Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T18:36:49.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Notes on the New Callimachus and Menander. Ep. 357

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

A. D. Knox
A. D. Knox
Affiliation:
King's College, Cambridge.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Original Contributions
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 27 , Issue 4 , June 1913 , pp. 120 - 121
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1913

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 120 note 3 But ἰδεῖν λοξ⋯ν takes an accusative in Solon fr. 34; compare Eratosthen. Schol. A.P. v. 240.

page 121 note 1 See Housman, , Class. Quart. 1910, p. 117Google Scholar.

page 121 note 2 I trust that the editor of L and S will correct the quantities of various compounds of δ⋯ω. See Lobeck, , Parall., p. 418Google Scholar. The ε of εἴρυμα is easy to see in the facsimile (Von Arnim).

page 121 note 3 I have counted in this book alone at least eight other words omitted in L and S; why?