Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-24T00:38:30.598Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Morals and Marx

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2010

Jan Narveson
Affiliation:
University of Waterloo

Extract

There are fourteen original papers (plus Kai Nielsen's introduction) in this substantial volume devoted to the general problem of the relation of Marxism, or at least Marxism as found in the works of Marx, and moral theory. The questions are, in Nielsen's words, “whether there should be or even could be a Marxist moral theory and if there could be a Marxist moral theory, what sort of a moral theory it should be” (1) (all references in this Critical Notice are to pages in the volume under review). Why does he not include the question what Marx's moral theory is? For a few of these writers do think that Marx had (at least in fragmentary form) some moral views that inform his writing, and attempt to say what they are. But Nielsen is justified in putting the questions they treat of in the way he does, for as is commonly known, Marx had no explicit, worked- out moral theory. So if one wishes to argue that he nevertheless has a morality or part of a morality, one has no alternative to attempting to infer it from what he does say.

Type
Critical Notices/Etudes critiques
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Nielsen, Kai and Patten, Steven C., eds., Marx and Morality, Canadian Journal of Philosophy Supplementary Volume 7 (1981), pp. 352, 27Google Scholar bibliography, price not stated (free with subscription, or write to Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Department of Philosophy, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada T1K 3M4).