Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T01:59:28.647Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

COMMENTARIES ON “Unit Root Testing in Practice: Dealing with Uncertainty over the Trend and Initial Condition,” by David I. Harvey, Stephen J. Leybourne, and A.M. Robert Taylor

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Zhijie Xiao
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Article Commentary
Information
Econometric Theory , Volume 25 , Issue 3 , June 2009 , pp. 654 - 657
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Guggenberger, P. (2007) The Impact of a Hausman Pretest on the Size of Hypothesis Tests. Working paper, UCLA.10.2139/ssrn.1126333Google Scholar
Hansen, B. (1995) Rethinking the univariate approach to unit root testing. Econometric Theory 11, 1148–1171.10.1017/S0266466600009993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kabaila, P. (1995) The effect of model selection on confidence regions and prediction regions. Econometric Theory 11, 537–549.10.1017/S0266466600009403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leeb, H. & Pötscher, B.M. (2005) Model selection and inference: Facts and fiction. Econometric Theory 21, 21–59.10.1017/S0266466605050036Google Scholar
Phillips, P.C.B. & Ploberger, W. (1994) Posterior odds testing for a unit root with data-based model selection. Econometric Theory 10, 774–808.10.1017/S026646660000877XGoogle Scholar