Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-568f69f84b-2wqtr Total loading time: 1.105 Render date: 2021-09-21T21:52:54.241Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Implications of Prenatal Exposure to the Spring 2011 Alabama and Missouri Tornadoes on Birth Outcomes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 June 2018

Kenneth E. Christopher*
Affiliation:
School of Health Sciences, Walden University, Minneapolis, MN College of Health and Human Services, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA
Panagiota Kitsantas
Affiliation:
College of Health and Human Services, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA
Kiara K. Spooner
Affiliation:
School of Health Sciences, Walden University, Minneapolis, MN
Joseph F. Robare
Affiliation:
School of Health Sciences, Walden University, Minneapolis, MN College of Health, Environment and Science, Slippery Rock University, Slippery Rock, PA
Dan Hanfling
Affiliation:
Center for Health Security, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD Department of Emergency Medicine, George Washington University, Washington, DC
*Corresponding
Correspondence and reprint requests to Dr Kenneth E. Christopher, Department of Global and Community Health, MS 5B7, College of Health and Human Services, George Mason University, 4400 University Dr, Fairfax, VA 22030 (e-mail: kchristo@gmu.edu).

Abstract

Objective

Despite emerging evidence of the detrimental effects of natural disasters on maternal and child health, little is known about exposure to tornadoes during the prenatal period and its impact on birth outcomes. We examined the relationship between prenatal exposure to the spring 2011 tornado outbreak in Alabama and Joplin (Missouri) and adverse birth outcomes.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective, cross-sectional cohort study using the 2010-2012 linked infant births and deaths data set from the National Center for Health Statistics for tornado-affected counties in Alabama (n=126,453) and Missouri (Joplin, n=6,897). Chi-square and logistic regression analyses were performed to estimate associations between prenatal exposure to tornadoes and birth outcomes.

Results

Prenatal exposure to the tornado incidents did not influence birth weight outcomes. Women exposed to Alabama tornadoes were less likely to have a preterm birth compared to unexposed mothers (OR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.91, 0.96). Preterm births among Joplin-tornado exposed mothers were slightly higher (13%) compared with unexposed mothers (11.2%). Exposed mothers from Joplin were also more likely to have a cesarean section compared to their counterparts (OR: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.02, 1.26).

Conclusions

We found no association between tornado exposure and adverse birth weight and infant mortality rates. Our findings suggest that prenatal exposure can amplify the odds for a cesarean section. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2019;13:279–286)

Type
Original Research
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Antipova, A, Curtis, A. The post-disaster negative health legacy: pregnancy outcomes in Louisiana after Hurricane Andrew. Disasters. 2015;39(4):665-686. doi: 10.1111/disa.12125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Grabich, SC, Robinson, WR, Engel, SM, et al. Hurricane Charley exposure and hazard of preterm delivery, Florida 2004. Matern Child Health J. 2016;20(12):2474-2482. doi: 10.1007/s10995-016-2069-y.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Simeonova, E. Out of sight, out of mind? Natural disasters and pregnancy outcomes in the USA. CESifo Economic Studies. 2011;57(3):403-431. doi: 10.1093/cesifo/ifr005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Boulet, SL, Schieve, LA, Boyle, CA. Birth weight and health and developmental outcomes in US children, 1997-2005. Matern Child Health J. 2011;15(7):836-844. doi: 10.1007/s10995-009-0538-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Kajantie, E, Hovi, P. Is very preterm birth a risk factor for adult cardiometabolic disease? Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014;19(2):112-117. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2013.11.006.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. McCormick, MC, Litt, JS, Smith, VC, Zupancic, JA. Prematurity: an overview and public health implications. Annu Rev Public Health. 2011;32:367-379. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-090810-182459.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Moster, D, Lie, RT, Markestad, T. Long-term medical and social consequences of preterm birth. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(3):262-273. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0706475.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Saigal, S, Doyle, LW. An overview of mortality and sequelae of preterm birth from infancy to adulthood. Lancet. 2008;371(9608):261-269. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60136-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Johnson, TJ, Patel, AL, Jegier, BJ, et al. Cost of morbidities in very low birth weight infants. J Pediatr. 2013;162(2):243-249 e241. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.07.013.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Owen, CM, Goldstein, EH, Clayton, JA, Segars, JH. Racial and ethnic health disparities in reproductive medicine: an evidence-based overview. Semin Reprod Med. 2013;31(5):317-324. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1348889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Russell, RB, Green, NS, Steiner, CA, et al. Cost of hospitalization for preterm and low birth weight infants in the United States. Pediatrics. 2007;120(1):e1-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-2386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Soilly, AL, Lejeune, C, Quantin, C, et al. Economic analysis of the costs associated with prematurity from a literature review. Public Health. 2014;128(1):43-62. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2013.09.014.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Zhang, S, Cardarelli, K, Shim, R, et al. Racial disparities in economic and clinical outcomes of pregnancy among Medicaid recipients. Matern Child Health J. 2013;17(8):1518-1525. doi: 10.1007/s10995-012-1162-0.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Dunkel Schetter, C, Glynn, L. Stress in pregnancy: empirical evidence and theoretical issues to guide interdisciplinary researchers. In: Contrada R, Baum A, eds. The handbook of stress science: biology, psychology, and health. New York: Springer Publishing; 2011:321-343.Google Scholar
15. Dunkel Schetter, C, Tanner, L. Anxiety, depression and stress in pregnancy: implications for mothers, children, research, and practice. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2012;25(2):141-148. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0b013e3283503680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. King, S, Laplante, D. Using natural disasters to study prenatal maternal stress in humans. In: Antonelli MC, ed. Perinatal programming of neurodevelopment. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer Publishing; 2015:285-313.Google Scholar
17. National Centers for Environmental Information. State of the climate: tornadoes page. Tornadoes- Annual 2011. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/national/201113. Accessed March 1, 2017.Google Scholar
18. National Weather Service. Service assessment: the historic tornadoes of April 2011. Silver Spring, MD: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Weather Service US Dept of Commerce; 2011.Google Scholar
19. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. NCHS Instruction Manual, Part 8, Vital Records. Geographic Classification, 2014. Hyattsville, MD: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics US Dept of Health and Human Services; 2013.Google Scholar
20. Tornado Recovery Action Council of Alabama. Cultivating a state of readiness: our response to April 27, 2011; 2012.Google Scholar
21. Knupp, KR, Murphy, TA, Coleman, TA, et al. Meteorological overview of the devastating 27 April 2011 tornado outbreak. Bull Am Meteorolog Soc. 2014;95(7):1041-1062. doi: 10.1175/bams-d-11-00229.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. National Weather Service Central Region. NWS central region service assessment: Joplin, Missouri, tornado – May 22, 2011. Kansas City, MO: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Weather Service, Central Region Headquarters US Dept of Commerce; 2011.Google Scholar
23. Joplin, Missouri. Joplin general demographics and tornado facts page. City of Joplin, Missouri. http://www.joplinmo.org/253/fact-sheet-for-city. Accessed March 8, 2017.Google Scholar
24. SHELDUS [database online]. Version 15.2. Columbia, South Carolina: Hazards and Vulnerability Research Institute, University of South Carolina; 2014. http://hvri.geog.sc.edu/SHELDUS/. Accessed March 1, 2017.Google Scholar
25. Zahran, S, Breunig, IM, Link, BG, et al. Maternal exposure to hurricane destruction and fetal mortality. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2014;68(8):760-766. doi: 10.1136/jech-2014-203807.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26. Bluestein, H. Severe convective storms and tornadoes: observations and dynamics. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2013:307-416.Google Scholar
27. Wallace, A. Tornadoes. In: Koenig K, Schultz C, eds. Disaster medicine: comprehensive principles and practices, 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2016:635-641.Google Scholar
28. Harville, EW, Xiong, X, Pridjian, G, et al. Postpartum mental health after Hurricane Katrina: a cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009;9:21. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-9-21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29. Xiong, X, Harville, EW, Mattison, DR, et al. Exposure to Hurricane Katrina, post-traumatic stress disorder and birth outcomes. Am J Med Sci. 2008;336(2):111-115. doi: 10.1097/MAJ.0b013e318180f21c.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30. Grabich, SC, Robinson, WR, Konrad, CE, Horney, JA. Impact of hurricane exposure on reproductive health outcomes, Florida, 2004. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2017;11(4):407-411. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2016.158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31. Grabich, SC, Robinson, WR, Engel, SM, et al. County-level hurricane exposure and birth rates: application of difference-in-differences analysis for confounding control. Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2015;12:19. doi: 10.1186/s12982-015-0042-7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32. Currie, J, Rossin-Slater, M. Weathering the storm: hurricanes and birth outcomes. J Health Econ. 2013;32(3):487-503. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2013.01.004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33. Hamilton, BE, Sutton, PD, Mathews, TJ, et al. The effect of Hurricane Katrina: births in the U.S. Gulf Coast region, before and after the storm. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2009;58(2):1-28, 32.Google ScholarPubMed
34. Harville, EW, Tran, T, Xiong, X, Buekens, P. Population changes, racial/ethnic disparities, and birth outcomes in Louisiana after Hurricane Katrina. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2010;4(Suppl 1):S39-S45. doi: 10.1001/dmp.2010.15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35. Callaghan, WM, Rasmussen, SA, Jamieson, DJ, et al. Health concerns of women and infants in times of natural disasters: lessons learned from Hurricane Katrina. Matern Child Health J. 2007;11(4):307-311. doi: 10.1007/s10995-007-0177-4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
36. Zotti, ME, Williams, AM, Robertson, M, et al. Post-disaster reproductive health outcomes. Matern Child Health J. 2013;17(5):783-796. doi: 10.1007/s10995-012-1068-x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
37. Zahran, S, Peek, L, Snodgrass, JG, et al. Abnormal labor outcomes as a function of maternal exposure to a catastrophic hurricane event during pregnancy. Natural Hazards. 2012;66(1):61-76. doi: 10.1007/s11069-011-0065-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38. Ko, YL, Lin, PC, Chen, SC. Stress, sleep quality and unplanned Caesarean section in pregnant women. Int J Nurs Pract. 2015;21(5):454-461. doi: 10.1111/ijn.12267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
39. Lowe, NK. A review of factors associated with dystocia and cesarean section in nulliparous women. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2007;52(3):216-228. doi: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2007.03.003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
40. Saunders, TA, Lobel, M, Veloso, C, Meyer, BA. Prenatal maternal stress is associated with delivery analgesia and unplanned cesareans. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;27(3):141-146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
41. Zahran, S, Snodgrass, JG, Peek, L, Weiler, S. Maternal hurricane exposure and fetal distress risk. Risk Anal. 2010;30(10):1590-1601. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01453.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
42. Andrade, SE, Scott, PE, Davis, RL, et al. Validity of health plan and birth certificate data for pregnancy research. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013;22(1):7-15. doi: 10.1002/pds.3319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
43. Martin, JA, Wilson, EC, Osterman, MJ, et al. Assessing the quality of medical and health data from the 2003 birth certificate revision: results from two states. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2013;62(2):1-19.Google ScholarPubMed
44. Vinikoor, LC, Messer, LC, Laraia, BA, Kaufman, JS. Reliability of variables on the North Carolina birth certificate: a comparison with directly queried values from a cohort study. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2010;24(1):102-112. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2009.01087.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
45. Mathews, TJ, MacDorman, MF. Infant mortality statistics from the 2010 period linked birth/infant death data set. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2013;62(8):1-26.Google Scholar
46. Schoendorf, KC, Branum, AM. The use of United States vital statistics in perinatal and obstetric research. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194(4):911-915. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.11.020.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
47. Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response (ASPR). 2017 – 2022 Health care preparedness and response capabilities. Washington, DC: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response (ASPR), Office of Emergency Management, Division of National Healthcare Preparedness Programs US Dept of Health and Human Services; 2016.Google Scholar

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Implications of Prenatal Exposure to the Spring 2011 Alabama and Missouri Tornadoes on Birth Outcomes
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Implications of Prenatal Exposure to the Spring 2011 Alabama and Missouri Tornadoes on Birth Outcomes
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Implications of Prenatal Exposure to the Spring 2011 Alabama and Missouri Tornadoes on Birth Outcomes
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *