
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Comments
Information
Economics & Philosophy , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , April 1999 , pp. 119 - 125
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Daniels, Norman. 1998. ‘Rationing medical care — a philosopher's perspective on outcomes and process’. Symposium on the Rationing of Health Care, 2. Economics and Philosophy, 14:27–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniels, Norman, and Sabin, James. 1997. ‘Limits to health care: fair procedures, democratic deliberation, and the legitimacy problem for insurers’. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 26:303–50CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diamond, Peter. 1998. ‘Rationing medical care – an economist's perspective’. Symposium on the Rationing of Health Care, 1. Economics and Philosophy, 14:1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, Thomas. 1979. ‘Equality’. In his Mortal Questions, pp. 106–27. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Parfit, Derek. 1995. ‘Equality or Priority?’ Lindley Lecture. University of Kansas PressGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Belknap Harvard University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roemer, John. 1993. ‘A pragmatic theory of responsibility for the egalitarian planner’. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 22:146–66Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. M. 1995. ‘The Significance of Choice.’ In Equal Freedom, pp. 39–104. Darwall, Stephen (ed.). University of Michigan PressGoogle Scholar
Temkin, Larry. 1993. Inequality. Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar