^{page 197 note 1} I can find no instance of , though I think it is sufficiently defended by some of the instances of the article with numerals. If we read (with or without ), we may suppose that τὸ, miswritten after παρὸν as well as before it, was wrongly read as the contracted sign for των.

^{page 198 note 1} Though of course such a phrase as would be impossible with the participle as present, since it would then be no longer attributive but adverbial, and therefore must express time in relation to