No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Motion/Perception: William Forsythe's Spectatorial Shifts
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 January 2013
Abstract
What do we mean when we talk about perception in/of dance? The movement of viewers of William Forsythe's dance and performance installation works affords perceptual change in multiple senses—sensory, cognitive, philosophical, aesthetic. This paper explores issues of action, perspective, and convention in the performance of dance spectatorship through a consideration of Forsythe's mobilized audiences. Moving within and between diverse disciplines, this paper simultaneously examines disciplinary specificity, variance, and crossover of the term “perception.”
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s) 2007
References
Notes
1. Kisselgoff, Anna, “The Sound and the Flurry of William Forsythe,” York Times, July 19, 1987.Google Scholar
2. Sulcas, Roslyn, “Both a New World and the Old Made Explicit,” in William Forsythe: Improvisation Technologies (Ostfildern: Hatje Cantz, 2000), 29–46.Google Scholar
3. Bains, Alice, review of Royal Ballet of Flanders, Guardian Unlimited, August 21, 2007.Google Scholar
4. Arnheim, Rudolf, Visual Thinking (1969; reprint, Berkeley: University of California Press, 2004).Google Scholar
5. Lehmann, Hans-Thies, “From Logos to Landscape: Text in Contemporary Dramaturgy,” Performance Research 2 no. 1 (1997): 55–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Fischer-Lichte, Erika et al. , eds., “Einleitung,” Wege der Wahrnehmung: Authentizitat, Reflexivitat, und Aufmerksamkeit im Zeitgenossischen Theater, Recherchen 33 (Theater der Zeit, 2006), 6–11.Google Scholar
7. Noè, Alva, Action in Perception (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2004).Google Scholar
8. Jowitt, Deborah, “Monk and King: The Sixties Kids,” in Reinventing Dance in the 1960s: Everything Was Possible, edited by Banes, Sally (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 2003), 113–36.Google Scholar
9. “William Forsythe in the Middle,” interview with Julie Copeland, Radio National, Australian Broadcasting Corporation, December 3, 2001.
10. Anderson, Joseph, The Reality of Illusion: An Ecological Approach to Cognitive Film Theory (Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1996), 15.Google Scholar
11. Lehmann, “From Logos to Landscape,” 55–60.
12. The first two series of Heterotopia performances (Zürich 2006 and Dresden-Hellerau 2007) offered only one gap passage. There have been two passages in subsequent runs.
13. Dana Caspersen, interview by the author, March 2003.