Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T01:42:30.835Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Xopoy in The Plutus: A Reply To Mr. Handley

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

W. Beare
Affiliation:
University of Bristol

Extract

In an interesting article entitled ‘XOPOY in the Plutus’ Mr. E. W. Handley questions the accuracy of some observations of mine on this subject, and complains of my ‘failure to state facts’. He quotes my remark that ‘the editors freely insert () in the Plutus; but, according to Weissinger (p. 51), the only example afforded by the MSS. is after 770; and here there is no lapse of time’. I added in a footnote that R inserts XOPOY after line 801, according to the Oxford text. Handley's own researches have shown him that R has KOMMATION XOPOY between 770 and 771, and that R has inserted XOPOY between 801 and 802.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1955

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 49 note 1 C.Q., N.s. iii (1953), 5561Google Scholar

page 49 note 2 In ‘XOPOY in the Heautontimorum and the Plutus’, Hermathena, lxxiv (1949), 2638.Google Scholar

page 49 note 3 In ‘A Study of Act Divisions in Classical Drama’, Iowa Studies in Class. Phil. ix (1940). Weissinger's words are ‘In the Plutus KOMMATION XOPOY occurs once in the MSS. …after vs. 770… But editors have added XOPOY's … Bergk (1900) has a seventh XOPOY after vs. 1170.’Google Scholar

page 50 note 1 I quote from Dindorf's 1822 edition, vol. i, p. 9