Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T00:02:05.488Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Philosophy and Art: Changing Landscapes for Aesthetics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Curtis L. Carter
Curtis L. Carter*
Affiliation:
Marquette University, USA
*
Curtis L. Carter, Marquette University, PO Box 1881, Milwaukee, WI 53201-1881, USA. Email: curtislcarter@sbcglobal.net
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Part I of this essay will examine how the interplay between philosophy and art over the past century is reflected in the aesthetic theories of four leading Twentieth century aestheticians: Walter Benjamin, Merleau-Ponty, Gilles Deleuze, Arthur Danto. The philosophers’ theories are linked to the developments in art most directly related to their respective approaches to problems in aesthetics. Part II will explore selected non-philosophical social and technological developments that are in the process of altering the course of contemporary art today. Among these are globalization, the art market, social/political issues, popular culture, virtual reality, and new manifestations of the avant-garde. Key factors that warrant consideration for future developments in aesthetics are identified in the hope that today’s and future aestheticians will begin to consider what changes are required in aesthetics to address these new developments in art.

Type
Articles
Information
Diogenes , Volume 59 , Issue 1-2: Why New Aesthetics? , May 2012 , pp. 84 - 100
Copyright
Copyright © ICPHS 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barbaras, R (2001) ‘Merleau-Ponty and Nature,’ Research in Phenomenology 31(1): 22–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Daniel (1962) The End of Ideology. New York: Collier Books.Google Scholar
Belting, H (2007) ‘Preface to Conference Program,’ The Interplay of Art and Globalization: Consequences for Museums, Vienna, January 25–27. Vienna: Research Center for Cultural Studies.Google Scholar
Benjamin, W S B (1996) ‘The Theory of Criticism,’ in Bullcok, M, Jennings, M (eds) Walter Benjamin: Selected Writings, i, 1913–1926: 217–219. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP.Google Scholar
Benjamin, W S B (2003) ‘The Work of Art in the Age of Reproducibility,’ in Bullcok, M, Jennings, M (eds) Walter Benjamin: Selected Writings, iv, 1938–1940, pp. 251–284. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP.Google Scholar
Bishop, C, ed. (2006) Participation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bonsdorf, Clemens (2010) ‘Dots Joined,’ The Art Newspaper, 217, October: 60.Google Scholar
Bourriaud, N (2002) Relational Aesthetics, trans. by Pleasance, S, Woods, F, with the participation of M Copeland. Dijon: Les Presses du réel.Google Scholar
Carroll, N (1998) A Philosophy of Mass Art. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Carter, C L (1992–1993) ‘Beyond Performance: Re Jan Fabre,’ in Jan Fabre: Texts on His Theater-Work, pp. 13–26. Brussels: Theater Am Turm.Google Scholar
Carter, C L (2011) ‘The Avant-Garde in Twentieth Century Chinese Art,’ in Wiseman, M, Liu, Y (eds) Subversive Strategies in Chinese Contemporary Art: Western Criticism and Chinese Aesthetics Art, pp. 295–321. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crow, Kelly (2006) ‘The (23-Year-) Old Masters,’ The Wall Street Journal, April 14: W1.Google Scholar
Danto, A C (1994a) ‘Introduction: Philosophy and the Criticism of Art,’ in Embodied Meanings: Critical Essays and Aesthetic Meditations, pp. 3–14. New York: Farrar Straus Giroux.Google Scholar
Danto, A C (1994b) ‘Art after the End of Art,’ in Embodied Meanings: Critical Essays and Aesthetic Meditations, pp. 321–333. New York: Farrar Straus Giroux.Google Scholar
Danto, A C (2001) ‘The Work of Art and the Historical Future,’ in The Madonna of the Future: Essays in a Pluralistic Art World, pp. 416–443. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Danto, A C (2007) ‘Embodied Meanings, Isotypes and Aesthetical Ideas,’ in Feagin, S (ed.) Global Theories of the Arts and Aesthetics, pp. 121–129. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G (1994) Francis Bacon: logique de la sensation. Paris: Éd. de la Différence.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G (1995) Negotiations: 1972–1990, trans. Joughin, M. New York: Columbia UP.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G (2003) The Logic of Sensation, trans. Smith, D W. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G, Guattari, F (1994) What is Philosophy?, trans. Tomlinson, H, Burchell, G. New York: Columbia UP.Google Scholar
De Mul, J (2010) Cyberspace Odyssey: Towards a Virtual Ontology and Anthropology. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Elkins, J, ed. (2007) Is Art History Global? London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Erjavec, A, ed. (2003) Postmodernism and the Postsocialist Condition: Politicized Art Under Late Socialism. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erjavec, A (2004) ‘Aesthetics and Globalization: An Introduction,’ International Yearbook of Aesthetics, 8: 3–14.Google Scholar
Goldberg, R, ed. (2010) Everywhere and All at Once. An Anthology of Writings on Performa 07. Zürich: JPR Ringler.Google Scholar
Greenberg, C (1960) ‘Modernist Painting,’ in Kostelanetz, R (ed.) Esthetics Contemporary, pp. 198–206. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Jameson, F (1998) ‘Notes on Globalization as a Philosophical Issue,’ in Jameson, F, Meyoshi, M (eds) The Cultures of Globalization, pp. 54–78. Durham: Duke UP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaprow, A (1993) Essays on the Blurring of Art and Life, ed. Kelley, J. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M (1993a) ‘Eye and Mind,’ in Johnson, G A (ed.) The Merleau-Ponty Aesthetics Reader: Philosophy and Painting, pp. 121–149. Evanston, IL: Northwestern UP.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M (1993b) ‘Cezanne's Doubt,’ in Johnson, G A (ed.) The Merleau-Ponty Aesthetics Reader: Philosophy and Painting, pp. 59–75. Evanston, IL: Northwestern UP.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M (1993c) ‘Indirect Language and the Voices of Silence,’ in Johnson, G A (ed.) The Merleau-Ponty Aesthetics Reader: Philosophy and Painting, pp. 76–120. Evanston, IL: Northwestern UP.Google Scholar
Perez-Vega, I (2009) ‘Willie Bester: An Artist Resisting the Injustice in Post-Apartheid South Africa,’ paper presented at the workshop ‘Law and Society in the 21st Century.’ Berlin: Vereinigung für Recht und Gesellschaft, www.rechtssoziologie.info/berlin2007/.Google Scholar
Pollack, B (2011) ‘You’re Engaged,’ Art News, January: 85–87.Google Scholar
Rush, M (2006) ‘Virtual Reality Beyond Technology,’ New York Times, January 6.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, A M (1991) Reflections on a Multicultural Society. Washington, DC: President's Committee on the Arts and Humanities.Google Scholar
Smith, D W. (2003) ‘Deleuze on Bacon: Three Conceptual Trajectories in the Logic of Sensation,’ translator's introduction to Francis Bacon: The Logic of Sensation, pp. vii–xxvii. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Stein, G (1970) Gertrude Stein on Picasso, Burns, E. (ed.). New York: Liveright Publishing Corp.Google Scholar
Vogel, C (2006) ‘Warhols of Tomorrow are Dealers’ Quarry Today,’ New York Times, April 15.Google Scholar