Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T07:44:11.324Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Detection of pegylated epoetin β in horse plasma after intravenous administration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 October 2009

D H Catlin*
Affiliation:
Anti-Doping Research Inc., 3873 Grand View Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA90066, USA
G A Maylin
Affiliation:
Equine Drug Testing and Research Program, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, 925 Warren Drive, Ithaca, NY14850, USA
S Benchaar
Affiliation:
Anti-Doping Research Inc., 3873 Grand View Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA90066, USA
S M Neades
Affiliation:
Anti-Doping Research Inc., 3873 Grand View Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA90066, USA
M S Timmons
Affiliation:
Anti-Doping Research Inc., 3873 Grand View Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA90066, USA
K H McKeever
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Sciences, The Equine Science Center, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 84 Lipman Drive, New Brunswick, NJ08901-8525, USA
*
*Corresponding author: dcatlin@antidopingresearch.org
Get access

Abstract

Methoxy polyethylene glycol–epoetin β (pegylated epoetin β, peg-epoetin β, Mircera®) is an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent that is synthesized by pegylating epoetin β. It is prohibited in racehorses and humans because it enhances their performance. It is detectable in human urine and plasma using the isoelectric focusing–double-blotting (IEF–DB) method that has been widely applied in human doping control laboratories to detect doping with recombinant erythropoietins (EPOs). Fifty micrograms of peg-epoetin β were administered intravenously to a 450 kg female Thoroughbred, and blood was collected for 48 h. The plasma was processed by immunopurification followed by IEF–DB. The analytical procedures required about 2 days. No peg-epoetin β was detected in the baseline plasma collected prior to drug administration. It was readily detected in samples collected at 2, 4, 6, 8, 24 and 48 h. The isoforms showed a characteristic pattern that differed from epoetin β and was unlike any other known erythrocyte-stimulating agent or recombinant EPO. No peg-epoetin β was detected in plasma from five control horses. The plasma samples were also tested by a rapid, automated and chemiluminescent immunometric assay for EPO (Immulite®). The samples collected from the treated horse at 2–48 h contained the equivalent of approximately 200–800 pg ml− 1 of peg-epoetin β. The samples from the ten control horses were negative. These data show that a small dose of peg-epoetin β is detectable for 48 h by two different methods that are based on two different principles (chemiluminescence immunoassay and IEF–DB). The Immulite® assay is suitable as a screen and the IEF–DB assay as a confirmation method. These studies need to be expanded to other horses. The screen and confirmation tests, if applied, will probably eliminate the use of peg-epoetin β as a horse doping agent.

Type
Short Communication
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Ekblom, B (1996). Blood doping and erythropoietin. The effects of variation in hemoglobin concentration and other related factors on physical performance. The American Journal of Sports Medicine 24: S40S42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2 McKeever, KH, Agans, JM, Geiser, S, Lorimer, PJ and Maylin, GA (2006). Low dose exogenous erythropoietin elicits an ergogenic effect in Standardbred horses. Equine Veterinary Journal, Supplement 36: 233238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3 Catlin, DH and Hatton, CK (2009). Abuse of recombinant erthropoietins by athletes. In: Elliott, SG, Foote, MA and Molineux, G (eds) Erythropoietins, Erythropoietic Factors, and Erythropoiesis. Molecular, Cellular, Preclinical, and Clinical Biology. 2nd edn. Basel: Birkhäuser.Google Scholar
4 Elliott, S (2008). Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents and other methods to enhance oxygen transport. British Journal of Pharmacology 154: 529541.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5 Lasne, F, Martin, L, Martin, JA and de Ceaurriz, J (2009). Detection of continuous erythropoietin receptor activator in blood and urine in anti-doping control. Haematologica 94: 888890.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6 Lasne, F and de Ceaurriz, J (2000). Recombinant erythropoietin in urine. Nature 405: 635.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7 Lasne, F, Martin, L, Crepin, N and de Ceaurriz, J (2002). Detection of isoelectric profiles of erythropoietin in urine: differentiation of natural and administered recombinant hormones. Analytical Biochemistry 311: 119126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8 Lasne, F (2001). Double-blotting: a solution to the problem of non-specific binding of secondary antibodies in immunoblotting procedures. Journal of Immunological Methods 253: 125131.Google Scholar
9 Catlin, DH, Breidbach, A, Elliott, S and Glaspy, J (2002). Comparison of isoelectric focusing patterns of darbepoetin alfa, recombinant human EPO, and endogenous EPO from human urine. Clinical Chemistry 48: 20572059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10 Lasne, F, Popot, MA, Varlet-Marie, E, Martin, L, Martin, JA, Bonnaire, Y, et al. (2005). Detection of recombinant epoetin and darbepoetin alpha after subcutaneous administration in the horse. Journal of Analytical Toxicology 29: 835837.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11 Sato, F, Yamashita, S, Kugo, T, Hasegawa, T, Mitsui, I and Kijima-Suda, I (2004). Nucleotide sequence of equine erythropoietin and characterization of region-specific antibodies. American Journal of Veterinary Research 65: 1519.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12 Kearns, CF, Lenhart, JA and McKeever, KH (2000). Cross-reactivity between human and erythropoietin antibody and horse erythropoietin. Electrophoresis 21: 14541457.3.0.CO;2-G>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13 Lasne, F, Martin, L, Martin, JA and de Ceaurriz, J (2007). Isoelectric profiles of human erythropoietin are different in serum and urine. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 41: 354357.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14 Lamon, S, Giraud, S, Egli, L, Smolander, J, Jarsch, M, Stubenrauch, KG, et al. (2009). A high-throughput test to detect C.E.R.A. doping in blood. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical analysis. doi:10.1016/jpba.2009.06.038.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed