Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T22:13:50.565Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Impact of the Northridge Earthquake on the Mental Health of Veterans: Results From a Panel Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2013

Aram Dobalian ,
Judith A. Stein ,
Kevin C. Heslin ,
Deborah Riopelle ,
Brinda Venkatesh ,
Andrew B. Lanto ,
Barbara Simon ,
Elizabeth M. Yano  and
Lisa V. Rubenstein
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective: The 1994 earthquake that struck Northridge, California, led to the closure of the Veterans Health Administration Medical Center at Sepulveda. This article examines the earthquake's impact on the mental health of an existing cohort of veterans who had previously used the Sepulveda Veterans Health Administration Medical Center.

Methods: From 1 to 3 months after the disaster, trained interviewers made repeated attempts to contact participants by telephone to administer a repeated measures follow-up design survey based on a survey that had been done preearthquake. Postearthquake data were obtained on 1144 of 1800 (64%) male veterans for whom there were previous data. We tested a predictive latent variable path model of the relations between sociodemographic characteristics, predisaster physical and emotional health measures, and postdisaster emotional health and perceived earthquake impact.

Results: Perceived earthquake impact was predicted by predisaster emotional distress, functional limitations, and number of health conditions. Postdisaster emotional distress was predicted by preexisting emotional distress and earthquake impact. The regression coefficient from earthquake impact to postearthquake emotional distress was larger than that of the stability coefficient from preearthquake emotional distress. Postearthquake emotional distress also was affected indirectly by preearthquake emotional distress, health conditions, younger age, and lower socioeconomic status.

Conclusions: The postdisaster emotional health of veterans who experienced greater earthquake impact would have likely benefited from postdisaster intervention, regardless of their predisaster emotional health. Younger veterans and veterans with generally poor physical and emotional health were more vulnerable to greater postearthquake emotional distress. Veterans of lower socioeconomic status were disproportionately likely to experience more effects of the disaster because they had more predisaster emotional distress, more functional limitations, and a greater number of health conditions. Because many veterans use non–Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) health care providers for at least some of their health needs, future disaster planning for both VA and non-VA providers should incorporate interventions targeted at these groups.

(Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2011;5:S220-S226)

Keywords

disastersearthquakesmental healthveteranssocial classCaliforniamental disordersvulnerable populations
Type
Original Research
Information
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness , Volume 5 , Issue S2 , September 2011 , pp. S220 - S226
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Shoaf, KI, Sareen, HR, Nguyen, LH, Bourque, LB.Injuries as a result of California earthquakes in the past decade. Disasters. 1998;22 (3):218–235.Google Scholar
2.Eguchi, RT, Goltz, JD, Seligson, HA.Real-time loss estimation as an emergency response decision support system: the Early Post-Earthquake Damage Assessment Tool (EPEDAT). Earthq Spectra. 1997;13:815–832.Google Scholar
3.Stephenson, RS, DuFrane, C.Disasters and development: Part I. Relationships between disasters and development. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2002;17 (2):110–115.Google Scholar
4.Chavez, CW, Binder, B.A hospital as victim and responder: the Sepulveda VA Medical Center and the Northridge earthquake. J Emerg Med. 1996;14 (4):445–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Rubenstein, LV, Yano, EM, Fink, A.Evaluation of the VA's Pilot Program in Institutional Reorganization toward Primary and Ambulatory Care: Part I, Changes in process and outcomes of care. Acad Med. 1996;71 (7):772–783.Google Scholar
6.Rubenstein, LV, Lammers, J, Yano, EM, Tabbarah, M, Robbins, AS.Evaluation of the VA's Pilot Program in Institutional Reorganization Toward Primary and Ambulatory Care: Part II, A study of organizational stresses and dynamics. Acad Med. 1996;71 (7):784–792.Google Scholar
7.Norris, FH, Friedman, MJ, Watson, PJ, Byrne, CM, Diaz, E, Kaniasty, K.60,000 disaster victims speak: Part I. An empirical review of the empirical literature, 1981-2001. Psychiatry. 2002;65 (3):207–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Ware, CD Jr, Sherbourne, JE.The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30 (6):473–483.Google Scholar
9.Rumpf, HJ, Meyer, C, Hapke, U, John, U.Screening for mental health: validity of the MHI-5 using DSM-IV Axis I psychiatric disorders as gold standard. Psychiatry Res. 2001;105 (3):243–253.Google Scholar
10.Cuijpers, P, Smits, N, Donker, T, ten Have, M, de Graaf, R.Screening for mood and anxiety disorders with the five-item, the three-item, and the two-item Mental Health Inventory. Psychiatry Res. 2009;168 (3):250–255.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Berwick, DM, Murphy, JM, Goldman, PA, Ware, AJ Jr, Barsky, JE, Weinstein, MC.Performance of a five-item mental health screening test. Med Care. 1991;29 (2):169–176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Jette, AM, Davies, AR, Cleary, PD.The Functional Status Questionnaire: reliability and validity when used in primary care. J Gen Intern Med. 1986;1 (3):143–149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Yarnold, PR, Bryant, FB, Repasy, AB, Martin, GJ.The factor structure and cross-sectional distributional properties of the Beth Israel/UCLA Functional Status Questionnaire. J Behav Med. 1991;14 (2):141–153.Google Scholar
14.Yarnold, PR, Stille, FC, Martin, GJ.Cross-sectional psychometric assessment of the Functional Status Questionnaire: use with geriatric versus nongeriatric ambulatory medical patients. Int J Psychiatry Med. 1995;25 (4):305–317.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Yuan, K-H, Bentler, PM, Kano, Y.On averaging variables in a confirmatory factor analysis model. Behaviormetrika. 1997;24:71–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Bentler, PMEQS 6 Structural Equations Program Manual.Encino, CA: Multivariate Software; 2006.Google Scholar
17.Phifer, JF.Psychological distress and somatic symptoms after natural disaster: differential vulnerability among older adults. Psychol Aging. 1990;5 (3):412–420.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Ginexi, EM, Weihs, K, Simmens, SJ, Hoyt, DR.Natural disaster and depression: a prospective investigation of reactions to the 1993 midwest floods. Am J Community Psychol. 2000;28 (4):495–518.Google Scholar
19.Knight, BG, Gatz, M, Heller, K, Bengtson, VL.Age and emotional response to the Northridge earthquake: a longitudinal analysis. Psychol Aging. 2000;15 (4):627–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Ullman, J, Newcomb, MI felt the earth move: a prospective study of the 1994 Northridge earthquake.In: Cohen P, Slomkowski C, Robins L, eds. Historical and Geographical Influences on Psychopathology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence J. Erlbaum; 1999:217-246.Google Scholar
21.Siegel, J, Shoaf, K, Borque, L.The C-Mississippi Scale for PTSD in post-earthquake communities. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters. 2000;18:339–346.Google Scholar
22.Asarnow, J, Glynn, S, Pynoos, RS.When the earth stops shaking: earthquake sequelae among children diagnosed for pre-earthquake psychopathology. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1999;38 (8):1016–1023.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23. McMillen, JC, North, CS, Smith, EM.What parts of PTSD are normal: intrusion, avoidance, or arousal? Data from the Northridge, California, earthquake. J Trauma Stress. 2000;13 (1):57–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24.Wilson, NJ, Kizer, KW.The VA health care system: an unrecognized national safety net. Health Aff (Millwood). 1997;16 (4):200–204.Google Scholar
25.Norris, FHRange, magnitude, and duration of the effects of disasters on mental health: review update 2005. http://www.katasztrofa.hu/documents/Research_Education_Disaster_Mental_Health.pdf. Published 2005. Accessed May 28, 2011.Google Scholar
26.Yano, EM, Simon, BF, Lanto, AB, Rubenstein, LV.The evolution of changes in primary care delivery underlying the Veterans Health Administration's quality transformation. Am J Public Health. 2007;97 (12):2151–2159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27.MacCallum, RC, Wegener, DT, Uchino, BN, Fabrigar, LR.The problem of equivalent models in applications of covariance structure analysis. Psychol Bull. 1993;114 (1):185–199.Google Scholar