Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-01T03:58:15.076Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A study of kinetics and successive sorption/desorption of Zn and Cd uptake onto iron-modified zeolite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Marin Ugrina ,
Nediljka Vukojević Medvidović ,
Jelena Perić  and
Marina Trgo
Marin Ugrina*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Chemistry and Technology, University of Split, Teslina 10/V, 21000 Split, Croatia
Nediljka Vukojević Medvidović
Affiliation:
Faculty of Chemistry and Technology, University of Split, Teslina 10/V, 21000 Split, Croatia
Jelena Perić
Affiliation:
Faculty of Chemistry and Technology, University of Split, Teslina 10/V, 21000 Split, Croatia
Marina Trgo
Affiliation:
Faculty of Chemistry and Technology, University of Split, Teslina 10/V, 21000 Split, Croatia
*
*E-mail: mugrin@ktf-split.hr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The sorption properties of iron-modified zeolite (IMZ) and the kinetics of zinc and cadmium uptake by the IMZ were investigated by the batch method. Two kinetic stages were observed, fast uptake up to 240 min, followed by slow uptake up to equilibrium. Kinetic results were fitted to the reaction and diffusion kinetic models, which indicated that intra-particle diffusion was the rate-limiting step. The Vermeulen’s approximation model was used to predict the quantity of Zn and Cd ions removed per gram of IMZ. The results of the successive sorption and desorption of Zn and Cd ions, with different electrolyte solutions, showed the best desorption efficiency with sodium salt solutions. Four successive repetitions of the sorption/desorption cycles showed a small difference between the amount of sorbed and desorbed Zn and Cd ions from the second to the fourth cycle. This indicates excellent sorption/regeneration properties of the IMZ.

Keywords

iron-modified zeolitezinccadmiumkineticssorptiondesorption
Type
Research Article
Information
Clay Minerals , Volume 50 , Issue 1 , March 2015 , pp. 117 - 132
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Apiratikul, R. & Pavasant, P. (2008) Sorption of Cu2+, Cd2+, and Pb2+ using modified zeolite from coal fly ash. Chemical Engineering Journal, 144, 245–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barakat, M.A. (2011) New trends in removing heavy metals from industrial wastewater. Arabian Journal of Chemistry, 4, 361–377.Google Scholar
Chiron, N., Guilet, R. & Deydier, E. (2003) Adsorption of Cu(II) and Pb(II) onto a grafted silica: isotherms and kinetic models. Water Research, 37, 3079–3086.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dimirkou, A. (2007) Uptake of Zn2+ ions by a fully ironexchanged clinoptilolite. Case study of heavily contaminated drinking water. Water Research, 41, 2763–2773.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doula, M.K. (2006) Removal of Mn2+ ions from drinking water by using Clinoptilolite-Fe oxide system. Water Research, 40, 3167–3176.Google Scholar
Doula, M.K. & Dimirkou, A. (2008) Use of an ironoverexchanged clinoptilolite for the removal of Cu2+ ions from heavily contaminated drinking water samples. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 151, 738–745.Google Scholar
Gedik, K. & Imamoglu, I. (2008) Removal of cadmium from aqueous solutions using clinoptilolite: influence of pretreatment and regeneration. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 155, 385–392.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Han, R., Zou, L., Zhao, X., Xu, Y., Xu, F., Li, Y. & Wang, Y. (2009) Characterisation and properties of iron oxide-coated zeolite as adsorbent for removal of Copper(II) from solution in fixed bed column. Chemical Engineering Journal, 149, 123–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helfferich, F. (1962) Ion Exchange. Pp. 250–322. McGraw-Hill Inc., New York.Google Scholar
Katsou, E., Malamis, S., Haralambous, K.J. & Loizidou, M. (2010) Use of ultrafiltration membranes and aluminosilicate minerals for nickel removal from industrial wastewater. Journal of Membrane Science, 360, 234–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katsou, E., Malamis, S., Tzanoudaki, M., Haralambous, K.J. & Loizidou, M. (2011) Regeneration of natural zeolite polluted by lead and zinc in wastewater treatment systems. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 189, 773–786.Google Scholar
Kennedy Oubagaranadin, J.U., Sathyamurthy, N. & Murthy, Z.V.P. (2007) Evaluation of Fuller’s earth for the adsorption from aqueous solutions: A comparative study with activated carbon. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 142, 165–174.Google Scholar
Kragović, M., Daković, A., Marković, M., Krstić, J., Gata, D.G. & Rotiroti, N. (2013) Characterization of lead sorption by natural and Fe(III)-modified zeolite. Applied Surface Science, 283, 764–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kragović, M., Daković, A., Sekulić, Ž., Trgo, M., Ugrina, M., Perić, J. & Diego Gatta, G. (2012) Removal of lead from aqueous solutions by using the natural and Fe(III)-modified zeolite. Applied Surface Science, 258, 3667–3673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar Vasanth, K. (2006) Linear and non-linear regression analysis for the sorption kinetics of methylene blue onto activated carbon. Journal of Hazardous Materials, B, 137, 1538–1544.Google Scholar
Kumar, D. & Gaur, J.P. (2011) Chemical reaction- and particle diffusion-based kinetic modelling of metal biosorption by a Phormidium sp.-dominated cyanobacterial mat. Bioresource Technology, 102, 633–640.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Minceva, M., Fajgar, R., Markovska, L. & Meshko, V. (2008) Comparative study of Zn2+, Cd2+ and Pb2+ removal from water solution using natural clinoptilolitic zeolite and commercial granulated activated carbon. Equilibrium of adsorption. Separation Science and Technology, 43, 2117–2143.Google Scholar
Mossi, T., Rowson, N.A. & Simmons, M.J.H. (2011) Kinetic studies of the removal of heavy metals from acid mine drainage by natural zeolite. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 101, 42–49.Google Scholar
Nagajyoti, P.C., Lee, K.D. & Sreekanth, T.V.M. (2010) Heavy metals, occurrence and toxicity for plants: a review. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 8, 199–216.Google Scholar
Onyango, M.S., Matsuda, H. & Ogada, T. (2003) Sorption kinetics of arsenic onto iron-conditioned zeolite. Journal of Chemical Engineering of Japan, 4, 477–485.Google Scholar
Pabalan, R.T. & Bertetti, F.P. (2001) Cation-exchange properties of natural zeolite. Pp. 453–518 in: Natural Zeolites: Occurrence, Properties, Applications (D.L. Bish & D.W. Ming, editors). Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA.Google Scholar
Sheha, R.R. & El-Zahhar, A.A. (2008) Synthesis of some ferromagnetic composite resins and their metal removal characteristic in aqueous solutions. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 150, 795–803.Google Scholar
Shoumkova, A. (2011) Zeolites for water and wastewater treatment: an overview. Research Bulletin of the Australian Institute of High Energetic Materials, Special Issue on Global Fresh Water Shortage, 2, 10–70.Google Scholar
Sun, Y., Fang, Q., Dong, J. Cheng, X. & Xu, J. (2011) Removal of fluoride from drinking water by natural stilbite zeolite modified with Fe(III). Desalination, 277, 121–127.Google Scholar
Svilović, S., Rušić, D. & Stipišić, R. (2009) Modelling batch kinetics of copper ion sorption using synthetic zeolite NaX. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 170, 941–947.Google Scholar
Tosun, I. (2012) Ammonium removal from aqueous solutions by clinoptilolite: determination of isotherm and thermodynamic parameters and comparison of kinetics by the Double exponential model and conventional kinetic models. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 9, 970–984.Google Scholar
Tütem, E., Apak, R. & Ünal, Ç.F. (1998) Adsorptive removal of chlorophenols from water by bituminous shale. Water Research, 32, 2315–2324.Google Scholar
Ugrina, M., Vukojević Medvidović, N. & Daković, A. (2015) Characterization and environmental application of iron-modified zeolite from the Zlatokop deposit. Desalination and Water Treatment, 53, 3557–3570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volesky, B. (2001) Detoxification of metal-bearing effluents: biosorption for the next century. Hydrometallurgy, 59, 203–216.Google Scholar
Wang, S. & Peng, Y. (2010) Natural zeolites as effective adsorbents in water and wastewater treatment. Chemical Engineering Journal, 156, 11–24.Google Scholar
Wilczak, A. & Keinath, T.M. (1993) Kinetics of sorption and desorption of copper(II) and lead(II) on activated carbon. Water Environment Research, 65, 238–244.Google Scholar
Zamzova, M.J., Eichbauma, B.R., Sandgrena, K.R. & Shanksa, D.E. (1990) Removal of heavy metals and other cations from wastewater using zeolites. Separation Science and Technology, 25, 1555–1569.Google Scholar