Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T16:41:03.825Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Microstructural observations of clay-hosted pores in black shales: implications for porosity preservation and petrophysical variability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2023

Hongjian Zhu
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Shale Oil and Gas Enrichment Mechanisms and Efficient Development, Beijing, China SINOPEC Key Laboratory of Geology and Resources in Deep Stratum, Beijing, China School of Vehicle and Energy, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao, China
Shuangjian Li
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Shale Oil and Gas Enrichment Mechanisms and Efficient Development, Beijing, China SINOPEC Key Laboratory of Geology and Resources in Deep Stratum, Beijing, China
Zongquan Hu*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Shale Oil and Gas Enrichment Mechanisms and Efficient Development, Beijing, China SINOPEC Key Laboratory of Geology and Resources in Deep Stratum, Beijing, China
Yiwen Ju
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Computational Geodynamics, College of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Yanyan Pan
Affiliation:
School of Vehicle and Energy, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao, China
Manping Yang
Affiliation:
School of Vehicle and Energy, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao, China
Yanjun Lu
Affiliation:
School of Vehicle and Energy, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao, China
Mingbo Wei
Affiliation:
School of Vehicle and Energy, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao, China
Weidong Qian
Affiliation:
Huadong Geosteering & Logging Company, Sinopec Matrix Corporation, Yangzhou, China
*
Corresponding author: Zongquan Hu; Email: huzongquan.syky@sinopec.com

Abstract

Typical unconventional gas/liquid plays of China were studied using field-emission/focused ion beam scanning electron microscopy (SEM) for clay mineralogy and microstructural development. The SEM microstructural investigations of clay-rich shale and mudstone reservoirs provided significant information about clay mineral type, size, distribution and aggregates, which allows for interpretations regarding porosity preservation and petrophysical variability. The major clay-hosted porosity types are interparticle clay pores, intraparticle clay pores and aggregate pores. Interparticle clay pores occur in open spaces of the clay aggregates and include four subtypes: (1) elongated pores, (2) packed pores, (3) jagged pores and (4) card-house pores. Intraparticle clay pores are present within clay particles and have mostly secondary origin. These pores are diagenesis dependent and are restricted to secondary illite particles during the transformation of clay minerals from smectite to illite. Intraparticle clay pores constitute only isolated porosity and could not contribute to hydrocarbon molecule storage and migration. Aggregate pores were predominantly encountered in association with organic–clay and pyrite–clay aggregates. In places, organic–pyrite–clay aggregates can also display polymerization, but they do not contribute significantly to overall porosity and permeability. Combining SEM morphological analyses with the software ImageJ is critical in clay microstructure and porosity analyses via semi-quantitative characterization of the 3D pore surface, 2D pore profile, pore quantity, pore size, areal porosity, etc. These visual and semi-quantitative results highlight the significance of jagged pores and pyrite–clay aggregate pores in shale gas/liquid reservoirs because they may be important facilitators of gas storage and transmission.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Mineralogical Society of the United Kingdom and Ireland

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Editor: George E. Christidis

References

Ahn, J.H. & Peacor, D.R. (1986) Transmission and analytical electron microscopy of the smectite-to-illite transition. Clays and Clay Minerals, 34, 165179.Google Scholar
Bai, Z., Song, K., Fu, H., Shi, Y., Liu, Y. & Chen, Z. (2022) Effect of viscosity and heterogeneity on dispersion in porous media during miscible flooding processes. Advances in Geo-Energy Research, 6, 460471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blattmann, T.M., Liu, Z., Zhang, Y., Zhao, Y., Haghipour, N., Montlucon, D.B. et al. (2019) Mineralogical control on the fate of continentally derived organic matter in the ocean. Science, 366, 742745.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boles, J.R., Franks, S.G. (1979) Clay diagenesis in Wilcox sandstones of southwest Texas; implications of smectite diagenesis on sandstone cementation. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 49, 5570.Google Scholar
Bu, H.L., Ju, Y.W., Tan, J.Q., Wang, G. & Li, X. (2015) Fractal characteristics of pores in non-marine shales from the Huainan coalfield, eastern China. Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering, 24, 166177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cai, J.C., Wei, W., Hu, X.Y. & Wood, D.A. (2017) Electrical conductivity models in saturated porous media: a review. Earth-Science Reviews, 171, 419433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cai, J.C., Lin, D.L., Singh, H., Zhou, S., Meng, Q. & Zhang, Q. (2019) A simple permeability model for shale gas and key insights on relative importance of various transport mechanisms. Fuel, 252, 210219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chalmers, G.R., Bustin, R.M. & Power, I.M. (2012) Characterization of gas shale pore systems by porosimetry, pycnometry, surface area, and field emission scanning electron microscopy/transmission electron microscopy image analyses: examples from the Barnett, Woodford, Haynesville, Marcellus, and Doig unit. AAPG Bulletin, 96, 10991119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamley, H. (1989) Clay Sedimentology. Springer, Berlin, Germany, 623 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, S.B., Han, Y.F., Fu, C.Q., Zhang, H., Zhu, Y. & Zuo, Z. (2016) Micro and nano-size pores of clay minerals in shale reservoirs: implication for the accumulation of shale gas. Sedimentary Geology, 342, 180190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, G.H., Lu, S.F., Liu, K.Y., Han, T., Xu, C., Xue, Q. et al. (2018) GCMC simulations on the adsorption mechanisms of CH4 and CO2 in K-illite and their implications for shale gas exploration and development. Fuel, 224, 521528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, H.E., Johnson, P.D., Matti, J.C. & Zemmels, I. (1975) Methods of sample preparation and X-ray diffraction data analysis. X-ray mineralogy laboratory. Pp. 9991007 in: DSDP Initial Reports (Hayes, D.E. & Frakes, L.A., editors). US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
Curtis, M.E., Sondergeld, C.H., Ambrose, R.J. & Rai, C.S. (2012) Microstructural investigation of gas shales in two and three dimensions using nanometer-scale resolution imaging. AAPG Bulletin, 96, 665677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desbois, G., Urai, J.L., Hemes, S., Brassinnes, S., De Craen, M. & Sillen, X. (2014) Nanometer-scale pore fluid distribution and drying damage in preserved clay cores from Belgian clay formations inferred by BIB-cryo-SEM. Engineering Geology, 179, 117131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Do Campo, M., Bauluz, B., Nieto, F., del Papa, C. & Hongn, F. (2016) SEM and TEM evidence of mixed-layer illite-smectite formed by dissolution–crystallization processes in continental Paleogene sequences in northwestern Argentina. Clay Minerals, 51, 723740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El Halim, M., Daoudi, L., El Ouahabi, M. & Fagel, N. (2023) Characterization of clays from the Fez area (northern Morocco) for potential uses in the ceramics industry. Clay Minerals, 57, 139149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaboreau, S., Robinet, J.C. & Dimitri, P. (2016) Optimization of pore-network characterization of a compacted clay material by TEM and FIB/SEM imaging. Microporous & Mesoporous Materials, 224, 116128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geng, Y.-K., Jin, Z.-K., Zhao, J.-H., Wen, X., Zhang, Z.-P. & Wang, Y. (2017) Clay minerals in shales of the Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation in the eastern Sichuan Basin, China. Clay Minerals, 52, 217233.Google Scholar
Heath, J.E., Dewers, T.A., McPherson, B.J.O.L., Petrusak, R., Chidsey, T.C. Jr, Rinehart, A.J. & Mozley, P.S. (2011) Pore networks in continental and marine mudstones: characteristics and controls on sealing behavior. Geosphere, 7, 429454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemes, S., Desbois, G., Urai, J.L., Schroppel, B. & Schwarz, J.-O. (2015) Multi-scale characterization of porosity in Boom Clay (HADES-level, Mol, Belgium) using a combination of X-ray μ-CT, 2D BIB-SEM and FIB-SEM tomography. Microporous & Mesoporous Materials, 208, 120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houben, M.E., Desbois, G., Urai, J.L. (2013) Pore morphology and distribution in the Shaly facies of Opalinus Clay (Mont Terri, Switzerland): insights from representative 2D BIB–SEM investigations on mm to nm scale. Applied Clay Science, 71, 8297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarvie, D.M., Hill, R.J., Ruble, T.E. & Pollastro, R.M. (2007) Unconventional shale-gas systems: the Mississippian Barnett Shale of north-central Texas as one model for thermogenic shale-gas assessment. AAPG Bulletin, 91, 475499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, C.T. (2010) Probing the nanoscale architecture of clay minerals. Clay Minerals, 45, 245279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ju, Y.W., Huang, C., Sun, Y., Wan, Q., Lu, X., Lu, S. et al. (2017) Nanogeosciences: research history, current status, and development trends. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, 17, 59305965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, L.M., Holzer, L., Wepf, R. & Gasser, P. (2011) 3D geometry and topology of pore pathways in Opalinus Clay: implications for mass transport. Applied Clay Science, 52, 8595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, M.J., Pevear, D.R. & Hill, R.J. (2002) Mineral surface control of organic carbon in black shale. Science, 295, 657660.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kennedy, M.J., Lohr, S.C., Fraser, S.A. & Baruch, E.T. (2014) Direct evidence for organic carbon preservation as clay-organic nanocomposites in a Devonian black shale; from deposition to diagenesis. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 388, 5970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Y., Liu, L., Jin, Y. & Wu, N. (2021) Characterization and development of natural gas hydrate in marine clayey–silt reservoirs: a review and discussion. Advances in Geo-Energy Research, 5, 7586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loucks, R.G., Reed, R.M., Ruppel, S.C. & Jarvie, D.M. (2009) Morphology, genesis, and distribution of nanometer-scale pores in siliceous mudstones of the Mississippian Barnett Shale. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 79, 848861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loucks, R.G., Reed, R.M., Ruppel, S.C. & Hammes, U. (2012) Spectrum of pore types and networks in mudrocks and a descriptive classification for matrix-related mudrock pores. AAPG Bulletin, 96, 10711098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, P.H. (2009) Pore-throat sizes in sandstones, tight sandstones, and shales. AAPG Bulletin, 93, 329340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richard, W.F. & O'Brien, N.R. (1991) The Signatures of Clay Microstructure – Overview. Pp. 34 in: Microstructure of Fine-Grained Sediments: From Mud to Shale (Bennett, R.H., Bryant, W.R., Hulbert, M.H., Chiou, W.A., Faas, R.W., Kasprowicz, J. et al., editors). Springer, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
Ross, D.J.K. & Bustin, R.M. (2009) The importance of shale composition and pore structure upon gas storage potential of shale gas reservoirs. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 26, 916927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schieber, J. (2013) SEM observations on ion-milled samples of Devonian black shales from Indiana and New York: the petrographic context of multiple pore types. AAPG Memoir, 102, 153171.Google Scholar
Slatt, R.M. & O'Brien, N.R. (2011) Pore types in the Barnett and Woodford gas shales: contribution to understanding gas storage and migration pathways in fine-grained rocks. AAPG Bulletin, 95, 20172030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, G.C. (2020) Deformation of organic matter and its effect on pores in mud rocks. AAPG Bulletin, 104, 2136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wanyan, Z., Liu, Y., Li, Z., Zhang, C., Liu, Y. & Xue, T. (2023) Mechanism and influence factor of hydrocarbon gas diffusion in porous media with shale oil. Advances in Geo-Energy Research, 7, 3948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, S., Gou, Q.Y., Hao, F., Zhang, B.Q., Shu, Z.G., Lu, Y. & Wang, Y.X. (2020) Shale pore structure characteristics of the high and low productivity wells, Jiaoshiba shale gas field, Sichuan Basin, China: dominated by lithofacies or preservation condition? Marine and Petroleum Geology, 114, 104211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, J.R., Xu, M.D., Christidis, G.E. & Zhou, C.H. (2020a) Clay minerals in drilling fluids: functions and challenges. Clay Minerals, 55, 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, J.Z., Tang, Y.J., He, D.X., Sun, P. & Zou, X. (2020b) Full-scale nanopore system and fractal characteristics of clay-rich lacustrine shale combining FE-SEM, nano-CT, gas adsorption and mercury intrusion porosimetry. Applied Clay Science, 196, 105758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, H.J., Ju, Y.W., Qi, Y., Huang, C. & Zhang, L. (2018) Impact of tectonism on pore type and pore structure evolution in organic-rich shale: implications for gas storage and migration pathways in naturally deformed rocks. Fuel, 228, 272289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, H.J., Ju, Y.W., Huang, C., Chen, F., Chen, B. & Yu, K. (2020) Microcosmic gas adsorption mechanism on clay–organic nanocomposites in a marine shale. Energy, 197, 117256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, H.J., Ju, Y.W., Lu, W.D., Han, K., Qi, Y., Neupane, B. et al. (2017) The characteristics and evolution of micro-nano scale pores in shales and coals. Journal of Nanoscience & Nanotechnology, 17, 61246138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, H.J., Ju, Y.W., Huang, C., Han, K., Qi, Y., Shi, M. et al. (2019) Pore structure variations across structural deformation of Silurian Longmaxi shale: an example from the Chuandong Thrust-Fold belt. Fuel, 241, 914932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, H.J., Huang, C., Ju, Y.W., Bu, H., Li, X., Yang, M. et al. (2021) Multi-scale multi-dimensional characterization of clay-hosted pore networks of shale using FIBSEM, TEM, and Xray micro-tomography: implications for methane storage and migration deformed rocks. Applied Clay Science, 213, 106239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar