Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T06:28:35.505Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Clay minerals of the Green River Formation (Eocene) of Wyoming

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2018

R. W. Tank*
Affiliation:
Lawrence University, Appleton, Wisconsin, U.S.A.

Abstract

X-ray analyses indicate that illite, smectite, loughlinite (Na20.3Mg0.6SiO2.8H2O) and chlorite are present in the < 2 μm fraction of the lacustrine Green River Formation (Eocene) of Wyoming. Material amorphous to X-rays and random mixed-layer structures are present in subordinate amounts. Individual crystals vary from pure, well-ordered structures to poorly crystallized forms.

Illite is ubiquitous, occurring in all the samples studied. It is generally associated with other clay minerals but frequently occurs as the only clay mineral found in the 'oil shales'. Smectite is present in all three members of the Green River Formation, but its presence frequently shows an inverse relationship to both analcime and loughlinite. Loughlinite is restricted to the saline facies of the Wilkins Peak Member. Chlorite occurs only in the silty and sandy beds of the Tipton Shale Member. The distribution of random mixed-layer structures and amorphous material is irregular. Several independent lines of evidence favour an in situ origin for many of the clay minerals reported in this investigation.

The 'oil shales', which are in most cases varved, kerogenous, dolomitic marls, have a variable clay mineral composition. There is a marked tendency, however, for illite to be the dominant or the only clay mineral present. Apparently the geochemical conditions favouring the accumulation of the oil shales also favoured in situ generation of illite.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bradley, W.H. (1964) Geology of Green River Formation and associated Eocene rocks in southwestern Wyoming and adjacent parts of Colorado and Utah. Prof. Pap. 496-A, U.S. geol. Sum., 86p.Google Scholar
Deardorff, D.L. (1959) Stratigraphy and oil shales of the Green River Formation southwest of the Rock Springs Uplift, Wyoming. Master's Thesis, University of Wyoming.Google Scholar
Droste, J.B. (1961) Bull. geol. Soc. Am. 72, 1713.Google Scholar
Fahey, J.J. & Mrose, M.E. (1962) Saline minerals of the Green River Formation. Prof. Pap. 405, U.S.geol.Surv., 50 p.Google Scholar
Fahey, J.J., Mrose, M.E. & Axelrod, J.M. (1960) Am. Miner. 45, 270.Google Scholar
Goodwin, J.H. & Surdam, R.C. (1967) Science, New York, 157, 307.Google Scholar
Hay, R.L. (1965) Pattern of silicate authigenesis in the Green River Formation of Wyoming. Geol. Soc. Am., Abstracts for 1964 p. 88, Spec. Pap. geol. Soc. Am., 82.Google Scholar
Hay, R.L. (1966) Zeolites and zeolitic reactions in sedimentary rocks, Spec. Pap. geol. Soc. Am. 85, 130 p.Google Scholar
Iuima, A. & Hay, R.L. (1968) Am. Miner. 53, 184.Google Scholar
Johns, W.D., Grim, R.E. & Bradley, W.F. (1954) J. sedim. Petrol. 24, 242.Google Scholar
Millot, G. (1962) Proc. Symp. Basic Sci. France-U.S., New York, 1960, 159.Google Scholar
Milton, C., Chao, E.L.T., Fahey, J.J. & Mrose, M.E. (1960) 21st Int. geol. Congr. (Copenhagen, 1960), Proc. of Sec. 21, 171.Google Scholar
Rateev, M.A., Pokidm, A.K. & Kheirov, M.G. (1963) Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 148, 187.Google Scholar
Slaughter, M. & Milne, I.H. (1959) Clays Clay Miner. 6, 114.Google Scholar
Smith, J.W. (1969) Geochemistry of oil-shale genesis, Green River Formation, Wyoming. Twenty-first annual Field Conf. -1969. Wyo. Geol. Assoc. Guidebook, 185.Google Scholar
Tank, R.W. (1969) J. sedim. Petrol. 39, 1593.Google Scholar
Wollast, R., Mackenzie, F.T. & Bricker, O.P. (1968) Am. Miner. 53, 1645.Google Scholar