Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-07T08:34:07.942Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Intrathecal baclofen for generalized dystonia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 October 2001

A Leland Albright
Affiliation:
Department of Neurosurgery, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh and the Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Margaret J Barry
Affiliation:
Department of Neurosurgery, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh and the Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
David H Shafron
Affiliation:
Department of Neurosurgery, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh and the Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Susan S Ferson
Affiliation:
Department of Neurosurgery, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh and the Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Get access

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of intrathecal bacolfen (ITB) on patients with severe generalized dystonia. Eighty-six participants ranging in age from 3 to 42 years (median age 13 years) with generalized dystonia refractory to oral medications were offered treatment with ITB. Dystonia was associated with cerebral palsy in 71% of participants. Response to ITB was tested by continuous infusions in 72%, and by bolus injections in 17% of participants who had both dystonia and spasticity. Ninety-one percent of participants responded to the screening infusion and 93% to the bolus injections. Pumps were implanted in 77 participants. Dystonia scores at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months were significantly decreased (p<0.005) compared with baseline scores. Dystonia scores were significantly lower in those with intrathecal catheters positioned at T4, or higher than in those with catheters at T6 or lower (p=0.005). Ninety-two percent of participants implanted with a pump retained their responses to ITB during a median follow-up of 29 months. Patient questionnaires indicated that quality of life and ease of care improved in 86% and speech improved in 33%. Side effects of ITB occurred in 26% of participants. Surgical complications occurred in 38% and included CSF leaks, infections, and catheter problems. ITB is probably the treatment of choice for generalized dystonia if oral medications are ineffective.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
© 2001 Mac Keith Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)