Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-06T06:27:30.198Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Postmodern Liberalism as a New Humanism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2024

Andrzej Szahaj*
Affiliation:
Nicolaus Copernicus University, Torun

Abstract

John Gray argues that the modern conception of man is common for all variants of the liberal tradition. The version of liberalism which is defended in this paper cannot be called ‘classical’ because it refuses the conception in question (it refuses such elements of it as, for example, claims of universality, idea of neutral Reason, idea of human nature). That is why the best label which can be given to it is ‘postmodern’ or ‘communitarian’ liberalism. Moreover, postmodern liberalism does not express any reluctance toward community as such. It only requires a community which respects the rights of individuals to autonomous, moral and comprehensive choices. In this sense one can say that postmodern liberalism renounces anti-social biases while remaining faithful to individualism, which - starting with the social and the common - arrives at the truly individual. In this way it can revitalize the sense and meaning of humanism understood as the idea of life of human beings who can create their own lives independently and freely in the political and social milieu, promoting justice and solidarity.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © ICPHS 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beiner, R. (1992) What’s the Matter with Liberalism? Berkeley: SAGE Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, R. (1978) Liberalism, in Hamsphire, S. (ed.) Public and Private Morality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Galston, W. (1989), ‘Pluralism and Social Unity’, Ethics 99: 711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, J. (1986) Liberalism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Kelly, M. (1991) ‘MacIntyre, Habermas, Ethics’, in Kelly, M. (ed.) Hermeneutics and Critical Theory in Ethics and Politics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kowalczyk, S. (1995) Liberalizm i jego filozofia. Katowice.Google Scholar
Larmore, C. (1990) ‘Political Liberalism’, Political Theory 18(3): 340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, R. (1997) ‘Sprawiedliwosc jako poszerzona lojalnosc’, Transit, no.3.Google Scholar