Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-xq9c7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-16T14:15:59.664Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Myth and Science around Gender and Sexuality: Eros and the Three Sexes in Plato's Symposium

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2024

Michael Groneberg
Michael Groneberg*
Affiliation:
Fribourg University, Switzerland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Plato's Symposium contains various myths dealing with gender and the erotic, among them Aristophanes’ account of the three original sexes, which are here treated from the standpoint of modern science. In particular we see how, since the 19th century, sexology and psychoanalysis have updated concepts of a third sex and androgyny. Similarities with positions in antiquity demonstrate the relevance and force of the general propositions of myths. Differences appear to imply the effective presence of other myths of Judeo-Christian origin. All things considered, the ancient tensions between Aristophanes’ and Socrates’ attitude are still at work. It is from that viewpoint that the conceptual relationships between androgyny and the third sex are examined.

Type
Research Article
Information
Diogenes , Volume 52 , Issue 4 , November 2005 , pp. 39 - 49
Copyright
Copyright © ICPHS 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bem, Daryl J. (1996) ‘Exotic Becomes Erotic: A Developmental Theory of Sexual Orientation’, Psychological Review 103(2): 320–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brisson, Luc (1973) ‘Bisexualité et médiation en Grèce ancienne’, in Pontalis, J.-B. (ed.) Bisexualité et différence de sexes, pp. 33–64. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Connell, Robert (2005) Masculinities. Berkeley: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Dover, K. J., ed. (1980) Plato. Symposium. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fédida, P. (1973) ‘D'une essentielle dissymétrie dans la psychanalyse’, in Pontalis, J.-B. (ed.) Bisexualité et différence de sexes, pp. 236–49. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel (1984) Histoire de la Sexualité II. L'usage des plaisirs. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Groneberg, Michael (2003) ‘À propos du sexe de l'âme’, Studia Philosophica 62: Le corps dans la philosophie – Der Körper in der Philosophie, pp. 197–209. Bern/Stuttgart/Wien: Haupt Verlag.Google Scholar
Halperin, David (1990) ‘Why is Diotima a Woman?’, in D. Halperin, One Hundred Years of Homosexuality, pp. 113–152. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hamer, D. and Copeland, P. (1994) The Science of Desire: The Search for the 'Gay Gene' and the Biology of Behaviour. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Hirschfeld, Magnus (1991) Berlins drittes Geschlecht. Berlin: Rosa Winkel Verlag.Google Scholar
Hirschfeld, Magnus (2001) Zur Homosexualität des Mannes und des Weibes. Berlin (orig. 1904).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotula, Dean, ed. (2002) The Phallus Palace: Female to Male Transsexuals. Los Angeles, CA: Alyson.Google Scholar
Pontalis, J.-B., ed. (1973) Bisexualité et différence de sexes. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Rowe, C. J. (1998) Plato. Symposium. Warminster: Aris & Philips.Google Scholar
Schmidt-Berger, Ute (1985) Platon. Das Trinkgelage. Franfurt/Main: Insel.Google Scholar
Ulrichs, K. H. (1994) Forschungen über das Rätsel der mannmännlichen Liebe, ed. Kennedy, H.. Berlin: Rosa Winkel (New York: Arno Press, 1975).Google Scholar