Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-xq9c7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-16T21:53:31.891Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On Three Passages of Ovid

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

D. A. Slater
Affiliation:
Llanishen, Cardiff.

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Original Contributions
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1913

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 257 note 1 In MSS. the letters p and f, c and t, are frequently confused. ‘“ In faciem” duo Moreti’ Burmann ad loc. The codd. dett. of the Amores are said often to preserve traces of the truth where the better MSS. are at fault.

page 257 note 2 DrMagnus, Hugo, Studien zur Uberliefentng, etc. (Berlin, 1893)Google Scholar. See Heinsius ap. Burmann (1727) ad loc.

page 257 note 3 Cf. (e.g.) the ‘illas’ of M. for ‘Ilias’ of in Plautus, , Miles Gloriosus, 743Google Scholar.

page 257 note 4 See Prof. Ellis' Commentary on XXIX. 5.

page 258 note 1 i. 1. Cui dono lepidum novum libellum, etc.

page 258 note 2 Cf. Mort. i. 61, Verona docti syllabas amat vatis with Stephenson's comment ad loc. on line 12.

page 258 note 3 C.P.L., not. crit., ad loc.