No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
On Three Passages of Ovid
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 October 2009
Abstract
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0009840X00006065/resource/name/firstPage-S0009840X00006065a.jpg)
- Type
- Original Contributions
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Classical Association 1913
References
page 257 note 1 In MSS. the letters p and f, c and t, are frequently confused. ‘“ In faciem” duo Moreti’ Burmann ad loc. The codd. dett. of the Amores are said often to preserve traces of the truth where the better MSS. are at fault.
page 257 note 2 DrMagnus, Hugo, Studien zur Uberliefentng, etc. (Berlin, 1893)Google Scholar. See Heinsius ap. Burmann (1727) ad loc.
page 257 note 3 Cf. (e.g.) the ‘illas’ of M. for ‘Ilias’ of in Plautus, , Miles Gloriosus, 743Google Scholar.
page 257 note 4 See Prof. Ellis' Commentary on XXIX. 5.
page 258 note 1 i. 1. Cui dono lepidum novum libellum, etc.
page 258 note 2 Cf. Mort. i. 61, Verona docti syllabas amat vatis with Stephenson's comment ad loc. on line 12.
page 258 note 3 C.P.L., not. crit., ad loc.