Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T10:43:52.105Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

XXIII.—The Life Histories and Ecology of Two Species of Petrobius Leach, P. brevistylis and P. maritimus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

M. J. Delany
M. J. Delany*
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Glasgow.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

The life history of Petrobius brevistylis Carpenter is described from material reared in the laboratory and captured in the field (south Devonshire). A method of identifying the first eight instars is discussed and their diagnostic morphological characters described. Fecundity and time of oviposition are considered at some length. The effects of climate on various phases of the life history are considered as well as the faunas found associated with P. brevistylis. A brief description of the life history of P. maritimus (Leach) is included.

Type
Research Article
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 63 , Issue 3 , 1959 , pp. 501 - 533
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1959

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

Department of Zoology, The University, Southampton.

*

This paper was assisted in publication by a grant from the Carnegie Trust for the Universities of Scotland.

References

References to Literature

Agrell, I., 1944. “Die schwedischen Thysanuren”, Opuse. Ent., 9, 23–36.Google Scholar
Aitchison, J., and Silvey, S. D., 1957. “The Generalisation of Probit Analysis to the Case of Multiple Responses,” Biometrika, 44, 131–140.Google Scholar
Bagnall, R. S., 1915. “On some British Machilidæ (Thysanura)”, J. Econ. Biol., 10, 83–85.Google Scholar
Bär, H., 1912. “Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Thysanura”, Jena. Z. Naturw., 48, 1–92.Google Scholar
Carpenter, G. H., 1913. “The Irish Species of Petrobius”, Irish Nat., 22, 228–233.Google Scholar
Delany, M. J., 1953 a. “A Revision of the British Thysanura”, Ent. Mon. Mag., 89, 144–145.Google Scholar
Delany, M. J., 1953 b. “Studies on the Microclimate of Calluna Heathland”, J. Anim. Ecol., 22, 227–239.Google Scholar
Delany, M. J., 1954 a. “The Habitats of the Bristletail Petrobius maritimus (Insecta, Thysanura) on Lundy”, Rep. Lundy Fid. Soc, 7, 36–44.Google Scholar
Delany, M. J., 1954 b. “Studies on the Life History and Ecology of Dilta littoralis (Womersley 1930) (Thysanura, Machilidæ)”, Trans. R. Ent. Soc. Lona., 105, 31–63.Google Scholar
Delany, M. J., 1956a. “The Animal Communities of Three Areas of Pioneer Heath in South-west England”, J. Anim. Ecol., 25, 113–127.Google Scholar
Delany, M. J., 1956 b. “An Aberrant Male of Petrobius brevistylis Carp. (Thysanura, Machilidæ)”, Ent. Mon. Mag., 92, 129–130.Google Scholar
Dénis, R., 1949. “Sous-class des Apterygotes”, Traité de Zoologie, 9, 111–275. Masson, Paris.Google Scholar
Dyar, H. G., 1890. “The Number of Moults in Lepidopterous Larvæ”, Psyche, Camb., Mass., 5, 420–422.Google Scholar
Janetschek, H., 1954. “Uber mitteleuropäische Felenspringer (Ins., Thysanura)”, Ost. Zool. Z., 5, 281–328.Google Scholar
Kratochvil, J., 1945. “Naše šupinušky se zvláštením zřetelem na moravská chráněná území”, Folia Ent., Brno, 8, 41–67.Google Scholar
Leach, W. E., 1809. “Entomology”, Brewster's Edinburgh Encyclopœdia, 9, 57–172. (Only edition dated 1830 has been seen.)Google Scholar
Leach, W. E., 1817. “On the Families, Stirpes, and Genera of the Order Thysanura”, Zool. Misc., 3, 61–63.Google Scholar
Lindsay, E., 1940. “The Biology of the Silverfish, Ctenolepisma longicaudata Esch. with Particular Reference to its Feeding Habits”, Proc. Roy. Soc. Viet., 52, 35–83.Google Scholar
Oudemans, J. T., 1888. “Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Thysanura and Collembola”, Bijdr. Dierk., 16, 147–226.Google Scholar
Przibram, H., and Werber, E. L., 1907. “Regenerationversuche allgemeiner Bedeutung bei Borstenschwänzen (Lepismatidæ)”, Arch. EntwMech. Org., 23, 615–631.Google Scholar
Reilly, A. J., 1915. “Notes on the British Machilidæ with Descriptions of Two New Species”, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., 16, 10–15.Google Scholar
Remington, C. L., 1954. “The Suprageneric Classification of the Order Thysanura (Insecta)”, Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer., 47, 277–286.Google Scholar
Richards, O. W., and Waloff, N., 1954. “Studies on the Biology and Population Dynamics of British Grasshoppers”, Anti-Locust Bull., 17, 1–184.Google Scholar
Sahrhage, D., 1953. “Ökologische Untersuchungen an Thermobia domestica (Pack.) und Lepisma saccharina L.”, Z. Wiss. Zool., 157, 77–168.Google Scholar
Silvestri, E., 1911. “Contributo alla conoscenza dei Machilidæ dell'America settentrionale”, Boll. Lab. Zool. Portici, 5, 324–350.Google Scholar
Simpson, G. G., and Roe, A., 1939. Quantitative Zoology. McGraw Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Stach, J., 1923. “Petrobius balticus, eine neue Art aus Pommern, Zugleich das erste kurze Verzeichnis der dortigen Collembolen”, Rozp. Mus. Dzied., 7–8, 1–22. (Original not seen.)Google Scholar
Sweetman, H. L., 1938. “Physical Ecology of the Fire Brat, Thermobia domestica Pack.”, Ecol. Monogr., 8, 288–311.Google Scholar
Tillyard, R. J., 1932. “Origin of Insects from Crustacea”, Nature, Lond., 129, 828–829.Google Scholar
Verhoeff, K. W., 1910 a. “Über Felsenspringer, Machiloidea. 3. Aufsatz: Die Entwicklungsstufen”, Zool. Am., 36, 385–399.Google Scholar
Verhoeff, K. W., 1910 b. “Über Felsenspringer, Machiloidea. 4. Aufsatz: Systematik und Orthomorphose”, Zool. Am., 36, 425–438.Google Scholar
Willem, V., 1924. “Observations sur Machilis maritima”, Bull. Biol., 58, 306–320.Google Scholar
Witherby, H. F., et al., 1938. The Handbook of British Birds. Witherby, London.Google Scholar
Womersley, H., 1927. “A New British Species of Petrobius (Leach)”, Ent. Mon. Mag., 63, 231–233.Google Scholar
Wygodzinsky, P. W., 1941. “Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Dipluren und Thysanuren der Schweiz”, Denkschr. Schweiz. Naturf. Ges., 74, 113–227.Google Scholar