Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T12:51:29.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ways of Looking at Prehistoric Rock Art

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2024

Paul G. Bahn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Rock art - paintings, and pecked or engraved images on rocks, whether in caves, shelters, or in the open-air - exists in all but a couple of countries of the world [Bahn, 1998], It spans a period from at least 35,000 years ago to historic times, comprises many millions of images from hundreds of thousands of sites, and thus constitutes the vast majority of the world's art, and art history. It is a phenomenon that has seen a huge upsurge of interest in the last few decades, with not only numerous publications and conferences, but also a proliferation of calendars, T-shirts, mugs, jewellery, and garments bearing rock art images. Many people who are famous for other things have worked on or published rock art - for example, scholars such as Mary Leakey or authors like Joy Adamson or Erle Stanley Gardner. Rock art studies have always been the domain of the “amateur” as well as the “professional”, and amateurs remain of huge importance in this field. Indeed, most of the principal rock art organisations, along with their journals, were created by, are run by, and consist largely of amateur enthusiasts who include some of the world's foremost specialists. The growing popularity of the art brings an ever-increasing risk of pollution, damage, and vandalism, as well as outright thefts of wall or cave images. The rock art associations are dedicated to the discovery, recording, and conservation of rock art, and play a major role in striving to teach schoolchildren and adults alike about the incalculable importance of this irreplaceable, universal heritage and about the need to respect and protect it.

Type
Comment
Information
Diogenes , Volume 49 , Issue 193 , March 2002 , pp. 88 - 93
Copyright
Copyright © ICPHS 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bahn, P.G. (1991). “Where's the beef? The myth of hunting magic in palaeolithic art”, in Rock Art and Prehistory, ed. Bahn, P.G. and Rosenfeld, A., pp. 1–13. Oxbow Monograph 10: Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
Bahn, P.G. (1997). “Membrane and numb brain: a close look at a recent claim for shamanism in palaeolithic art.” Rock Art Research 14 (1): 62–8.Google Scholar
Bahn, P.G. (1998). The Cambridge Illustrated History of Prehistoric Art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bahn, P.G. and Vertut, J. (1997). Journey Through the Ice Age. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, and Berkeley: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Bégouën, H. (1929). “The magic origin of prehistoric art.” Antiquity 3: 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besse, F. (1999). “Portrait d'archéologue. Michel Lorblanchet. Remonter jusqu'à la naissance de l'art.” L'Archéologue 42, juin-juillet, 58–61.Google Scholar
Bradley, R. (1997). Rock Art and the Prehistory of Atlantic Europe: Signing the Land. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Breuil, H. (1952). Four Hundred Centuries of Cave Art. Montignac: Centre d'Etudes et de Documentation Préhistoriques.Google Scholar
Clottes, J. & Lewis-Williams, D. (1996). Les Chamanes de la Préhistoire. Transe et Magie dans les Grottes Ornées Paris: Le Seuil.Google Scholar
Collot, F. et al. (1982). “La théorie de l'information en Préhistoire.” Bio-Mathématique 77, 32pp.Google Scholar
Dauvois, M. (1994). “Les témoins sonores paléolithiques extérieur et souterrain”, in “Sons Originels”, Préhistoire de la Musique, ed. Otte, M., Actes du Colloque de Musicologie, Déc. 1992, pp. 11–31. Liège: ERAUL 61.Google Scholar
Glory, A. (1968). “L'énigme de l'art quaternaire peut-elle être résolue par la théorie du culte des ongones?” in “Simposio de Arte Rupestre”, Barcelona 1966, pp. 25–60.Google Scholar
Krupp, E.C. (1982). Echoes of the Ancient Skies. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Leroi-Gourhan, A. (1965). Préhistoire de l'Art Occidental. Paris: Mazenod.Google Scholar
Lewis-Williams, J.D. and Dowson, T.A. (1989). Images of Power: Understanding Bushman Rock Art. Johannesburg: Southern Book Publishers.Google Scholar
Lommel, A. (1967). The World of the Early Hunters: Medicine-Men, Shamans and Artists London: Evelyn, Adams and Mackay.Google Scholar
Meighan, C.W. (1982). “Rock art and archaeology”. American Indian Rock Art, ed. Bock, F.G., 225–9. El Toro: California.Google Scholar
Prins, F. (2000). “Forgotten Heirs: The Archaeological Colonialisation of the Southern San”, pp. 138–52, in Native Title and the Transformation of Archaeology in the Postcolonial World ed. Lilley, I., Oceania Monograph 50, Sydney: University of Sydney.Google Scholar
Sognnes, K. (1994). “Ritual landscapes: Toward a reinterpretation of Stone Age rock art in Trøndelag, Norway.” Norwegian Archaeological Review 27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solomon, A. (1997). “The myth of ritual origins? Ethnography, mythology and interpretation of San rock art.” South African Archaeological Bulletin 52: 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vinnicombe, P. (1976). People of the Eland. Pietermaritzburg: Natal University Press.Google Scholar
Waller, S. (1993). “Sound reflection as an explanation for the content and context of rock art.” Rock Art Research 10: 91–101.Google Scholar