Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T23:25:33.292Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mysticism and Society

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2024

Extract

If we wish to discuss mysticism and society in their mutual relationship there is one astonishing fact which should be pointed out from the outset. In the infinite welter of literature on mysticism which, especially during the last two generations, has taken on quite extraordinary proportions, the problem of mysticism and society has received but scanty attention. The way of the mystic in trying to attain his goal of union or communion with God or however we may define his goal, the peculiar spiritual universe in which he lives, the intricacies of mystical theology, which has the formulation of mystical experience in a conceptural framework and the establishment of an acceptable connection between these experiences and traditional forms of theology—all these have been discussed in full detail. Even the history of such developments in different systems and religions has always aroused the interest of the historian. The social context of mysticism and its implications, however, have, as far as I am aware, only a marginal place in these discussions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1967 Fédération Internationale des Sociétés de Philosophie / International Federation of Philosophical Societies (FISP)

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The paper, on which the present essay is based, was given at a symposium on Mysticism and Society arranged by the Frank Weil Institute at the Hebrew Union College, Cincinnati, Ohio, in April 1966.

References

1 In Diogenes, No. 15, and in my book, On the Kabbalah and its Symbolism, New York, 1965, pp. 32-86.

2 For a more detailed discussion of these points, see my article on Devequth in the Journal of Religion, New York, 1950, pp. 115-139.