Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-k7p5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-09T02:21:53.761Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Altered Wall Rocks Along vein Deposits in the Central City-Idaho Springs Region, Colorado

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

E. W. Tooker
E. W. Tooker*
Affiliation:
U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Wall-rock alteration along veins in the Central City-Idaho Springs region, Gilpin and Clear Creek Counties, Colorado, superficially resembles alteration around similar base-metal sulfide deposits, but differs in some details. Meso thermal-type veins of early Tertiary age cut deformed Precambrian metasedimentary, igneous, and metamorphosed igneous rocks; the veins contain pyrite, galena, sphalerite, chalcopyrite, and tennantite as principal constituents and minor gold, silver, and uranium minerals. A spatial zonation of ore minerals relates to distinct stages of ore deposition.

Detailed studies show that three of the wall rocks in the area—granodiorite, biotite-mus-covite granite, and biotite-quartz-plagioclase gneiss—are altered to varying degrees and in varying amounts. Clay-mineral formation was a major feature of the process. The alteration sheath around fractures and veins is divided into four gradational but regular zones: (1) Least altered (fresh) rock; (2) weakly altered, hard rock; (3) moderately altered, soft clay-mineral rock—(a) montmorillonite-rich, (b) kaolimte-rich, and (c) illite-sericite-rich; and (4) strongly altered, hard (silicified) rock. The sequence of silicate alteration is believed to relate first to the relative stability of primary mineral structures in the alteration environment, but ultimately to the chemistry of the environment.

The host rocks are significant factors in localization of altered mineral assemblages as they supply the requisite elements for argillic-type alteration. Structures of the host rocks and veins play a prominent role in localization of altered rocks and the zoned ore deposits. Coincidence of alteration and mineralization processes may have more spatial than temporal significance.

A working hypothesis explaining the geological evidence proposes that most alteration was accomplished by meteoric and/or hypogene solutions before ore minerals were deposited. Later solutions of the pyrite stage may have intensified the early zone 4 alteration assemblage close to the source channels, but base-metal sulfide stage solutions were not competent to impress additional alteration effects. Most supergene alteration occurs close to the surface. Therefore, in these areas alteration zonation does not afford a reliable guide to ore.

Type
Article
Information
Clays and Clay Minerals (National Conference on Clays and Clay Minerals) , Volume 4 , February 1955 , pp. 348 - 361
Copyright
Copyright © The Clay Minerals Society 1955

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Publication authorized by the Director, U.S. Geological Survey.

References

Barth, T. F. W., 1955, Presentation of rock analyses: J. Geol., v. 63, p. 348–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bastin, E. S., and Hill, J. M., 1917, Economic geology of Gilpin County and adjacent parts of Clear Creek and Boulder Counties, Colorado: U.S. Geol. Survey Prof. Paper 94, 379 p.Google Scholar
Grim, R. E., and Johns, W. D., 1954, Clay mineral investigation of sediments in the northern Gulf of Mexico: in Clays and clay minerals, Natl. Acad. Sci.-Natl. Res. Council, Pub. 327, p. 81–103.Google Scholar
Harrison, J. E., 1955, Relation between fracture pattern and hypogene zoning in the Freeland-Lamartine district, Colorado: Econ, Geol., v. 50, p. 311–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovering, T. S., 1941, The origin of the tungsten ores of Boulder County, Colorado: Econ. Geol., v. 36, p. 229–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovering, T. S., and Goddard, E. N., 1950, Geology and ore deposits of the Front Range, Colorado: U.S. Geol. Survey Prof. Paper 223, 319 p.Google Scholar
Lovering, T. S., and Tweto, Ogden, 1953, Geology and ore deposits of the Boulder County tungsten district, Colorado: U.S. Geol. Survey Prof. Paper 245, 199 p.Google Scholar
Roy, Rustum, 1954, The application of phase equilibrium data to certain aspects of clay mineralogy: in Clays and clay minerals, Natl. Acad. Sci.—Natl. Res. Council Pub. 327, p. 124–140.Google Scholar
Sales, R. H., and Meyers, C. F., 1948, Wall rock alteration at Butte, Montana: A.I.M.E. Tech. Pub. 2400, 25 p.Google Scholar
Spurr, J. E., Garrey, G. H., and Ball, S. H., 1908, Economic geology of the Georgetown Quadrangle, Colorado: U.S. Geol. Survey Prof. Paper 63, 422 p.Google Scholar
Tooker, E. W., 1955, Investigation of wall-rock alteration, Central City and Idaho Springs districts, Gilpin and Clear Creek Counties, Colorado (abs.): Geol. Soc. America Bull., v. 66, p. 1682.Google Scholar
Wright, H. D., 1954, Mineralogy of a uraninite deposit at Caribou, Colorado: Econ. Geol., v. 49, p. 129–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar