Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T00:08:40.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of a Water Phase on the Swelling Pressure and Water Retention of an Unsaturated Bentonite–Sand Mixture with Insignificant Osmotic Suction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Lin Zhi Lang  and
Wiebke Baille
Lin Zhi Lang*
Affiliation:
School of Engineering and Technology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing, China
Wiebke Baille
Affiliation:
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany
*
e-mail: Linzhi.Lang@cugb.edu.cn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Compacted bentonite–sand mixture is proposed widely as backfill in geological repositories for disposal of radioactive waste in many countries because this material has significant swelling capacity and low water permeability. Development of the swelling pressure of backfills upon hydration is related closely to the stability of the host rock in the geological repository. No systematic experimental studies have been carried out to explore the effect of a water phase on the swelling pressure and water retention of bentonite–sand mixtures with insignificant osmotic suction. The objective of the current study was to examine experimentally the influence of a water phase involving liquid water and water vapor on swelling pressure and water retention of a bentonite–sand mixture with insignificant osmotic suction. Swelling-pressure tests with suction control and water-retention measurements under constant-volume conditions were performed on the compacted bentonite–sand mixture with a dry density of 1.80 g/cm3. Osmotic and vapor equilibrium techniques were used to make identical specimens adsorb liquid water and water vapor, respectively. The experimental results showed that the water phase had almost no effect on the swelling-pressure patterns of the unsaturated bentonite–sand mixture upon hydration over a suction range from 27 to 3 MPa. The swelling pressure increased significantly with decreasing suction from 27 to 3 MPa, regardless of the mixture adsorbing either the liquid water or water vapor. Nevertheless, the water phase had a considerable impact on both the swelling pressure and water retention of the unsaturated bentonite–sand mixture upon hydration over the same suction range. For a given value of suction in the range above, the swelling pressure and the water content of the bentonite–sand upon adsorption of liquid water were greater than those upon adsorption of water vapor. The influence of the water phase on the swelling pressure and the water retention of the bentonite–sand mixture with insignificant osmotic suction is related mainly to the hydration or swelling mechanism of Ca-rich bentonite.

Keywords

Bentonite–sand mixtureGeological repositorySwelling pressureWater retention
Type
Original Paper
Information
Clays and Clay Minerals , Volume 70 , Issue 6 , December 2022 , pp. 934 - 945
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to The Clay Minerals Society 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor: Michael Ploetze

References

Agus, S. S. (2005). An experimental study on hydro-mechanical characteristics of compacted bentonite-sand mixtures. Bauhaus-University Weimar.Google Scholar
Agus, S. S., & Schanz, T. (2005). Effect of shrinking and swelling on microstructures and fabric of a compacted bentonite-sand mixture. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of International Conference on Problematic Soils GEOPROB 2005 (pp 543–550). Eastern Mediterranean University Press.Google Scholar
Agus, S., Arifin, Y., Tripathy, S., & Schanz, T. (2013). Swelling pressure-suction relationship of heavily compacted bentonite-sand mixtures. Acta Geotechnica, 8, 155–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arifin, Y. F. (2008). Thermo-hydro-mechanical behavior of compacted bentonite-sand mixtures: An experimental study. Bauhaus-University Weimar.Google Scholar
Arifin, Y. F., & Schanz, T. (2009). Osmotic suction of highly plastic clays. Acta Geotechnica, 4, 177–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ASTM-D6836. (2003). Standard test methods for determination of the soil water chararcteristic curve for desorption using a hanging column, pressure extractor, chilled mirror hygrometer, and/or centrifuge. Pp., ASTM International.Google Scholar
Ballew, H. W., Clark, D., Crooks, G., Ho, S. V., Markee, C., Martinez, F. J., Milner, D., Partee, J., & Simmons, J. (2002). The abc's of filtration and bioprocessing for the third millennium. Spectum Laboratories Inc.Google Scholar
Bucher, F., & Müller-Vonmoos, M. (1989). Bentonite as a containment barrier for the disposal of highly radioactive wastes. Applied Clay Science, 4, 157–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castellanos, E., Villar, M. V., Romero, E., Lloret, A., & Gens, A. (2008). Chemical impact on the hydro-mechanical behaviour of high-density FEBEX bentonite. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 33, S516–S526.Google Scholar
Cui, Y. J., Loiseau, C., & Delage, P. (2002). Microstructure changes of a confined swelling soil due to suction controlled hydration. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 3nd International Conference on Unsaturated Soils (pp. 593–598).Google Scholar
Cuisinier, O., & Masrouri, F. (2005). Hydromechanical behaviour of a compacted swelling soil over a wide suction range. Engineering Geology, 81, 204–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Decagon Devices, I. (2003). Water activity meter operator's manual for aqualab series 3. (pp. 48–57). Decagon Devices, Inc.Google Scholar
Delage, P., Howat, M. D., & Cui, Y. J. (1998). The relationship between suction and swelling properties in a heavily compacted unsaturated clay. Engineering Geology, 50, 31–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delage, P., Romero, E., & Tarantino, A. (2008). Recent developments in the techniques of controlling and measuring suction in unsaturated soils. In Toll, D. G., Augarde, C. E., Gallipoli, D., & Wheeler, S. J. (Eds.), Unsaturated soils. Advances in geo-engineering (pp. 44–63). CRC Press.Google Scholar
Haynes, H. M., Bailey, M. T., & Lloyd, J. R. (2021). Bentonite barrier materials and the control of microbial processes: Safety case implications for the geological disposal of radioactive waste. Chemical Geology, 581, 120353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jobmann, M., Flgge, J., Gazul, R., Hammer, J., Herold, P., Krone, J., Kuate Simo, E., Khnlenz, T., Laggiard, E., Lommerzheim, A., Meleshyn, A., Mller, C., Rbel, A., Wolf, J., & Zhao, H. (2017). Investigation on long-term safety aspects of a radioactive waste repository in a diagenetic clay formation (pp. 47–58). DBE Technology GmbH.Google Scholar
Kassiff, G., & Shalom, A. B. (1971). Experimental relationship between swell pressure and suction. Geotechnique, 21, 245–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Komine, H., & Ogata, N. (2003). New equations for swelling characteristics of bentonite-based buffer materials. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 40, 460–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laird, D. A. (2006). Influence of layer charge on swelling of smectites. Applied Clay Science, 34, 74–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lang, L. Z. (2019). Hydro-mechanical behaviour of bentonitebased materials used for disposal of radioactive wastes. Ruhr-Universität Bochum.Google Scholar
Lang, L. Z., Tripathy, S., Baille, W., Schanz, T., & Sridharan, A. (2019). Linkage between swelling pressure, total suction of saturated bentonites and suction of saturating aqueous solutions. Applied Clay Science, 171, 82–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leong, E.-C., Tripathy, S., & Rahardjo, H. (2003). Total suction measurement of unsaturated soils with a device using the chilled-mirror dew-point technique. Geotechnique, 53, 173–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liang, W.-Y., Yan, R.-T., Xu, Y.-F., Zhang, Q., Tian, H.-H., & Wei, C.-F. (2021). Swelling pressure of compacted expansive soil over a wide suction range. Applied Clay Science, 203, 106018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, L. (2013). Prediction of swelling pressures of different types of bentonite in dilute solutions. Colloids and Surfaces a: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 434, 303–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloret, A., Villar, M. V., Sanchez, M., Gens, A., Pintado, X., & Alonso, E. E. (2003). Mechanical behaviour of heavily compacted bentonite under high suction changes. Geotechnique, 53, 27–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madsen, F. T. (1998). Clay mineralogical investigations related to nuclear waste disposal. Clay Minerals, 33, 109–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manca, D., Ferrari, A., & Laloui, L. (2015). Fabric evolution and the related swelling behaviour of a sand/bentonite mixture upon hydro-chemo-mechanical loadings. Geotechnique, 66, 41–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD. (2003). Engineered barrier systerms and the safety of deep geological reporsitories-state-of-the-art report (pp. 9–36). OECD and Nuclear Energy Agency.Google Scholar
Pintado, X., Hassan, M. M., & Martikainen, J. (2013). Thermohydro-mechanical tests of buffer material (pp. 20–86). Posiva Oy.Google Scholar
Pusch, R. (1980). Swelling pressure of highly compacted bentonite (pp. 3–35). SKB.Google Scholar
Pusch, R. (1994). Waste disposal in rock. Elsevier.Google Scholar
Pusch, R., & Yong, R. N. (2006). Microstructure of smectite clays and engineering performance. CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawat, A., Baille, W., & Tripathy, S. (2019). Swelling behavior of compacted bentonite-sand mixture during water infiltration. Engineering Geology, 257, 105141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romero, E. (1999). Characterisation and thermo-hydromechanical behaviour of unsaturated boom clay: An experimental study. Universitat Politécnica de Catalunya.Google Scholar
Rothfuchs, T., Hartwig, O. C. L., Hellwald, K., Komischke, M., Miehe, R., & Zhang, C. L. (2012). Self-sealing barriers of clay/mineral mixtures in a clay repository: Sb experiment in the mont terri rock laboratory (pp. 11–65). Gesellschaft für Anlagen-und Reaktorsicherheit (GRS).Google Scholar
Saiyouri, N., Hicher, P. Y., & Tessier, D. (2000). Microstructural approach and transfer water modelling in highly compacted unsaturated swelling clays. Mechanics of Cohesive-Frictional Materials, 5, 41–60.3.0.CO;2-N>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saiyouri, N., Tessier, D., & Hicher, P.-Y. (2004). Experimental study of swelling in unsaturated compacted clays. Clay Minerals, 39, 469–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salles, F., Bildstein, O., Douillard, J. M., Jullien, M., Raynal, J., & Van Damme, H. (2010). On the cation dependence of interlamellar and interparticular water and swelling in smectite clays. Langmuir, 26, 5028–5037.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schanz, T., & Al-Badran, Y. (2014). Swelling pressure characteristics of compacted chinese gaomiaozi bentonite gmz01. Soils and Foundations, 54, 748–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schanz, T. & Tripathy, S. (2009). Swelling pressure of a divalent-rich bentonite: Diffuse double-layer theory revisited. Water Resources Research, 45, W00C12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sellin, P., & Leupin, O. X. (2013). The use of clay as an engineered barrier in radioactive-waste management–a review. Clays and Clay Minerals, 61, 477–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tripathy, S., & Rees, S. (2013). Suction of some polyethylene glycols commonly used for unsaturated soil testing. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 36, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tripathy, S., Thomas, H., & Bag, R. (2017). Geoenvironmental application of bentonites in underground disposal of nuclear waste: Characterization and laboratory tests. Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste, 21, D4015002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Olphen, H. H. (1977). An introduction to clay colloid chemistry: For clay technologists, geologists, and soil scientists (2nd ed.). Wiley.Google Scholar
Wang, H., Komine, H. & Gotoh, T. (2021). A swelling pressure cell for x-ray diffraction test. Geotechnique, 0, 1–12.Google Scholar
Wang, Q., Cui, Y.-J., Tang, A. M., Delage, P., Gatmiri, B., & Ye, W.-M. (2014). Long-term effect of water chemistry on the swelling pressure of a bentonite-based material. Applied Clay Science, 87, 157–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Q., Tang, A. M., Cui, Y.-J., Barnichon, J.-D., & Ye, W.-M. (2013a). Investigation of the hydro-mechanical behaviour of compacted bentonite/sand mixture based on the bexm model. Computers and Geotechnics, 54, 46–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Q., Tang, A. M., Cui, Y.-J., Delage, P., Barnichon, J.-D., & Ye, W.-M. (2013b). The effects of technological voids on the hydro-mechanical behaviour of compacted bentonite-sand mixture. Soils and Foundations, 53, 232–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xiang, G., & Ye, W. (2020). Swelling of bentonite-sand mixtures after long-term dissolution in alkaline solution. Clays and Clay Minerals, 68, 491–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yigzaw, Z., Cuisinier, O., Massat, L., & Masrouri, F. (2016). Role of different suction components on swelling behavior of compacted bentonites. Applied Clay Science, 120, 81–90.Google Scholar
Yong, R. N., Pusch, R., & Nakano, M. (2010). Containment of high-level radioactive and hazardous solid wastes with clay barriers. Spon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeng, Z., Cui, Y.-J., & Talandier, J. (2021). Effect of water chemistry on the hydro-mechanical behaviour of compacted mixtures of claystone and na/ca-bentonites for deep geological repositories. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 14, 527–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Z., Ye, W.-M., Liu, Z.-R., Wang, Q., & Cui, Y.-J. (2020). Mechanical behavior of gmz bentonite pellet mixtures over a wide suction range. Engineering Geology, 264, 105383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, C.-M., Ye, W.-M., Chen, Y.-G., Chen, B., & Cui, Y.-J. (2013). Influence of salt solutions on the swelling pressure and hydraulic conductivity of compacted gmz01 bentonite. Engineering Geology, 166, 74–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar