Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T17:25:20.359Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Foresight of the Consequences of the Hazmat Release From an Oil Refinery on the Surrounding Urban Community Following an Earthquake: A Natech Scenario Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2022

Parvin Shafiei Moghaddam
Affiliation:
Department of Health in Disasters and Emergencies, School of Public Health and Safety, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran Rescue and Relief and Disaster Management Department, Iran Helal Institute of Applied Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran
Katayoun Jahangiri*
Affiliation:
Department of Health in Disasters and Emergencies, School of Public Health and Safety, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Sanaz Sohrabizadeh
Affiliation:
Department of Health in Disasters and Emergencies, School of Public Health and Safety, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran Air Quality and Climate Change Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Nemat Hassani
Affiliation:
Department Civil, Water and Environmental Engineering, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
Mohammad Hoseini Moghaddam
Affiliation:
Department of Prospective Studies, Institute for Social and Cultural Studies (ISCS), Tehran, Iran
Ghazaleh Monazami Tehrani
Affiliation:
Health, Safety and Environment Department, School of Public Health and Safety, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
*
Corresponding author: Katayoun Jahangiri, Email: k.jahangiri@sbmu.ac.ir

Abstract

Objective:

To analyze the consequences of the Natech scenario of H2S toxic gas release from an oil refinery near Tehran and its effects on surrounding residential areas following an earthquake.

Methods:

This research was an applied study. The Natech risk map and the end-point distance of gas release were determined using the Rapid-n software and the Worst-Case Scenario of RMP, respectively.

Results:

Regarding the high seismic vulnerability of the structures affected by the Natech risk, all residents of this area were simultaneously affected by earthquake and the toxic gas inhalation. In comparison to earthquake, response capacities were poor for Natech events, due to insufficient resources, limited accessibility, lack of planning, and unsafe evacuation places in exposed regions. Unlike earthquake, few studies have been conducted on Natech risk assessment and related consequences in Iran. Our study not only covered this gap but also revealed some dimensions of consequences of human, structural, and response capacities.

Conclusions:

It is recommended to have plans for implementing short-term such as identifying vulnerable industries and areas, public awareness and long-term such as land use planning measures to reduce Natech risk and resilience improvement.

Type
Original Research
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Showalter, PS, Myers, MF. Natural disasters in the United States as release agents of oil, chemicals, or radiological materials between 1980-1989: analysis and recommendations. JRA. 1994;14(2):169-182. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00042.x Google ScholarPubMed
World Health Organization. Chemical releases caused by natural hazard events and disasters: information for public health authorities. Published August 22, 2018. Accessed February 16, 2022. https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/9789241513395 Google Scholar
Krausmann, E, Cruz, AM. Impact of the 11 March 2011, Great East Japan earthquake and tsunami on the chemical industry. Nat Hazards. 2013;67(2):811-828. doi: 10.1007/s11069-013-0607-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Necci, A, Argenti, F, Landucci, G, Cozzani, V. Accident scenarios triggered by lightning strike on atmospheric storage tanks. JRE Safety S. 2014;127:30-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2014.02.005 Google Scholar
Sengul, H, Santella, N, Steinberg, LJ, Cruz, AM. Analysis of hazardous material releases due to natural hazards in the United States. Disasters. 2012;36(4):723-743. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2012.01272.x CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Santella, N, Steinberg, LJ, Aguirra, GA. Empirical estimation of the conditional probability of Natech events within the United States. JRA. 2011;31(6):951-968. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01561.x Google ScholarPubMed
Krausmann, E, Renni, E, Campedel, M, Cozzani, V. Industrial accidents triggered by earthquakes, floods and lightning: lessons learned from a database analysis. Nat Hazards. 2011;59(1):285-300. doi: 10.1007/s11069-011-9754-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krausmann, E, Cruz, AM, Salzano, E. Natech risk assessment and management: reducing the risk of natural-hazard impact on hazardous installations. Elsevier; 2016.Google Scholar
Necci, A. Cascading events triggering industrial accidents: quantitative assessment of NaTech and domino scenarios. Alma; 2015.Google Scholar
Yu, J, Cruz, AM, Hokugo, A. Households’ risk perception and behavioral responses to Natech accidents. IJDRS. 2017;8(1):1-15. doi: 10.1007/s13753-017-0116-y Google Scholar
Young, S. Natural-technologic events: the frequency and severity of toxic releases during and after natural disasters with emphasis on wind and seismic events. NIST Special Publication SP; 2002:261-266.Google Scholar
Steinberg, LJ, Sengul, H, Cruz, AM. Natech risk and management: an assessment of the state of the art. Nat Hazards. 2008;46(2):143-152. doi: 10.1007/s11069-007-9205-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reitherman, R. Earthquake-caused hazardous materials releases. Hazardous Materials Spills Conference Proceedings; 1982:19-22.Google Scholar
UNISDR. Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015–2030. UNISDR; 2015:14-18.Google Scholar
Steinberg, LJ, Cruz, AM, Vardar-Sukar, F, Ersoz, Y. Hazardous materials releases during the August 17, 1999 earthquake in Turkey. Conference Paper. 2001:1-10. doi: 10.1061/40569(2001)445 Google Scholar
Steinberg, LJ, Cruz, AM. When natural and technological disasters collide: lessons from the Turkey earthquake of August 17. 1999 Nat Hazards Rev. 2004;5(3):121-130. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2004)5:3(121)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Girgin, S. The Natech events during the 17 August 1999 Kocaeli earthquake: aftermath and lessons learned. JNH, Sciences ES. 2011;11(4):1129-1140. doi: 10.5194/nhess-11-1129-2011 Google Scholar
Lindell, MK, Perry, RW. Hazardous materials releases in the Northridge earthquake: implications for seismic risk assessment. JRA. 1997;17(2):147-156.Google Scholar
Krausmann, E, Cruz, AM, Affeltranger, B. The impact of the 12 May 2008 Wenchuan earthquake on industrial facilities. JLPPI. 2010;23(2):242-248. doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2009.10.004 Google Scholar
Jahangiri, K, Eivazi, M-R, Mofazali, AS. The role of foresight in avoiding systematic failure of natural disaster risk management. IJODRR. 2017;21:303-311. do: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.01.008 Google Scholar
Saffari, H, , Pouladvand M. Seismic microzonation of Tehran based on deterministic seismic hazard analysis and seismic indexes around faults. JoSCE Journal of Structural Construction Engineering. 2017;4(3):109-128.Google Scholar
Kamranzad, F, Memarian, H, Zare, M. Earthquake risk assessment for Tehran. Iran IIJoG-I. 2020;9(7):430. doi: 10.3390/ijgi9070430 Google Scholar
Hassani, N. A study of vulnerability, improvement and crisis management of Tehran gas network in case of an earthquake. Report. Published 2020. Accessed 2020. https://tehrangasco.ir.[in Persian]Google Scholar
Berberian, M. Active faulting and tectonics of Iran. JZHKHGE Zagros Hindu Kush Himalaya Geodynamic Evolution. 1981;3:33-69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Association, American Industrial Hygienists. Emergency response planning guidelines (ERPG) and workplace environmental exposure levels (WEEL) handbook. AIHA; Fairfax, VA, 2007.Google Scholar
US EPA. Risk management program guidance for offsite consequence analysis. EPA 550B99009. Published March 2009. Accessed February 16, 2022. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2013-11/documents/oca-chps.pdf Google Scholar
Statistical Center of Iran. National Population and Housing Census; 2016. Accessed January 9, 2022. https://ssis.sci.org.ir Google Scholar
municipality, Tehran. Safe emergency evacuation centers of Tehran Regions, 2021. Accessed January 9, 2022. www.region20.tehran.ir Google Scholar
JICA. The comprehensive master plan study on urban seismic disaster prevention and management for the greater Tehran area in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Japan International Cooperation Agency; 2004.Google Scholar
JICA. The study on seismic microzoning of the Greater Tehran Area in the Islamic Republic of Iran. JPCIR Japan International Cooperation Agency, OYO Cooperation, Japan. 2000:291-390.Google Scholar
Amini Hosseini, K, Hosseini, M, Jafari, MK, , Hosseinioon S. Recognition of vulnerable urban fabrics in earthquake zones: a case study of the Tehran metropolitan area. JSEE. 2009;10(4):175-187. http://www.iiees.ac.ir/jsee Google Scholar
Hajibabaee, M, Amini-Hosseini, K, Ghayamghamian, M. Earthquake risk assessment in urban fabrics based on physical, socioeconomic and response capacity parameters (a case study: Tehran city). JNH. 2014;74(3):2229-2250. doi: 10.1007/s11069-014-1300-7 Google Scholar
Panahi, M, Rezaie, F, Sciences, Meshkani SA. ES. Seismic vulnerability assessment of school buildings in Tehran city based on AHP and GIS. JNH, Sciences ES. 2014;14(4):969-979.Google Scholar
Kheradmand, M, Jahangiri, K, Sohrabizadeh, S, et al. Physical seismic vulnerability assessment of neighborhood emphasizing on critical land uses. IJSI. 2019; doi: 10.1108/IJSI-03-2018-0019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinberg, LJ, Basolo, V, Burby, R, et al. Joint seismic and technological disasters: possible impacts and community preparedness in an urban setting. JNHR. 2004;5(4):159-169. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2004)5:4(159) Google Scholar
Sohrabizadeh, S, Jahangiri, K, Shafiei Moghaddam, P, et al. Earthquake preparedness in higher education structures: a case study of an academic institute in Tehran, Iran. IJDRBE. 2019;10(2/3):175-187. doi: 10.1108/IJDRBE-12-2018-0049 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scawthorn, C, Johnson, GJ. Preliminary report: Kocaeli (Izmit) earthquake of 17 August 1999. ES. 2000;22(7):727-745. doi: 10.1016/s0141-0296(99)00106-6 Google Scholar
Lindell, MK, Perry, RW. Behavioral foundations of community emergency planning. Hemisphere Publishing Corp; 1992.Google Scholar
Yousefian, S, Sohrabizadeh, S, Jahangiri, K. Identifying the components affecting intra-organizational collaboration of health sector in disasters: providing a conceptual framework using a systematic review. IJDRR. 2021:102146. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102146 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindell, MK, Perry, RW. Management. Addressing gaps in environmental emergency planning: hazardous materials releases during earthquakes. JoEPM. 1996;39(4):529-544.Google Scholar
Zanbak, C. Aquifer remediation and chemical recovery following a spill due to an earthquake in Turkey. Methods and Techniques for Cleaning-up Contaminated Sites. Springer; 2008:91-101.Google Scholar
Yu, J, Hokugo, A. Understanding household mobilization time during Natech accident evacuation. JoDR Disaster Research. 2015;10(5):973-980. doi: 10.20965/jdr.2015.p0973 CrossRefGoogle Scholar