Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T07:09:54.766Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Knowledge of and Preparedness for Use of Environmental Assessments in Shelters During Disasters: Results of the 2013 State and Territorial Use of Shelter Assessments Survey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 August 2016

Miguel A. Cruz*
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Robert Stempel College of Public Health and Social Work, Florida International University, Miami, Florida
Muni Rubens
Affiliation:
Department of Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, Robert Stempel College of Public Health and Social Work, Florida International University, Miami, Florida
Stephanie J. Garcia
Affiliation:
Department of Biostatistics, Robert Stempel College of Public Health and Social Work, Florida International University, Miami, Florida;
Josephine Malilay
Affiliation:
National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
Karen L. Levin
Affiliation:
School of International and Public Affairs, Columbia University, New York, New York.
O. Dale Williams
Affiliation:
Department of Biostatistics, Robert Stempel College of Public Health and Social Work, Florida International University, Miami, Florida;
*
Correspondence and reprint requests to Miguel A. Cruz, PhD, MPH, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA (e-mail: mcruz@cdc.gov).

Abstract

Objective

Environmental health assessments of disaster shelters are critical for monitoring the living conditions of the occupants. However, knowledge and levels of utilization of these assessments have never been estimated in the United States or its territories. We aimed to conduct a cross-sectional survey to ascertain knowledge and Utilization of environmental health disaster shelter assessments.

Methods

The State and Territorial Use of Shelter Assessments Survey (STUSA) of environmental health department directors (N=56) was carried out in 2013.

Results

Survey responses were received from 55 of 56 targeted jurisdictions. Of those respondents, 92% of state jurisdictions and 100% of territories reported having knowledge about shelter assessments. However, only 40% of states and 60% of territories reported receiving formal training, and 53% of states and 50% of territories reported having operational procedures for shelter assessments. High levels of knowledge and familiarity and low levels of training and processes for operationalizing assessments were assessed.

Conclusions

Because environmental health assessments may provide useful information in disaster settings, we need to understand the barriers to their implementation. The results of these assessments may also help to validate their usefulness in protecting shelter occupants during disasters. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2017;11:11–14)

Type
Brief Reports
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Noji, E. The Public Health Consequences of Disasters. New York: Oxford Press; 1997.Google Scholar
2. Malilay, J, Heumann, M, Perrotta, D, et al. Simms. The role of applied epidemiology methods in the disaster management cycle. Am J Public Health . 2014;104(11):2092-2102. http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2014.302010.Google Scholar
3. Bayleyegn, TM, Schnall, AH, Ballou, SG, et al. Use of Community Assessments for Public Health Emergency Response (CASPERs) to rapidly assess public health issues — United States, 2003-2012. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2015;30(04):374-381. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X15004938.Google Scholar
4. Humanitarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Disaster Response - 2011 edition. The Sphere Handbook page. The Sphere Project website. http://www.sphereproject.org/handbook/. Accessed March 13, 2013.Google Scholar
5. Infection Prevention and Control for Shelters During Disasters. Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology website. http://www.apic.org/Resource_/TinyMceFileManager/Practice_Guidance/Emergency_Preparedness/Shelters_Disasters.pdf. Accessed September 25, 2013.Google Scholar
6. Guidance on Planning for Integration of Functional Needs Support Services in General Population Shelters. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) website. http://www.fema.gov/pdf/about/odic/fnss_guidance.pdf. Published November 10, 2010. Accessed April 14, 2014.Google Scholar
7. National Response Framework. Federal Emergency Management Agency website. http://www.fema.gov/national-response-framework. Accessed July 26, 2016.Google Scholar
8. Voluntary Organizations: FEMA Should More Fully Assess Organizations’ Mass Care Capabilities and Update the Red Cross Role in Catastrophic Events. Government Accountability Office website. http://www.fema.gov/national-response-framework. Accessed July 26, 2016.Google Scholar
9. Written testimony of FEMA Administrator Craig Fugate for a Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, Subcommittee on Emergency Management, Intergovernmental Relations, and the District of Columbia hearing titled “One Year Later: Examining the Ongoing Recovery from Hurricane Sandy.” Department of Homeland Security website. https://www.dhs.gov/news/2013/11/06/written-testimony-fema-administrator-senate-homeland-security-and-governmental. Published November 6, 2013. Accessed March 31, 2016.Google Scholar
10. Kalis, MA, Zaidel, BW. New emergency response training for environmental health professionals. J Environmental Health 2016;78(8):3031.Google Scholar