Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T02:35:59.441Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Confucian Enlightenment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2015

Eske J. Møllgaard
Eske J. Møllgaard*
Affiliation:
Department of East Asian, Languages and Civilizations, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Early China , Volume 19 , 1994 , pp. 145 - 160
Copyright
Copyright © Society for the Study of Early China 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. For the last three quotations Roetz refers to Hall and Ames, Thinking Through Confucius (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1987), 43Google Scholar; Rosemont, Henry, “Kierkegaard and Confucius: On Finding the Way,’ Philosophy East and West 36.3 (1986), 208–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and Fingarette, Herbert, “Reason, Spontaneity, and the Li: A Confucian Critique of Graham's Solution to the Problem of Fact and Value,’ in Chinese Texts and Philosophiml Contexts: Essays Dedicated to Angus C. Graham, ed. Rosemont, Heniy (La Salle: Open Court, 1991), 218Google Scholar.

2. For Roetz's more detailed critique of Hansen, see “Validity in Chou Thought: On Chad Hansen and the Pragmatic Turn in Sinology,’ in Epistemological Issues in Classical Chinese Philosophy, eds. Lenk, Hans and Paul, Gregor (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1993), 69–112Google Scholar.

3. Except where noted all translations are by Roetz.

4. Schwartz, Benjamin, The World Of Thought in Ancient China (Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Belknap Press, 1985), 68Google Scholar.

5. It is possible that something like a procedure of application is implied in the passage from the “Zidao” chapter of the Xunzi quoted above. Roetz does not refer to that passage in his discussion of the application of postconventional morality.

6. Fingarette, Herbert, “Reason, Spontaneity, and the Li,” 219Google Scholar.

7. See Yearley, Lee H., Mencius and Aquinas: Theories of Virtue and Conceptions of Courage (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1990), 17 and 20Google Scholar.

8. Williams, Bernard, Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1985), 29Google Scholar.