Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T08:30:53.088Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Dignity of a Rule: Wittgenstein, Mathematical Norms, and Truth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2010

Michael Hymers
Michael Hymers
Affiliation:
Dalhousie University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Articles
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 42 , Issue 3 , Summer 2003 , pp. 419 - 446
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ayer, A. J. 1946 Language, Truth and Logic. 2nd ed.New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Baker, G. P., and Hacker, P. M. S. 1984 Scepticism, Rules and Language. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Baker, G. P., and Hacker, P. M. S. 1985 Wittgenstein, Rules, Grammar, and Necessity. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Boghossian, Paul 1989 “The Rule–Following Considerations.” Mind, 98: 507–49.Google Scholar
Boghossian, Paul 1990 “The Status of Content.” Philosophical Review, 99, 2: 157–84.Google Scholar
Boghossian, Paul 1994 “Sense, Reference and Rule–Following.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 54, 1: 139–44.Google Scholar
Boghossian, Paul 1996 “Analyticity Reconsidered.”Noûs, 30, 3: 360–91.Google Scholar
Boghossian, Paul 2000 “Knowledge of Logic.” In New Essays on the A Priori. Edited by Boghossian, Paul and Peacocke, Christopher. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 229–54.Google Scholar
Brandom, Robert 1994 Making It Explicit. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Canfield, John V. 1981 Critical Notice of Diamond, Cora, ed., Wittgenstein's Lectures on the Foundations of Mathematics—Cambridge, 1939. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 11, 2: 333–55.Google Scholar
Dillard, Peter S. 1996 “Radical Anti-Deflationism.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 56, 1: 173–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Divers, John, and Miller, Alexander 1995 “Platitudes and Attitudes: A Minimalist Conception of Belief.” Analysis, 55, 1:37–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dummett, Michael 1966 “Wittgenstein's Philosophy of Mathematics.” In Wittgenstein: The Philosophical Investigations. Edited by Pitcher, George. London: Macmillan, pp. 420–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dummett, Michael 1991 The Logical Basis of Metaphysics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ebbs, Gary 1997 Rule–Following and Realism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glock, Hans-Johann 1996 “Necessity and Normativity.” In The Cambridge Companion to Wittgenstein. Edited by Sluga, Hans and Stern, David G.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 198–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hymers, Michael 1996 “Internal Relations and Analyticity: Wittgenstein and Quine.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 26, 4: 591–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dummett, Michael 2000 Philosophy and Its Epistemic Neuroses. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, Frank, Oppy, Graham, and Smith, Michael 1994 “Minimalism and Truth Aptness.” Mind, 103, 411:287–302.Google Scholar
Jacobsen, Rockney 1997 “Semantic Character and Expressive Content.” Philosophical Papers, 26, 2: 129–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobsen, Rockney 1999 “Moral Realism for Irrealists.” Western Canadian Philosophical Association Meeting, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Oct. 16.Google Scholar
Kripke, Saul 1980 Naming and Necessity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kripke, Saul 1982 Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, David 1969 Convention: A Philosophical Study. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
McDowell, John 1998 Mind, Value, and Reality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. 1964 “Truth by Convention.” In Philosophy of Mathematics: Selected Readings. Edited by Benacerraf, Paul and Putnam, Hilary. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice–Hall, pp. 322–45.Google Scholar
Shanker, Stuart G. 1987 Wittgenstein and the Turning–Point in the Philosophy of Mathematics. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Tennebaum, Sergio 1996 “Realists without a Cause: Deflationary Theories of Truth and Ethical Realism.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 26, 4: 561–90.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig 1922 Tractatus Logico–Philosophicus. Translated by Ogden, C. K.. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig 1968 Philosophical Investigations. 3rd ed. Edited by Anscombe, G. E. M. and Rhees, R.. Translated by G. E. M. Anscombe. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig 1972 On Certainty. Edited by Anscombe, G. E. M. and von Wright, G. H.. Translated by D. Paul and G. E. M. Anscombe. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig 1976 Wittgenstein's Lectures on the Foundations of Mathematics—Cambridge, 1939. Edited by Diamond, C.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig 1978 Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics. Rev. ed. Edited by von Wright, G. H., Rhees, R., and Anscombe, G. E. M.. Translated by G. E. M. Anscombe. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig 1979a Notebooks, 1914–1916. 2nd ed. Edited by von Wright, G. H. and Anscombe, G. E. M.. Translated by G. E. M. Anscombe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig 1979b Wittgenstein's Lectures, Cambridge, 1932–35. Edited by Ambrose, Alice. Totowa: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Wright, Crispin 1984 “Kripke's Account of the Argument against Private Language.” Journal of Philosophy, 81, 11: 759–78.Google Scholar