Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-14T19:20:36.705Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Conceptualizing Contextual Emotion The Grounds for “Supra-Rationality”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

Barbara Gail Hanson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

[Anne:] “I can't, I'm in the depths of despair. Can you eat when you are in the depths of despair?”

“I've never been in the depths of despair, so I can't say,” said Marilla.

“Weren't you? Well did you ever try to imagine you were in the depths of despair?”

” No, I didn't.”

“Then I don't think you can understand what it's like. It's a very uncomfortable feeling indeed. When you try to eat a lump comes right up in your throat and you can't swallow anything, not even if it was a chocolate caramel.”

—L.M. Montgomery, Anne of Green Gables.

Emotion, as a “suprarational” property, transcends rationality in that it can be thought of as a group, contextual rather than as a solely individual trait, and thus is a higher order property, as the above quote suggests. This proposal arises from a metatheoretical analysis of models available to broach questions of emotion. I use metatheoretical in the sense of both the context of theory production and the theory of theory. From the first arose the idea that emotion, through the use of irrationality, has surfaced as a working equivalent to inexplicability or rational relativity, and can be modelled more adequately as suprarational, with a unique nature in its own right. The latter led me to propose that the concept of emotion as contextual, a higher order group level property, is possible and tentatively profitable.

Type
Research Article
Information
Diogenes , Volume 39 , Issue 156 , December 1991 , pp. 33 - 46
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 Fédération Internationale des Sociétés de Philosophie / International Federation of Philosophical Societies (FISP)

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Asch, S.E. 1981. “The individual and the group.” In Emery, F., ed., Systems Thinking: 2,138–156, Markham: Penguin Books, Canada.Google Scholar
Bateson, G. 1956. “Towards a Theory of Schizophrenia.” Behavioral Science 1:251–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Beauvoir, S. 1974. The Second Sex. New York: Vintage Books. von Bertalanffy, L. 1968. General System Theory. New York: George Braziller.Google Scholar
Checkland, P.B. 1983. “Science and the systems movement.” In Group, Open Systems, ed., Systems Behavior, 26–43. New York: Harper and Row Publishers, 3d edition.Google Scholar
Coulter, J. 1986. “Affect and social context: Emotion definition as a social task.” In Harre, R., ed., The Social Construction of Emotions, 120–13. New York: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Doane, J.A., Falloon, I.R.H., Goldstein, M.J., and Mintz, J.. 1985. “Parental affective style and the treatment of schizophrenia.” Archives of General Psychiatry 42:34–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Erickson, K.V. 1974. Aristotle: The Classical Heritage of Rhetoric. Metuchen, New Jersey: Scarecrow Press.Google Scholar
Freud, S. 1965 (1933). New Introductory Lectures on Psycho-Analysis. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Hanson, B.G. 1989. “Definitional Deficit: A Model of Senile Dementia in Context.” Family Process 28(3): 281–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harre, R. 1986. “An Outline of the social constructionist viewpoint.” In Harre, R., ed., The Social Construction of Emotions, 2–14. New York: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kast, F.E., Rosenzweig, J.E., and Checkland, P.B.. 1983. “The modern view: A systems approach.” In Open Systems Group, ed., 3d ed., Systems Behavior, 44–58. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Katsumata, S., ed. 1954. Kenkyusha's New Japanese-English Dictionary. Tokyo: Kenkyusha.Google Scholar
Kemper, T.D. 1978. “Toward a Sociology of Emotions: Some Problems and Some Solutions” The American Sociologist 13:30–41.Google Scholar
Laing, R.D. 1969. The Politics of the Family. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Lewin, K. 1951. Field Theology in Social Science. New York: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar
Montgomery, L.M. 1908. Anne of Green Gables. Toronto: McClelland-Bantam.Google Scholar
Radley, A. 1988. “The Social Form of Feeling.” British Journal of Social Psychology 27:5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rapoport, A. 1989. “The Redemption of Science.” Journal of Business Ethics 8:157–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rapoport, A. 1968. “Foreword.” In Buckley, W. ed, Modern Systems Research for the Behavioral Scientist. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
Reiss, D. 1981. The Family's Construction of Reality. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rule, J.B. 1989. Rationality and Non-Rationality in Militant Collective Action.” Sociological Theory 7(2):145–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheff, T. 1990. Microsociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Sutherland, J.W. 1973. A General Systems Philosophy for the Social and Behavioral Sciences. New York: George Braziller.Google Scholar
Tomkins, S.S. 1970. “Affects as the Primary Motivational Systems.” In Arnold, M. B., ed., Feelings and Emotions. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Tomkins, S.S. 1965. “The biopsychosociality of the family.” In Coale, A. J., Fallers, L. A., Levy, M. J. Jr., Schneider, D. M., and Tomkins, S. S., eds., Aspects of the Analysis of Family Structure, 102–248. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tomkins, S. S.. 1962. Affect, Imagery, Consciousness, Vol. 1, New York: Springer. Watzlawick, P., Beavin, J.H., and Jackson, D.D.. 1967. Pragmatics of Human Communication. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Weiner, N. 1948. Cybernetics New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Zajonc, R.B. 1968. “Cognitive theories in social psychology.” In Lindzey, G. and Aronson, E., eds., The Handbook of Social Psychology. Vol. 1. Don Mills: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar