^{page 40 note 1} Questa retains turbare, odd in both sense and idiom. His reference to the meaning of turba in Ter. And. 235 (p. 12, n. 11) betrays some misunderstanding.

^{page 41 note 1} These omissions must be seen in the light of what is said below about the size of the apparatus.

^{page 41 note 2} The Ambrosianus, incidentally, which is of course used only in Studemund's apographon, should no longer be described as ‘saec. IIIReviewsIV’. E. A. Lowe firmly puts it in the fifth century.

^{page 41 note 3} Revised readings e.g. 405 experiar B; 553 obsecro B; 968 eum C. It is no credit to modern texts that even readings of C, conveniently accessible in Zangemeister's fac-simile edition of 1900, remained unchecked until 1965. Detail concerning corrections in B was available since 1900 in Lindskog's paper, LundsUniv. Årsskr. 36, and it bears out the accuracy of Questa's statements, except the perhaps at 681 (Lindskog, p. 25, a very minute point).