Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T12:42:44.518Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

119 Refraction Focus Hallucination: The Role of Increased Excitation at Thalamus in Complex Visual Hallucination

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 June 2018

Chunhui Yang
Affiliation:
Conventions Psychiatry & Counseling, Naperville, IL
Jasir T. Nayati
Affiliation:
St. James School of Medicine, Park Ridge, IL / Anguilla Campus
Khurram Janjua
Affiliation:
Atlantic University School of Medicine, Island Park, N.Y. (St. Lucia Campus)
Asma Ahmed
Affiliation:
Aureus University School of Medicine, Fairlawn, NJ / Aruba Campus
Angela Rekhi
Affiliation:
Aureus University School of Medicine, Fairlawn, NJ / Aruba Campus
Alan R. Hirsch
Affiliation:
Smell & Taste Treatment and Research Foundation, Chicago, IL
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Study Objective(s)

The pathogenesis of complex visual hallucination in patients without visual lesions, appearing with eyes open and resolving with eyes closed, has been described to be associated with increased excitation at the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) and pulvinar of the thalamus (Winton-Brown, 2016). This reduces thefidelity of retinogeniculate transmissions and enhances aberrant projections to the visual cortex. Loss of the central sensory filtering function of the pulvinar increases “signal to noise ratio” in visual transmission. While visual hallucinations have been reported to disappear on eye closure (Manford, 1998), visual aberration with correction with refractionfollowed by focusing on actual visual images and visual hallucinations has not heretofore been reported. Such a case is presented.

Method

Case study: This 28-year-old, myopic, right-handed man, at 5 years of age began hallucinating vivid images of people. The visual hallucinations were triggered only with his eye open. He was myopic and without visual correction, his visual sphere would be blurred. The visual hallucinations were also blurred without visual correction. With refraction, the hallucinations became clearly in focus. He would close his eyes and the visual hallucinations disappeared but would reappear in the same position upon opening his eyes. For over 20 years, he experienced about 100 hallucinations a day. Electroencephalography (EEG) revealed continuous spikes and slow waves in bilateral temporal lobes, consistent with temporal lobe status epilepticus. After treatment with diphenylhydantoin the frequency and duration of the hallucinations markedly decreased to a second epoch every other day. However, the characteristic of the hallucinations remained the same (people).

Results

This phenomenon may involve epilepsy induced excitation of the thalamus. This then acts to reduce the fidelity of retinogeniculate transmission and increase “signal to noise ratio” in visual transmission. This may contribute to complex visual hallucinations with eyes open. The hallucinated figures becoming clearer with eyeglasses provides support that this complex hallucination arises in the pathway from retina-LGN-cortex, not from stored visual associated cortex of top-down cortical release.

Conclusions

Given the above, those with visual hallucinations should be queried as to the influence of refraction on the clarity of hallucination.

Funding

No funding.

Type
Abstracts
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2018