Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T02:13:33.591Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Characterization of the Second Package of the Alternative Buffer Material (ABM) Experiment — II Exchangeable Cation Population Rearrangement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

R. Dohrmann  and
S. Kaufhold
R. Dohrmann*
Affiliation:
Bundesanstalt für Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe (BGR), Stilleweg 2, D-30655, Hannover, Germany Landesamt für Bergbau, Energie und Geologie (LBEG), Stilleweg 2, D-30655, Hannover, Germany
S. Kaufhold
Affiliation:
Bundesanstalt für Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe (BGR), Stilleweg 2, D-30655, Hannover, Germany
*
*E-mail address of corresponding author: reiner.dohrmann@lbeg.niedersachsen.de
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Bentonites are candidate materials for encapsulating radioactive waste within barrier systems in crystalline rocks. In the ‘Alternative Buffer Material’ (ABM) test in the hard rock laboratory in Äspö, Sweden, six packages of eleven different buffer materials (mainly bentonites) with various exchangeable cation populations were packed vertically with an iron tube used as a heater in the center. After installation, the second ‘ABM package’ (ABM-II) was first allowed to saturate with water for approximately 2.5 years. The blocks were then exposed to a temperature of up to 141°C for approximately 3–4 years. The hypotheses for the present study were: (1) no horizontal gradient of the cation exchange population was present in the individual blocks of ABM-II because ABM-II had a longer reaction time in comparison to the ABM-I package, which did not have horizontal gradients; (2) the exchangeable cation Ca2+:Na+:Mg2+ ratio was equal in all blocks of ABM-II and was independent of block position in the package. As expected from ABM-I, all blocks in the ABM-II experiment showed large differences between the measured values of the reference materials and the reacted samples. The exchangeable Na+ and Mg2+ values in ABM-II were reduced by up to 55% to 59% in comparison to the reference material. Contrary to the first hypothesis, horizontal gradients were observed in ABM-II; and, contrary to the second hypothesis, the exchangeable cation ratios differed markedly in the different reacted buffer materials. The largest total Na+ loss was observed in the middle part (-67%), whereas Mg2+ values decreased by 79% in the upper part. The exchangeable Ca2+ values increased strongly in ABM-II, particularly in the upper part. The most useful parameter to distinguish between ion exchange equilibria of ABM-I and ABM-II was the Na+/Mg2+ ratio. This ratio was constant in ABM-I (3.0) and had a similar ratio (3.5) in the lower part of ABM-II; however, the ratio strongly increased (5–10) in the upper part of the ABM-II package. The large Na+/Mg2+ ratios in the upper part of ABM-II could possibly be explained by water loss into the rock (caused by a pressure drop and boiling) and subsequent water uptake.

Keywords

Bentonite BufferBoilingCECCu-trien5xcalciteExchangeable Cation Population
Type
Article
Information
Clays and Clay Minerals , Volume 65 , Issue 2 , April 2017 , pp. 104 - 121
Copyright
Copyright © Clay Minerals Society 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Balmer, S. Kaufhold, S. and Dohrmann, R., 2017 Cementbentonite-iron interactions on small scale tests for testing performance of bentonites as a barrier in high-level radioactive waste repository concepts Applied Clay Science 135 427–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourg, I.C. Sposito, G. and Bourg, A.C.M., 2006 Tracer diffusion in compacted, water-saturated bentonite Clays and Clay Minerals 54 363–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, D.A. Martino, J.B. Vigna, I.B. Masumoto, K. and Fujita, T., 2007 Overview of the evolution, performance and state of a bentonite-based tunnel seal after 5 years of operation Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 32 741–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dohrmann, R., 2006 Cation Exchange Capacity Methodology III: Correct exchangeable calcium determination of calcareous clays using a new silver-thiourea method Applied Clay Science 34 47–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dohrmann, R. Genske, D. Karnland, O. Kaufhold, S. Kiviranta, L. Olsson, S. Plötze, M. Sandén, T. Sellin, P. Svensson, D. and Valter, M., 2012a Interlaboratory exchange of CEC and exchangeable cation results of bentonite buffer material I. Cu(II)-triethylenetetramine method. Clays and Clay Minerals 60 162–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dohrmann, R. Genske, D. Karnland, O. Kaufhold, S. Kiviranta, L. Olsson, S. Plötze, M. Sandén, T. Sellin, P. Svensson, D. and Valter, M., 2012b Interlaboratory exchange of CEC and exchangeable cation results of bentonite buffer material II. Alternative methods. Clays and Clay Minerals 60 176–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dohrmann, R. and Kaufhold, S., 2009 Three new, quick CEC methods for determining the amounts of exchangeable calcium cations in calcareous clays Clays and Clay Minerals 57 338–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dohrmann, R. and Kaufhold, S., 2010 Determination of exchangeable calcium of calcareous and gypsiferous bentonites Clays and Clay Minerals 58 513–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dohrmann, R. Kaufhold, S. and Lundqvist, B., 2013a. The role of clays for safe storage of nuclear waste Handbook of Clay Science, Techniques and Applications 5B 677–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dohrmann, R. Olsson, S. Kaufhold, S. and Sellin, P., 2013b Mineralogical investigations of the first package of the alternative buffer material test — II Exchangeable cation population rearrangement. Clay Minerals 48 215–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dohrmann, R. and Kaufhold, S., 2014 Cation exchange and mineral reactions observed in MX 80 buffers samples of the prototype repository in situ experiment in Äspö, Sweden Clays and Clay Minerals 62 357–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elert, K. Pardo, E.S. and Rodriguez-Navarro, C., 2015 Mineralogical evolution of di- and trioctahedral smectites in highly alkaline environments Clays and Clay Minerals 63 414–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eng, A. Nilsson, U. and Svensson, D., 2007.Äspö Hard Rock Laboratory, Alternative Buffer Material Installation report IPR-07-15Google Scholar
Ferrage, E., 2016 Investigation of the interlayer organization of water and ions in smectite from the combined use of diffraction experiments and molecular simulations. A review of methodology, applications, and perspectives. Clays and Clay Minerals, 64, 348–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fröhlich, D.R., 2015 Sorption of neptunium on clays and clay minerals — A review Clays and Clay Minerals 63 262–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gómez-Espina, R. and Villar, M.V., 2016 Time evolution of MX-80 bentonite geochemistry under thermo-hydraulic gradients Clay Minerals 51 145–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grolimund, D. Wersin, P. Brendlé, J. Huve, J. Kiviranta, L. and Snellman, M., 2016 Interaction of titanium with smectite within the scope of a spent fuel repository: A spectroscopic approach Clay Minerals 51 249–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmboe, M. and Bourg, I.C., 2013 Molecular dynamics simulations of water and sodium diffusion in smectite interlayer nanopores as a function of pore size and temperature The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 118 1001–1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmboe, M. Wold, S. and Jonsson, M., 2010 Colloid diffusion in compacted bentonite: microstructural constraints Clays and Clay Minerals 58 532–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ishidera, T. Kurosawa, S. Hayashi, M. Uchikoshi, K. and Beppu, H., 2016 Diffusion and retention behaviour of Cs in illite-added compacted montmorillonite Clay Minerals 51 161–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johannesson, L.-E. Börgesson, L. Goudarzi, R. Sandén, T. Gunnarsson, D. and Svemar, C., 2007 Prototype repository: A full-scale experiment at Äspö HRL Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 32 58–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karnland, O. Olsson, S. and Nilsson, U., 2006.Mineralogy and Sealing Properties of Various Bentonites and Smectiterich Clay MaterialsGoogle Scholar
Kaufhold, S. and Dohrmann, R., 2008 Detachment of colloids from bentonites in water Applied Clay Science 39 50–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufhold, S. and Dohrmann, R., 2016 Assessment of parameters to distinguish suitable from less suitable highlevel-radioactive waste bentonites Clay Minerals 51 289–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufhold, S. Dohrmann, R. Koch, D. and Houben, G., 2008 The pH of aqueous bentonite suspensions Clays and Clay Minerals 56 338–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufhold, S. Dohrmann, R. Sandén, T. Sellin, P. and Svensson, D., 2013 Mineralogical investigations of the alternative buffer material test — I. Alteration of bentonites Clay Minerals 48 199–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufhold, S. Dohrmann, R. and Ufer, K., 2016 Interaction of magnesium cations with dioctahedral smectites under HLRW repository conditions Clays and Clay Minerals 64 743–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufhold, S. Dohrmann, R. Götze, N. and Svensson, D., 2017a Characterization of the second parcel of the alternative buffer material (ABM) experiment — I mineralogical reactions Clays and Clay Minerals 65 27–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufhold, S. Dohrmann, R. and Gröger-Trampe, J., 2017b.Reaction of native copper in contact with pyrite and bentonite in anaerobic water at elevated temperature. Corrosion Engineering, Science and TechnologyCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufhold, S. Sanders, D. Hassel, A.-W. and Dohrmann, R., 2015 Corrosion of high-level radioactive waste ironcanisters in contact with bentonite Journal of Hazardous Materials 285 464–473.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaufhold, S. Stucki, J.W. Finck, N. Steininger, R. Zimina, A. Dohrmann, R. Ufer, K. Pentrák, M. and Pentráková, L., 2017c Tetrahedral charge and Fe-content in dioctahedral smectites Clay Minerals 52 51–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, L.M. Seiphoori, A. Gasser, P. Lucas, F. Holzer, L. and Ferrari, A., 2014 The pore structure of compacted and partly saturated MX-80 bentonite at different dry densities Clays and Clay Minerals 62 174–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerisit, S. Okumura, M. Rosso, K. and Mashida, M., 2016 Molecular simulation of cesium adsorption at the basal surface of phyllosilicate minerals Clays and Clay Minerals 64 389–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klika, Z. Seidlerová, J. Valášková, M. Kliková, C. and Kolomazník, I., 2016 Uptake of Ce(III) and Ce(IV) on montmorillonite Applied Clay Science 132-133 41–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kosec, T. Qin, Z. Chen, J. Legat, A. and Shoesmith, D.W., 2015 Copper corrosion in bentonite/saline groundwater solution: Effects of solution and bentonite chemistry Corrosion Science 90 248–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumpulainen, S. and Kiviranta, L., 2011 Mineralogical, chemical and physical study of potential buffer and backfill materials from ABM test package 1. Posiva Working Report 2011–41 Finland Posiva Oy, Olkiluoto.Google Scholar
Kumpulainen, S. Kiviranta, L. and Korkeakoski, P., 2016 Long-term effects of Fe-heater and \:Asp\:o groundwater on smectite clays — Chemical and hydromechanical results from in situ alternative buffer material (ABM) test package 2 Clay Minerals 51 129–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayordomo, N. Degueldre, C. Alonso, U. and Missana, T., 2016 Size distribution of FEBEX bentonite colloids upon fast disaggregation in low ionic strength water Clay Minerals 51 213–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, L.P. and Kahr, G., 1999 Determination of the cation exchange capacity (CEC) of clay minerals using the complexes of copper (II) ion with triethylenetetramine and tetraethylenepentamine Clays and Clay Minerals 47 386–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Missana, T. Alonso, U. Albarran, N. García-Gutiírrez, M. and Cormenzana, J.-L., 2011 Analysis of colloids erosion from the bentonite barrier of a high level radioactive waste repository and implications in safety assessment Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C 36 1607–1615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsson, S. and Karnland, O., 2011 Mineralogical and chemical characteristics of the bentonite in the A2 test parcel of the LOT field experiments at \:Asp\:o HRL, Sweden Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 36 1545–1553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, Y. Zhang, H. Yang, B. Wang, X. Shao, X. and Liu, P., 2016 Ice-bentonite powder mixing method to improve the homogeneity of compacted bentonite in an initial sample preparation stage Clays and Clay Minerals 64 706–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plötze, M. Kahr, G. Dohrmann, R. and Weber, H., 2007 Hydro-mechanical, geochemical and mineralogical characteristics of the bentonite buffer in a heater experiment The HE-B project at the Mont Terri rock laboratory. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 32 730–740.Google Scholar
Rivard, C. Pelletier, M. Michau, N. Razafitianamaharavo, A. Abdelmoula, M. Ghanbaja, J. and Villiéras, F., 2016 Reactivity of Callovo-Oxfordian claystone and its clay fraction with metallic iron: Role of non-clay minerals in the interaction mechanism Clays and Clay Minerals 63 290–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samper, J. Naves, A. Montenegro, L. and Mon, A., 2016 Reactive transport modelling of the long-term interactions of corrosion products and compacted bentonite in a HLW repository in granite: Uncertainties and relevance for performance assessment Applied Geochemistry 67 42–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sasamoto, H. Isogai, B. Kikuchi, H. Satoh, H. and Svensson, D., 2017 Mineralogical, physical and chemical investigation of compacted Kunigel V1 bentonite in contact with a steel heater in the ABM test package 1 experiment, Äspö laboratory, Sweden Clay Minerals 52 127–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sellin, P. and Leupin, O., 2014 The use of clay as an engineered barrier in radioactive waste management — a review Clays and Clay Minerals 61 477–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SKB (2007) RD&D Programme 2007. Programme for research, development and demonstration of methods for the management and disposal of nuclear waste. TR-07–12, Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Company (SKB), Stockholm, Sweden. . SKB (2014) Äspö Hard Rock Laboratory, Annual Report 2013.Google Scholar
TR-14-17, Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Company (SKB), Stockholm, Sweden. .Google Scholar
Stanjek, H. and Künkel, D., 2016 CEC determination with Cutriethylenetetramine: recommendations for improving reproducibility and accuracy Clay Minerals 51 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svensson, D. Dueck, A. Nilsson, U. Olsson, S. Sandén, T. Lydmark, S. Jägerwall, S. Pedersen, K. and Hansen, S., 2011.Alternative Buffer Material. Status of the Ongoing Laboratory Investigation of Reference Materials and Test Package 1Google Scholar
Szakálos, P. and Seetharaman, S., 2012.Corrosion of Copper. Technical Note 2012:17Google Scholar
Tournassat, C. Bourg, I. Holmboe, M. Sposito, G. and Steefel, C.I., 2016 Molecular dynamics simulations of anion exclusion in clay interlayer nanopores Clays and Clay Minerals 64 74–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Geet, M. and Dohrmann, R., 2016 Overview of the clay mineralogy studies presented at the ‘Clays in natural and engineered barriers for radioactive waste confinement’ meeting, Brussels, March 2015 Clay Minerals 51 125–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallis, I. Idiart, A. Dohrmann, R. and Post, V., 2016 Reactive transport modelling of groundwater-bentonite interaction: effects on exchangeable cations in an alternative buffer material in-situ test Applied Geochemistry 73 59–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wersin, P. and Birgersson, M., 2014 Reactive transport modelling of iron-bentonite interaction within the KBS- 3H disposal concept: the Olkiluoto site as a case study Geological Society, London, Special Publications 2014 400 237–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wersin, P. Jenni, A. and Mäder, U.K., 2015 Interaction of corroding iron with bentonite in the ABM1 Experiment at Äspö, Sweden: A microscopic approach Clays and Clay Minerals 63 51–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar