Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-564cf476b6-qxxll Total loading time: 0.304 Render date: 2021-06-21T11:18:58.778Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true }

How We See Others: The Psychobiology of Schemas and Transference

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2014


Social cognition involves automatic and stimulus-driven processes; these may be important in mediating stereotypes in the community and schemas and transference in the clinic setting. Significant differences in self-related processing and other-related processing may also lead to important biases in our view of the other. The psychobiology of social cognition is gradually being delineated, and may be useful in understanding these phenomena, and in responding appropriately. In the clinic, schemas can be rigorously assessed, and schema-focused psychotherapy may be useful in a number of indications.

Pearls in Clinical Neuroscience
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.


1.Westen, D. Transference and information-processing. Clin Psychol Rev. 1988;8:161179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Westen, D, Gabbard, GO. Developments in cognitive neuroscience: II. Implications for theories of transference. J Am Psychoanal Assoc. 2002;50:99134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Levin, FM. Integrating some mind and brain views of transference: the phenomena. J Am Psychoanal Assoc. 1997;45:11211151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Horowitz, MJ, ed. Person Schemas and Maladaptive Interpersonal Patterns. Chicago, Ill: Chicago University Press; 1991.Google Scholar
5.Stein, DJ. Psychoanalysis and cognitive science: contrasting models of the mind. J Am Acad Psychoanal. 1992;20:543559.Google ScholarPubMed
6.Stein, DJ. Cognitive Science and the Unconscious. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press; 1997.Google Scholar
7.Adolphs, R. The neurobiology of social cognition. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2001;11:231239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Mitchell, JP. Contributions of functional neuroimaging to the study of social cognition. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2008;17:142146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Phelps, EA, Thomas, LA. Race, behavior, and the brain: the role of neuroimaging in understanding complex social behaviors. Political Psychology. 2003;24:747758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Stanley, D, Phelps, E, Banaji, M. The neural basis of implicit attitudes. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2008;17:164170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Adolphs, R. The social brain: neural basis of social knowledge. Annu Rev Psychol. 2009;60:693716.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Quadflieg, S, Turk, DJ, Waiter, GD, Mitchell, JP. Jenkins, AC, Macrae, CN. Exploring the neural correlates of social stereotyping. J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Aug 27. [Epub ahead of print].Google ScholarPubMed
13.Luo, Q, Nakic, M, Wheatley, T, Richell, R, Martin, A, Blair, RJ. The neural basis of implicit moral attitude—an IAT study using event-related fMRI. Neuroimage. 2006;30:14491457.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Knutson, KM, Mah, L, Manly, CF, Grafman, J. Neural correlates of automatic beliefs about gender and race. Hum Brain Mapp. 2007;28:915930.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Mitchell, JP, Ames, DL, Jenkins, AC, Banaji, MR. Neural correlates of stereotype application. J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Jun 19. [Epub ahead of print].Google ScholarPubMed
16.Mitchell, JP, Heatherton, TF, Macrae, CN. Distinct neural systems subserve person and object knowledge. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:1523815243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Mason, MF, Banfield, JF, Macrae, CN. Thinking about actions: the neural substrates of person knowledge. Cereb Cortex. 2004;14:209214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Harris, LT, McClure, SM, van den Bos, W, Cohen, JD, Fiske, ST. Regions of the MPFC differentially tuned to social and nonsocial affective evaluation. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2007;7:309316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Pfeifer, JH, Lieberman, MD, Dapretto, M. “I know you are but what am I?!”: neural bases of self- and social knowledge retrieval in children and adults. J Cogn Neurosci. 2007;19:13231337.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.Stein, DJ. What is the self? A psychobiological perspective. CNS Spectr. 2007;12:333336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Stein, DJ. Empathy: at the heart of the mind. CNS Spectr. 2005;10:280283.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22.Jenkins, AC, Macrae, CN, Mitchell, JP. Repetition suppression of ventromedial prefrontal activity during judgments of self and others. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:45074512.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23.Mitchell, JP, Macrae, CN, Banaji, MR. Dissociable medial prefrontal contributions to judgments of similar and dissimilar others. Neuron. 2006;50:655663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Pronin, E. How we see ourselves and how we see others. Science. 2008;320:11771180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Young, JE. Cognitive Therapy for Personality Disorders: A Schema-Focused Approach. Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Exchange; 1994.Google Scholar
26.Bigler, RS, Liben, LS. Developmental intergroup theory: explaining and reducing children's social stereotyping and prejudice. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2007;16:162166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27.Riso, LP, du Toit, PL, Stein, DJ, Young, JE. Cognitive Schemas and Core Beliefs in Psychological Problems: A Scientist-Practitioner Guide. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28.Duchaine, B, Cosmides, L, Tooby, J. Evolutionary psychology and the brain. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2001;11:225230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29.Roth, G, Wullimann, MF. Brain Evolution and Cognition. New York, NY: John Wiley; 2000.Google Scholar
30.Rumelhart, DE, Smolensky, P, McClelland, JL, Hinton, GE. Schemata and sequential thought processes in PDP models. In: McClelland, JL, Rumelhart, DE, eds. Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition. vol 2. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press; 1986:757.Google Scholar
31.Price, JS. Hypothesis: the dominance hierarchy and the evolution of mental illness. Lancet. 1967;2:243246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32.Draper, P, Belsky, J. Personality development in evolutionary perspective. J Pers. 1990;58:141161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33.Buss, DM. Evolutionary personality psychology. Annu Rev Psychol. 1991;45:459491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34.Fazio, RH, Olson, MA. Implicit measures in social cognition research: their meaning and use. Annu Rev Psychol. 2003;54:297327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35.Horvath, AO, Greenberg, LS. Development and validation of the Working Alliance Inventory. J Couns Psychol. 1989;36:223233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36.Hatcher, RL, Gillaspy, JA. Development and validation of a revised short version of the Working Alliance Inventory. Psychotherapy Research. 2006;16:1225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37.Zorn, P, Roder, V, Muller, DR, et al.Schema focused emotive behavioural therapy (‘SET’): a randomised controlled trial on patients with cluster B and C personality disorders [German]. Verhaltenstherapie. 2007;17:233241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38.Giesen-Bloo, J, van Dyck, R, Spinhoven, P, et al.Outpatient psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder: randomized trial of schema-focused therapy vs transference-focused psychotherapy. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006;63:649658.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
39.Hahusseau, S, Pélissolo, A. Behavior and cognitive therapies focused on The Young Personality Disorders Schemas: a pilot study of 14 cases [French]. Encephale. 2006;32(pt 1):298304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
40.Zanarini, MC. Update on pharmacotherapy of borderline personality disorder. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2004;6:6670.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
41.Gerber, AJ, Peterson, BS. Measuring transference phenomena with fMRI. J Am Psychoanal Assoc. 2006;54:13191325.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
42.Beutel, ME, Stern, E, Silbersweig, DA. The emerging dialogue between psychoanalysis and neuroscience: neuroimaging perspectives. J Am Psychoanal Assoc. 2003;51:773801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
43.Stein, DJ, Carey, PD, Warwick, J. Beauty and the beast: psychobiologic and evolutionary perspectives on body dysmorphic disorder. CNS Spectr. 2006;11:419422.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

How We See Others: The Psychobiology of Schemas and Transference
Available formats

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

How We See Others: The Psychobiology of Schemas and Transference
Available formats

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

How We See Others: The Psychobiology of Schemas and Transference
Available formats

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *