Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-nptnm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-10T05:41:13.534Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rejoinder - Error in Economics. Towards a More Evidence-Based Methodology, Julian Reiss, Routledge, 2007, xxiv + 246 pages.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2009

Julian Reiss
Julian Reiss*
Affiliation:
Erasmus University Rotterdam
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews Symposium
Information
Economics & Philosophy , Volume 25 , Issue 2 , July 2009 , pp. 210 - 215
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Mayo, D. G. 1996. Error and the Growth of Experimental Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayo, D. G. and Spanos, A. 2004. Methodology in practice: statistical misspecification testing. Philosophy of Science 71: 1007–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayo, D. G. and Spanos, A. 2006. Severe testing as a basic concept in a Neyman–Pearson philosophy of induction. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57: 323–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricardo, D. 1817. Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. Vol. 1 of The Collected Works of Davie Ricardo, ed. Sraffa, P. and Cambridge:, M. Dobb.Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Spanos, A. 1986. Statistical Foundations of Econometric Modelling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spanos, A. 1995. On theory testing in econometrics: modeling with nonexperimental data. Journal of Econometrics 67: 189–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spanos, A. 2006. Econometrics in retrospect and prospect. In New Palgrave Handbook of Econometrics, Vol. 1, ed. Mills, T. C. and Patterson, K.. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Student 1931. The Lancashire milk experiment. Biometrika 23: 398–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teira, D. Forthcoming. Why Friedman's methodology did not generate consensus among economists? Journal of the History of Economic Thought.Google Scholar