Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T02:13:15.694Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Removal of Heavy Metals from Aqueous Solution Using Natural and Fe(III) Oxyhydroxide Clinoptilolite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Sonja Milićević ,
Vladan Milošević ,
Dragan Povrenović ,
Jovica Stojanović ,
Sanja Martinović  and
Blljana Babić
Sonja Milićević*
Affiliation:
Institute for Technology of Nuclear and Other Mineral Raw Materials, Franchet d’Esperey 86, 11 000, Belgrade, Serbia
Vladan Milošević
Affiliation:
Institute for Technology of Nuclear and Other Mineral Raw Materials, Franchet d’Esperey 86, 11 000, Belgrade, Serbia
Dragan Povrenović
Affiliation:
University of Belgrade, Faculty of Technology and Metallurgy, Karnegijeva 4, 11 000, Belgrade, Serbia
Jovica Stojanović
Affiliation:
Institute for Technology of Nuclear and Other Mineral Raw Materials, Franchet d’Esperey 86, 11 000, Belgrade, Serbia
Sanja Martinović
Affiliation:
Institute for Technology of Nuclear and Other Mineral Raw Materials, Franchet d’Esperey 86, 11 000, Belgrade, Serbia
Blljana Babić
Affiliation:
Institute of Nuclear Science “Vinca”, Materials Science Laboratory, Belgrade, Serbia
*
*E-mail address of corresponding author: s.milicevic@itnms.ac.rs
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The increasing levels of industrial wastewater released to the environment present a serious threat to human health, living resources, and ecological systems. Fe-modified zeolites were developed and tested for removal of Cu2+ and Zn2+ from contaminated water. The surfaces of the naturally occurring zeolite, clinoptilolite, were modified with Fe(III) oxyhydroxides using three different methods, denoted I, II, and III (FeCli1, FeCli2, and FeNaCli1, respectively). The oxyhydroxides were prepared in Method I using 0.1 M FeCl3·6H2O in an acetate buffer (pH = 3.6); in Method II, using 10ai] FeCl3·6H2O solution in 0.1 M KOH (pH = 10); and Method III was the same as Method I except the clinoptilolite was pretreated with NaCl. Newly synthesized materials from these three methods were then tested for their ability to enhance the sorption capacity for Cu and Zn compared to the natural sample (Cli). Powder X-ray diffraction measurements and the chemical composition of these modified samples confirmed that clinoptilolite maintained its structure while amorphous Fe3+ species were synthesized. The specific surface area (BET method) of both the natural and modified clinoptilolite increased by 2 and 7.5 times for Methods I and II, respectively. Scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy revealed that CaO was formed during Method I (FeClii). Throughout the adsorption process, the hydrolysis of CaO and the release of OH− caused the precipitation of Cu and Zn hydroxide, which made the determination of the sorption capacity of FeClii impossible. This phenomenon was avoided in Method III (FeNaClii) because of the absence of exchangeable Ca2+. The adsorption experiments with Method II resulted in double-enchanced adsoprtion capacity. Laboratory batch experiments revealed that the sorption capacities increased in the following order: Cli < FeCli2 < FeNaCli1, for Cu: 0.121 mmol/g < 0.251 mmol/g < 0.403 mmol/g and for Zn: 0.128 mmol/g < 0.234 mmol/g < 0.381 mmol/g.

Keywords

CopperFe-modificationSorption CapacityZeoliteZinc
Type
Research Article
Information
Clays and Clay Minerals , Volume 61 , Issue 6 , December 2013 , pp. 508 - 516
Copyright
Copyright © Clay Minerals Society 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahluwalia, S.S. and Goyal, D., 2008 Biosorption of Cu(II) from aqueous solution by Fucus serratus: Surface characterization and sorption mechanisms. Bioresource Technology 99 6150–6155.Google Scholar
Ajmal, M. Rao, R. and Ahmad, J., 2000 from electroplating wastewater. Journal of Hazardous Materials 79 117–131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Amana, T. Kazi, A.A. Sabri, M.U. and Banoa, Q., 2008 Potato peels as solid waste for the removal of heavy metal copper (II) from waste water/industrial effluent Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces 63 16–121.Google Scholar
Barakat, M.A., 2011 New trends in removing heavy metals from industrial wastewater Arabian Journal of Chemistry 4 361–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barret, E.P. Joyner, L.G. and Halenda, P.P., 1951 The determination of pore volume and area distributions in porous substances. I. Computations from nitrogen isotherms Journal of the American Chemical Society 73 373–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crini, G., 2005 Recent developments in polysaccharide-based materials used as adsorbents in wastewater treatment Progress in Polymer Science 30 38–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimirkou, A. Ioannou, A. and Kalliannou, C., 1996 Synthesis-identification of hematite and kaolinite-hematite system Communication in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 27 1091–1106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimirkou, A. Ioannou, A. and Doula, M., 2008 Preparation, characterization and sorption properties for phosphates of hematite, bentonite and bentonite-hematite systems Advances in Colloid and Interface Science 97 37–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doula, M. Ioannou, A. and Dimirkou, A., 2002 Copper adsorption and Si, Al, Ca, Mg, and Na release from clinoptilolite Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 245 237–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doula, M., 2006 Removal of Mn2+ ions from drinking water by using clinoptilolite and a clinoptilolite-Fe oxide system Water Research 40 3167–3176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doula, M., 2007 Synthesis of a clinoptilolite-Fe system with the high Cu sorption capacity Chemosphere 67 731–740.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gottardi, G. and Galli, E., 1985 General information on zeolites Natural Zeolites 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, J.B. Weed, S.B. Schwertmann, U. and Taylor, R.M., 1989.Iron Oxides SSSA Book SeriesGoogle Scholar
Habuda-Stanić, M. Kalajdžić, B. Kuleš, M. and Velić, N., 2008 Arsenite and arsenate sorption by hydrous ferric oxide/polymeric material. Desalination 229 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, R. Zou, L. Zhao, X. Xu, Y. Xu, F. Li, Y. and Wang, Y., 2009 Characterization and properties of iron oxide-coated zeolite as adsorbent for removal of copper(II) from solution in a fixed bed column. Chemical Engineering Journal 149 123–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Standard ISO 9277, 2010 Determination of the specific surface area of solids by gas adsorption - BET method .Google Scholar
Jeon, C.S. Baek, K. Park, J.K. Oh, Y.K. and Lee, S.D., 2009 Adsorption characteristics of As(V) on iron-coated zeolite. Journal of Hazardous Materials 163 804–808.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaneko, K. Ishii, C. Ruike, M. and Kuwabara, H., 1992 Origin of superhigh surface area and microcrystalline graphitic structures of activated carbons. Carbon 30 1075–1088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaneko, K. Ishii, C. Kanoh, H. Hanzawa, Y S N and Suzuki, T., 1998 Characterization of porous carbons with high resolution αs-analysis and low temperature magnetic susceptibility. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science 76-77 295–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khaled, E.M. and Stucki, J.W., 1991 Iron oxidation state effects on cation fixation in smectites. Soil Science Society of America Journal 55 550–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kragovic, M. Dakovic, A. Milicevic, S. Sekulic, Z. and Milonjic, S., 2009 Influence of organic cations sorption on the point of zero charge of natural zeolite Hemijska Industrija 63 325–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kragovic, M. Dakovic, A. Milicevic, S. Sekulic, Z. Trgo, M. Peric, J. Vukojevic Medvidovic, N. Ugrina, M. and Nuic, I., 2010 Immobilization of lead from aqueous solutions using the natural and Fe(III) modified zeolite. Proceedings, 3rd Croatian-Slovenian Symposium on Zeolites 89–92.Google Scholar
Kruk, M. Jaroniec, M. and Gadakaree, K.P., 1997 Nitrogen adsorption studies of novel synthetic active carbons. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 192 250–256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kurniawan, T.A. Chan, G.Y.S. Lo, W. and Babel, S., 2006 Comparisons of low-cost adsorbents for treating wastewaters laden with heavy metals. Science of the Total Environment 366 409–426.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kurniawan, T.A. Chan, G.Y.S. Lo, W.H. and Babel, S., 2006 Physico-chemical treatment techniques for wastewater laden with heavy metals. Chemical Engineering Journal 118 83–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowell, S. Shields, J.E. Thomas, M.A. and Thommes, M., 2004 Characterization of Porous Solids and Powders: Surface Area, Pore Size and Density..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morturano, P. Drozdova, L. Pirngruber, D. Kogelbauer, A. and Prins, R., 2001 The mechanism of formation of the Fe species in Fe/ZSM-5 prepared by CVD. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 3 5585–5595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mustafa, G. Singh, B. and Kookana, R.S., 2004 Cadmium adsorption and desorption behaviour on goethite at low equilibrium concentrations: effects of pH and index cations. Chemosphere 57 1325–1333.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palmer, J.L. and Gunter, M.E., 2001 The effects of time, temperature, and concentration on Sr2+ exchange in clinoptilolite in aqueous solutions. American Mineralogist 86 431–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Passaglia, E. Sheppard, R.A., Bish, D.L. and Ming, D.W., 2001 The crystal chemistry of zeolites Natural Zeolites: Occurrence, Properties, Application 69–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sciban, M. Radetic, B. Kevresanin, Z. and Klasnja, M., 2007 Adsorption of heavy metals from electroplating wastewater by wood sawdust. Bioresource Technology 98 402–409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shek, T.H. Ma, A. Lee, V.K.C. and McKay, G., 2009 Kinetics of zinc ions removal from effluents using ion exchange resin. Chemical Engineering Journal 146 63–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sing, K.S.W. Everett, D.H. Haul, R.A.W. Moscou, L. Pierotti, R.A. and Rouquerol, J., 1985 Reporting physi-sorption data for gas/solid systems with special reference to the determination of surface area and porosity. Pure and Applied Chemistry 57 603–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sljivic, M. Smiciklas, I. Pejanovic, S. and Plecas, I., 2009 Comparative study of Cu2+ adsorption on a zeolite, a clay and a diatomite from Serbia. Applied Clay Science 43 33–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Top, A. and Ülkü, S., 2004 Silver, zinc, and copper exchange in a Na-clinoptilolite and resulting effect on antibacterial activity. Applied Clay Science 27 13–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ugrina, M. Trgo, M. Peric, J. Dakovic, A V M N Nuic, I. Milicevic, S. Sekulic, Z. and Kragovic, M., 2010 Uptake of zinc ions on iron-coated zeolite clinoptilolite. Abstracts, 8th International Conference on the Occurrence, Properties, and Utilization of Natural Zeolites 268–269.Google Scholar
Wan Ngah, W.S. and Isa, L.M., 1998 Comparison study of copper ion adsorption on chitosan, Dowex A-l, and Zerolit 225. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 67 1067–1070.3.0.CO;2-Y>CrossRefGoogle Scholar