Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-4hvwz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T09:59:58.590Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Measuring Evidence-Based Viral Respiratory Illness Mitigation Behaviors in Pregnant Populations: Development and Validation of a Short, Single-Factor Scale During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 May 2022

Mackenzie D.M. Whipps Open the ORCID record for Mackenzie D.M. Whipps [Opens in a new window] ,
Jennifer E. Phipps Open the ORCID record for Jennifer E. Phipps [Opens in a new window]  and
Leigh Ann Simmons
Mackenzie D.M. Whipps*
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis, Department of Human Ecology, Perinatal Origins of Disparities Center, Davis, CA, USA
Jennifer E. Phipps
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis, Department of Human Ecology, Perinatal Origins of Disparities Center, Davis, CA, USA
Leigh Ann Simmons
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis, Department of Human Ecology, Perinatal Origins of Disparities Center, Davis, CA, USA
*
Corresponding author: Mackenzie D.M. Whipps, Email: mdwhipps@ucdavis.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

Researchers and public health professionals need to better understand individual engagement in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mitigation behaviors to reduce the human and societal costs of the current pandemic and prepare for future respiratory pandemics. We suggest that developing measures of individual mitigation behaviors and testing them among high-risk individuals, including pregnant people, may help to reduce overall morbidity and mortality by quickly identifying targets for messaging around mitigation until sufficient vaccination uptake is reached.

Methods:

We surveyed pregnant people in California over 2 waves of the COVID-19 pandemic to explore mitigation behaviors. We developed and validated a novel Viral Respiratory Illness Mitigation Scale (VRIMS).

Results:

Seven measures loaded onto a single factor with good psychometric properties. The overall sample scale average was high over both waves, indicating that most pregnant Californians engaged in most of the strategies most of the time. Older participants, minoritized participants, those living in more urban contexts, and those surveyed during a surge reported engaging in these strategies most frequently.

Conclusions:

Clinicians and researchers should consider using reliable, validated measures like the VRIMS to identify individuals and communities that may benefit from additional education on reducing risk for COVID-19, future respiratory pandemics, or even seasonal flu.

Keywords

COVID-19pregnancymitigationinfectious disease transmissionhealth communication
Type
Original Research
Information
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness , Volume 17 , 2023 , e179
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cucinotta, D, Vanelli, M. WHO declares COVID-19 a pandemic. Acta Bio Medica: Atenei Parmensis. 2020;91:157. Available from: https://doi.org/10.23750%2Fabm.v91i1.9397 Google ScholarPubMed
Cho, SW. Quantifying the impact of nonpharmaceutical interventions during the COVID-19 outbreak: The case of Sweden. The Econometrics Journal. 2020;23:323-344. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/ectj/utaa025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Summers, J, Cheng, HY, Lin, HH, Barnard, LT, Kvalsvig, A, Wilson, N, et al. Potential lessons from the Taiwan and New Zealand health responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. The Lancet Regional Health-Western Pacific. 2020:100044. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanwpc.2020.100044 Google Scholar
Yan, B, Zhang, X, Wu, L, Zhu, H, Chen, B. Why do countries respond differently to COVID-19? A comparative study of Sweden, China, France, and Japan. The American Review of Public Administration. 2020;50:762-769. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0275074020942445 Google Scholar
Lewnard, JA, Lo, NC. Scientific and ethical basis for social-distancing interventions against COVID-19. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2020;20:631-633. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30190-0 Google ScholarPubMed
WHO Director-General’s opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19-5 June 2020 [Internet]. World Health Organization. [Accessed: December 1, 2020].Available from: https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19---5-june-2020 Google Scholar
COVID C. 19 (Coronavirus Disease): How to Protect Yourself and Others. Cent. Dis. Control Prev. 2020. [Accessed: December 1, 2020]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/prevent-getting-sick/prevention.html Google Scholar
Ives, M, Mandavilli, A. The coronavirus is airborne indoors. Why are we still scrubbing surfaces?. The New York Times. 2020. [Accessed August 4, 2021]. Available from: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/18/world/asia/covid-cleaning.html Google Scholar
Cheng, VC, Wong, SC, Chuang, VW, So, SY, Chen, JH, Sridhar, S, et al. The role of community-wide wearing of face mask for control of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic due to SARS-CoV-2. Journal of Infection. 2020;81:107-114. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2020.04.024 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clase, CM, Fu, EL, Joseph, M, Beale, RC, Dolovich, MB, Jardine, M, et al. Cloth masks may prevent transmission of COVID-19: An evidence-based, risk-based approach. Ann Intern Med. 2020;173:489-491. Available from: https://doi.org/10.7326/M20-2567 Google ScholarPubMed
Arden, MA, Chilcot, J. Health psychology and the coronavirus (COVID-19) global pandemic: A call for research. British Journal of Health Psychology. 2020;25:231-232. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fbjhp.12414 Google ScholarPubMed
Preis, H, Mahaffey, B, Lobel, M. Psychometric properties of the pandemic-related pregnancy stress scale (PREPS). Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2020;41:191-197. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/0167482X.2020.1801625 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silverio, SA, Davies, SM, Christiansen, P, Aparicio-García, ME, Bramante, A, Chen, P, et al. A validation of the Postpartum Specific Anxiety Scale 12-item research short-form for use during global crises with five translations. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2021;21:1-12. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03597-9 Google ScholarPubMed
Breakwell, GM, Fino, E, Jaspal, R. The COVID-19 Preventive Behaviors Index: Development and Validation in Two Samples From the United Kingdom. Eval Health Prof. 2021:163278720983416. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0163278720983416 Google Scholar
Al-Hasan, A, Yim, D, Khuntia, J. Citizens’ adherence to COVID-19 mitigation recommendations by the government: A 3-country comparative evaluation using web-based cross-sectional survey data. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2020;22:e20634. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2196/20634 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reinders Folmer, C, Brownlee, M, Fine, A, Kuiper, ME, Olthuis, E, Kooistra, EB, et al. Social Distancing in America: Understanding Long-term Adherence to Covid-19 Mitigation Recommendations. Amsterdam Law School Research Paper No. 2020-62. 2020. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3736683 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeFranza, D, Lindow, M, Harrison, K, Mishra, A, Mishra, H. Religion and reactance to COVID-19 mitigation guidelines. American Psychologist. 2020. Available from: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/amp0000717 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, MH, Gustafson, A, Maibach, EW, Ballew, MT, Bergquist, P, Kotcher, JE, et al. Mask-wearing increased after a government recommendation: A natural experiment in the US during the COVID-19 pandemic. Frontiers in Communication. 2020;5:44. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2020.00044 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nofal, AM, Cacciotti, G, Lee, N. Who complies with COVID-19 transmission mitigation behavioral guidelines?. PLOS ONE. 2020 Oct 8;15(10):e0240396. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240396 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Rooij, B, de Bruijn, AL, Reinders Folmer, C, Kooistra, E, Kuiper, ME, Brownlee, M, et al. Compliance with COVID-19 Mitigation Measures in the United States. Amsterdam Law School Research Paper No. 2020-21. 2020. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3582626 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, GT. On construct validity: issues of method and measurement. Psychological Assessment. 2005;17:396-408. Available from: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/1040-3590.17.4.396 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cronbach, LJ, Meehl, PE. Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin. 1955;52:281-302. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040957 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hagger, MS, Gucciardi, DF, Chatzisarantis, NL. On nomological validity and auxiliary assumptions: The importance of simultaneously testing effects in social cognitive theories applied to health behavior and some guidelines. Frontiers in Psychology. 2017;8:1933. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01933 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ziegler, M, Booth, T, Bensch, D. Getting entangled in the nomological net: Thoughts on validity and conceptual overlap. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. 2013;29:157-161. Available from: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1027/1015-5759/a000173 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Melo Ghisi, GL, Abdallah, F, Grace, SL, Thomas, S, Oh, P. A systematic review of patient education in cardiac patients: do they increase knowledge and promote health behavior change?. Patient Education and Counseling. 2014;95:160-174. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2014.01.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hocevar, KP, Metzger, M, Flanagin, AJ. Source credibility, expertise, and trust in health and risk messaging. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication. 2017. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.287 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shrank, WH, Patrick, AR, Brookhart, MA. Healthy user and related biases in observational studies of preventive interventions: a primer for physicians. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2011;26:546-550. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-010-1609-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Achtymichuk, KA, Johnson, JA, Al Sayah, F, Eurich, DT. Characteristics and health behaviors of diabetic patients receiving influenza vaccination. Vaccine. 2015;33:3549-3555. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.05.047 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rahmandad, H, Lim, TY, Sterman, J. Behavioral dynamics of COVID-19: estimating under-reporting, multiple waves, and adherence fatigue across 92 nations. medRxiv. 2021;2020-06. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.24.20139451 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poortinga, W. The prevalence and clustering of four major lifestyle risk factors in an English adult population. Preventive Medicine. 2007;44:124-128. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2006.10.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pronk, NP, Anderson, LH, Crain, AL, Martinson, BC, O’Connor, PJ, Sherwood, NE, et al. Meeting recommendations for multiple healthy lifestyle factors: prevalence, clustering, and predictors among adolescent, adult, and senior health plan members. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2004;27:25-33. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2004.04.022 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Villar, J, Ariff, S, Gunier, RB, Thiruvengadam, R, Rauch, S, Kholin, A, Roggero, P, Prefumo, F, Do Vale, MS, Cardona-Perez, JA, Maiz, N. Maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality among pregnant women with and without COVID-19 infection: the INTERCOVID multinational cohort study. JAMA pediatrics. 2021;175(8):817-826. Available from: https://doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.1050 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Somerville, LK, Basile, K, Dwyer, DE, Kok, J. The impact of influenza virus infection in pregnancy. Future microbiology. 2018;13:263-274. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2217/fmb-2017-0096 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olander, EK, Darwin, ZJ, Atkinson, L, Smith, DM, Gardner, B. Beyond the ‘teachable moment’–A conceptual analysis of women’s perinatal behaviour change. Women and Birth. 2016;29:e67-71. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2015.11.005 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Worthington, RL, Whittaker, TA. Scale development research: A content analysis and recommendations for best practices. The Counseling Psychologist. 2006;34:806-838. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0011000006288127 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborne, JW, Costello, AB, Kellow, JT. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis. Louisville, KY: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform; 2014: 86-99. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412995627.d8 Google Scholar
Clark, LA, Watson, D. Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment. 1995;7:309-319. Available from: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/14805-012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pett, MA, Lackey, NR, Sullivan, JJ. Making sense of factor analysis: The use of factor analysis for instrument development in health care research. Sage Publications; 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tabachnick, BG, Fidell, LS. Using multivariate statistics Boston. MA: Allyn and Bacon. 2007;5:2007.Google Scholar
Carpenter, S. Ten steps in scale development and reporting: A guide for researchers. Communication Methods and Measures. 2018;12:25-44. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2017.1396583 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaiser, HF. The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and psychological measurement. 1960;20:141-151. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F001316446002000116 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, DW. In search of underlying dimensions: The use (and abuse) of factor analysis in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2002;28:1629-1646. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F014616702237645 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costello, AB, Osborne, J. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation. 2005;10:7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.7275/jyj1-4868 Google Scholar
Hu, LT, Bentler, PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal. 1999;6:1-55. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browne, MW, Cudeck, R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research. 1992;21:230-258. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0049124192021002005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronbach, LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951;16:297-334. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bland, JM, Altman, DG. Statistics notes: Cronbach’s alpha. BMJ. 1997;314:572. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7080.572 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nunnally, JC, Bernstein, IH. Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw. 1967.Google Scholar
Streiner, DL. Starting at the beginning: an introduction to coefficient alpha and internal consistency. Journal of Personality Assessment. 2003;80:99-103. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327752JPA8001_18 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heath, PT, Le Doare, K, Khalil, A. Inclusion of pregnant women in COVID-19 vaccine development. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2020;20:1007-1008. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30638-1 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
COVID C. 19 (Coronavirus Disease): V-safe COVID-19 vaccine pregnancy registry. Cent. Dis. Control Prev. 2021. [Accessed: August 4, 2021]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/vsafepregnancyregistry.html Google Scholar
Feuer, W. Fauci says ‘no red flags’ seen in 10,000 pregnant women who’ve received Covid shots so far. CNBC News. 2021. [Accessed: February 1, 2021]. Available from: https://www.cnbc.com/2021/02/03/fauci-says-no-red-flags-seen-in-10000-pregnant-women-whove-received-covid-shots-so-far.html Google Scholar
Rosso, A, Massimi, A, Pitini, E, Nardi, A, Baccolini, V, Marzuillo, C, et al. Factors affecting the vaccination choices of pregnant women for their children: a systematic review of the literature. Human vaccines & Immunotherapeutics. 2020;16:1969-1980. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2019.1698901 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenbaum, L. Escaping Catch-22—Overcoming Covid Vaccine Hesitancy. N Engl J Med. 2021. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmms2101220 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, RM, Heesterbeek, H, Klinkenberg, D, Hollingsworth, TD. How will country-based mitigation measures influence the course of the COVID-19 epidemic?. The Lancet. 2020 Mar 21;395:931-934. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30567-5 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ebrahim, SH, Ahmed, QA, Gozzer, E, Schlagenhauf, P, Memish, ZA. Covid-19 and community mitigation strategies in a pandemic. 2020;368:m1066. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m1066 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swerdlow, DL, Finelli, L. Preparation for possible sustained transmission of 2019 novel coronavirus: lessons from previous epidemics. JAMA. 2020;323:1129-1130. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.1960 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: PDF

Whipps et al. supplementary material

Whipps et al. supplementary material

Download Whipps et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 85.2 KB