Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-rkxrd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T19:00:30.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Anatase and Rutile Determination in Kaolinite Deposits

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2024

Mahmut Sayin
Affiliation:
Department of Soil Science, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, U.S.A.
M. L. Jackson
Affiliation:
Department of Soil Science, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, U.S.A.

Abstract

Hexafluorotitanic acid (H2TiF6) selectively dissolves kaolinite and most other phyllosilicate minerals of soils and sediments, concentrating free crystalline (Ti,Fe)O2 minerals (partially substituted anatase and rutile) in the residue. A series of H2TiF6 reagents was standardized by analysis of the Ti content and by tests with pure anatase and commercial kaolinites. The Ti in the H2TiF6 solution selected (made from 49% HF + reagent TiO2) was 16·5% by weight as analyzed by the Tiron method. Treatment of pure anatase with the reagent H2TiF6 resulted in a 98% by weight recovery of TiO2 in the residue. The fraction of TiO2 recovered in the residue of commercial Georgia kaolinites was 88–101% after treatment with the selected H2TiF6 reagent. Isolates from nine Georgia kaolinite samples with varying amounts of TiO2 and Fe2O3 were examined by X-ray powder diffraction, scanning electron microscopy and elemental analysis. The main constituent of the (Ti,Fe)O2 isolates was anatase for all samples, with minor amounts of coarser rutile and mica from coarser kaolinite. The anatase and rutile isolates contained 74–93% (Ti,Fe)O2 with 0·5–3·1% Fe. The other constituents of the isolates were muscovite of mica (0·3–7%), quartz (0–9%) and amorphous relics of vermiculite and/or kaolinite (6–19%). Rutile, muscovite and quartz appear to be detrital but the anatase and relics are probably authigenic. Fine anatase appears to stick on the muscovite flakes as revealed by scanning electron microscopy and heavy liquid data for separation of these two minerals. The (Ti,Fe)O2 isolates from kaolinites which passed with the first magnetic concentrate of anatase were coarse, on the order of a few microns dia., as revealed by the scanning electron microscopy. Those passed with subsequent extensive magnetic concentrates from the same samples were finer. The anatase isolated from kaolinite purified by removal of as much of the impurities as possible by magnetic means was extremely fine, most of the particles being on the order of 0·1 µm dia. More than one third of the total Fe2O3 in kaolinites magnetically separated in the first pass was extracted by the citrate-bicarbonate-dithionite treatment after hot NaOH dissolution of 52–74% of the kaolinite, showing that the Fe2O3 had been mainly associated within the kaolinite. Only 2–6% of the total Fe2O3 was extracted from magnetically purified kaolinite after 40–50% of this kaolinite had been dissolved, indicating that most of the Fe is in the anatase and rutile fraction.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1975, The Clay Minerals Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Research Assistant and Franklin Hiram King Professor of Soil Science, respectively.

References

Buslaev, Yu A Dyer, D. S. and Ragsdale, R. O., (1967) Hydrolysis of titanium tetrafluoride lnorg. Chem. 6 22082212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, A. S., (1973) Anatase and rutile determination in soil clays Clay Minerals 10 5758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cotton, F. A. and Wilkinson, G., (1972) Advanced Inorganic Chemistry 3rd Edition New York Interscience.Google Scholar
Dolcater, D. L. Syers, J. K. and Jackson, M. L., (1970) Titanium as free and substituted forms in kaolinites and other soil minerals Clays and Clay Minerals 18 7179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francis, C. W. Tamura, T. Bonner, W. P. and Amburgey, J. W. Jr., (1970) Separation of clay minerals and soil clays using isopycnic zonal centrifugation Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 34 351353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, E. W. and Duke, J. B., (1962) Selective froth flotation of ultrafine minerals or slimes Mining Engr 14 10 5055.Google Scholar
Hashimoto, I. and Jackson, M. L., (1960) Rapid dissolution of allophane and kaolinite-halloysite after dehydration Clays and Clay Minerals 7 102113.Google Scholar
Jackson, M. L., (1958) Soil Chemical Analysis: Prentice-Hall (Sixth printing, 1970) Madison, WI 53706 Published by the author, Department of Soil Science, University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Jackson, M. L., (1969) Soil Chemical Analysis—Advanced Course 2nd Edition Madison, WI 53706 Published by the author, University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Lee, S. Y. Jackson, M. L. and Brown, J. L., (1975) Micaceous occlusions in kaolinite observed by ultramicro-tomy and high resolution electron microscopy Clays and Clay Minerals 23 125129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maynard, R. N. Millman, N. and Ianicelli, J., (1969) A method for removing titanium dioxide impurities from kaolin Clays and Clay Minerals 17 5962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raman, K. V. and Jackson, M. L., (1965) Rutile and anatase determination in soils and sediments Am. Miner. 50 10861092.Google Scholar
Sherman, G. D., (1952) The titanium content of Hawaiian soils and its significance Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 16 1518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, C. E., (1968) Electron probe study of kaolin Clays and Clay Minerals 16 187189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoe, J. H. and Armstrong, A. R., (1947) Colorimetric determination of titanium with disodium-1,2-dihydroxybenzene-3,5-disulfonate Anal. Chem. 19 100102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar