¹ By Martin, C. T. for the Rolls Series (1882–1885)Google Scholar. Reviewed by Tout, T. F. in English Historical Review, II (1887), 555–9.Google Scholar

² By C. L. Kingsford (sometime before 1895).

³ London, 1898.

⁴ Notably Jeremy Collier and E. W. Dixon.

⁵ The Grey Friars in Oxford (Oxford, 1892), especially pp. 73–7 and 154–6.Google Scholar

⁶ “Der Augustinismus und der Aristotelismus in der Scholastik gegen Ende des XIII Jahrhunderts,” Archiv für Literatur- und Kirchengeschichte des Mittelalters, V (1889), 603fGoogle Scholar; and “John Peckham über den Kampf des Augustinismus,” Zeitschrift für Katholische Theologie, XIII (1889), 172–93.”Google Scholar

⁷ Franziskcmische Studien, II (1915), 170–207 and 266–85.Google Scholar

⁸ Seiträge zur Geschichte der Philosophie des Mittelalters, XIX (1918), Hft. 5–6.Google Scholar

⁹ Some of the difficulties involved in editing these manuscripts are mentioned, p. xxxv et seqq. (Prolegomena) and seem quite formidable.

¹⁰ Spettmann later added further titles to this bibliography; see Beiträge zur Geschichte der Philosophie des Mittelalters, suppl. Bd. 2 (1923), 241f.Google Scholar

¹¹ Beiträge, etc., XX (1919), Hft. 6.Google Scholar

¹² Discussed also by Sharp (infra), pp. 61, 123, 179, 289f and 372; and also by Vogel (infra), p. 7.

¹³ Op. cit., p. 9, note 2.

¹⁴ Seiträge zur Geschichte der Philosophie des Mittelalters, suppl. Bd. 2 (1923), 221–42.Google Scholar

¹⁵ Not available to the reviewer.

¹⁶ Divus Thomas, (Fribourg), v. (1927), 327–45.Google Scholar

¹⁷ Zeitschrift für Katholische Theologie, LII (1928), 64–74.Google Scholar

¹⁸ Archivum Franciscanum Historicwm, VIII (1915), Hft. 3–4, 398–447Google Scholar. This has been reviewed by P. Hieronymus Spettmann, O. F. M., in Franziskanische Studien, IV (1917), 217f.Google Scholar

¹⁹ Franziskanische Studien, IV (1917), 127–76.Google Scholar

²⁰ Written (Oliger claims) against Gerard of Abbeville.

²¹ Siger de Brabant: part 1. (Lonvain, 1911.)Google Scholar

²² Op. cit., pp. 91–108 and 299.

²³ Ibid., pp. 95–102.

²⁴ Ibid., p. 91.

²⁵ Ibid., pp. 100–8 and 228–85.

²⁶ Registrum Epistolantm Fr. Johannis Peckham, III, 842.Google Scholar

²⁷ Archivum Franciscanum Historicum, XVIII (1925), 441–72Google Scholar; summarized on p. 441 (in Latin) and on pp. 471–2 (in French). Callebaut gives a reference (p. 472, note 1) to Peckham by Cardinal Ehrle in his “L'agostinismo …,” in Xenia thomistica (Korne, 1925)Google Scholar, which the reviewer has not been able to see.

²⁸ Note the criticism of de Wulfs Le Traité ‘De unitate formae’ de Gilles de Lessines (p. 61f) occurring p. 443, note 5.

²⁹ “La Théorie de l'Abstraction dans l'Ecole franciscaine, de Alexandre de Halès à Jean Peekham”, Archives d'histoire doctrinale et litteraire du moyen age, III (1928), 105–84Google Scholar. Peckham is also mentioned on pp. 105 and 175; and there is a good summary on p. 181f.

³⁰ History of Medieval Philosophy (Translation by E. C. Messinger). London: Longmans, Green & Co., 1926Google Scholar. The first (French) edition appeared in 1900.

³¹ Op. cit., II, 261, 283, 335, 337, etc.

³² Ibid., I, 378f.

³³ Ibid., II, 40–2.

³⁴ Ibid., II, 57.

³⁵ Ibid., II, 134.

³⁶ Ibid., II, 142, note 1.

³⁷ Franciscan Philosophy at Oxford in the Thirteenth Century (Oxford: University Press, 1930).Google Scholar

³⁸ Op. cit., pp. 175–207.

³⁹ Ibid., pp. 186–92.

⁴⁰ Cf. also Ibid., p. 193f.

⁴¹ Ibid., p. 176, note 3. See Spettmann, “Der Ethikkommentar des Johannes Pecham” (supra); and Pelzer, A., “Les versions Latines des ouvrages de Morale conservés sous le nom d' Aristote en usage au xiiie siècle,” Rev. Néo Scol., 1921, 316f.Google Scholar

⁴² London: E. Benn, 1930.

⁴³ Op. cit., p. 47 and p. 251.

⁴⁴ Fascicule G. (Paris, 1932).

⁴⁵ Including several studies not available to the present reviewer.

⁴⁶ Teil, Zweiter: Vie Patristische und Scholastische Philosophie, (Berlin, 1928), pp. 479, 484f, 495 and 762.Google Scholar

⁴⁷ E. E. T. S. (O. S.) 118; T. F. Simons and H. E. Nolloth, editors (London, 1901).

⁴⁸ Educational Charters and Documents 598–1909 (Cambridge: University Press, 1911).Google Scholar

⁴⁹ London: Methuen & Co., Ltd., n. d. (1915?)

⁵⁰ England under the Old Seligion (London, 1912), p. 233Google Scholar. See also his Parish Life in Medieval England (2nd. ed., London, 1907), passim.Google Scholar

⁵¹ London: W. B. Clive, 1920.

⁵² The Lollard Bible (Cambridge: University Press, 1920).Google Scholar

⁵³ Ethical Teachings in the Latin Hymns of Medieval England (New York: Colum bia University Press, 1930), p. 26f.Google Scholar

⁵⁴ Peekham, J. L., Archbishop Peckham as a Religious Educator: Yale Studies in Religion Number 7—Historical Monograph. (Seottdale, 1934).Google Scholar

⁵⁵ Cambridge: University Press, 1926.

⁵⁶ English Historical Review, XXVIII (1913), 625–35.Google Scholar

⁵⁷ Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschiehte, XXXIV (1913)Google Scholar, Kanon istische Abteilung III, 344–63, especially p. 358f.

⁵⁸ Associated Architectural Societies Seports and Papers, XXXIII (1915–1916), 35–73.Google Scholar

⁵⁹ C. L. Peltoe and E. H. Minns.

⁶⁰ Transactions of the Society of Cymmroaorion 1900–1 (London, 1902), pp. 53–86.Google Scholar

⁶¹ I. e., making the Court of Canterbury one of First Instance, as well as a Court of Appeal—see Jenkins, C. (infra), pp. 92–6.Google Scholar

⁶² In Essays in Medieval History presented to Thomas Frederick Tout (Manchester, 1925), pp. 171–88.Google Scholar

⁶³ English Ecclesiastical Studies (London; S. P. G. K.; New York & Toronto: Macmillan Co., 1929)Google Scholar. There are also data (pp. 280 and 350) drawn from Peckham's Registrum not noted under his name in the index.

⁶⁴ Cambridge: University Press, 1922. The Archbishop is referred to as “great” (p. 26), “energetic” (p. 347), “the stern (“vigorous,” p. 346) reformer” (p. 60), and “strict disciplinarian” (p. 192. Of. pp. 312 and 358).

⁶⁵ Episcopal Visitation of Monasteries in the Thirteenth Century (Manchester: University Press, 1931).Google Scholar

⁶⁶ Little or no use is made of materials existing only in manuscripts.

⁶⁷ London: S. P. C. K., 1933.

⁶⁸ Op. cit., II, 13, 17, 31, 81f, 123, 131, and 205.

⁶⁹ Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Mediaeval Academy of America, not yet published.

⁷⁰ Fratris Johannis Pecham…. Tractatus tres de pampertate (British Society of Franciscan Studies, II; Aberdeen, 1910.)Google Scholar An excellent review of this work by P. Livarius Oliger appeared in Archivum Franciscanum Historicum, IV (1911), 147–52.Google Scholar

⁷¹ A. G. Little, M. R. James, and H. M. Bannister, editors. (British Society of Franciscan Studies, V; Aberdeen, 1914.)

⁷² Op. cit., p. 10.

⁷³ Ibid., p. 21.

⁷⁴ Ibid., p. 130.

⁷⁵ Manchester: University Press, 1917.

⁷⁶ Op. cit., pp. 39, 53, 57, 68 and 131.

⁷⁷ Ibid., pp. 121 and 173.

⁷⁸ London: S. P. C. K.; and New York: Macmillan, 1920.

⁷⁹ Archivum Franciscanum Historicum, XIX (1926), 803–74.Google Scholar

⁸⁰ Ibid., p. 853. References are given to Denifle et al.

⁸¹ Manchester: University Press, 1924.

⁸² Op. cit., pp. 32, 33, 38 and 76.

⁸³ London: Constable & Co., Ltd. (1926).

⁸⁴ Op. cit., p. 67 (with two references to Peckham's Registrum). Twice later (p. 80—two more references to the Registrum—and p. 85) he is quoted in defense of the Franciscans.

⁸⁵ Franciscan Studies Number 7. (New York, 1928).Google Scholar

⁸⁶ A History of the Medieval Church (London, Second edition, 1928), p. 162Google Scholar. Cf. also Harris, C. R. S., Duns Scotus (Oxford, 1927), I, 83, 116 and 119.Google Scholar

⁸⁷ Deanesley, , op. cit., p. 223.Google Scholar

⁸⁸ London and Toronto: J. M. Dent & Sons, Ltd., and New York: E. P. Dutton & Co., Inc., 1931. Especially p. 188f.

⁸⁹ Paris and Gembloux, 1928.

⁹⁰ Summarized in English in Tractatus tres (supra), pp. 109–10.Google Scholar

⁹¹ See Little, A. G. in Collectanea Franciscana (supra), I, 21.Google Scholar

⁹² In Tom. IV. (Quaracchi, 1905).

⁹³ Volume II: The Friars etc. (Cambridge: University Press, 1927).Google Scholar

⁹⁴ From St. Francis to Dante (London, 1906), p. 294.Google Scholar

⁹⁵ First Series; 2nd. revised edition with three appendices (London: Simpkin, Marshall, Hamilton, Kent & Co., Ltd., 1915); and Second Series (London, 1907).

⁹⁶ Cambridge: University Press, 1925.

⁹⁷ Studies in English Franciscan History (stipro), p. 220.Google Scholar

⁹⁸ Le Système du Monde (Paris, 1913–1917), III, 515–7, 525, 527.Google Scholar

⁹⁹ Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins Co., (1931), II, part 1, 23; part 2, 740, 750, 762, 823, 916, 951, 957, 1028–30.

¹⁰⁰ Ibid. II, 1028–30.

¹⁰¹ Archiv. hist, i filoz, med., IX (1929), 73–80.Google Scholar

¹⁰² Archiv für Geschichte der Medizin, XXII (1929), 352–6.Google Scholar

¹⁰³ A History of Magic and Experimental Science (New York: Macmillan, 1923), II, 629.Google Scholar

¹⁰⁴ Milwaukee: Bruce Publishing Co., (1932).

¹⁰⁵ La France Franciscaine, XI (1928), 211–29.Google Scholar

¹⁰⁶ London: Burns Oates & Washbourne Ltd., 1924. (The translation exhibits considerable skill, reasonable fidelity to the original, and occasional elegance of diction.)

¹⁰⁷ “Quellenkritisches” (supra), p. 170.Google Scholar

¹⁰⁸ Geschichte der Weltliteratur, IV: Die lateinische und griechische Literatur der christlichen Völker (Freiburg i. B., and St. Louis, Mo., 1905), p. 455Google Scholar; note also p. 440, where Peckham is mentioned in company with St. Thomas Aquinas, St. Bonaventura, Jacopone da Todi and others.

¹⁰⁹ “Quellenkritisches” (supra).

¹¹⁰ “Vier Prosen des Johannes Pecham, O. F. M.,” Franziskanische Studien, IV (1917), 355–67.Google Scholar

¹¹¹ A History of Christian-Latin Poetry from the Beginnings to the, close of the Middle Ages (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1927), pp. 425–9.Google Scholar

¹¹² New York: Macmillan & Co., 1931; pp. 314–5.

¹¹³ Leipzig, Zweite Folge, 1907. In Analecta Hymnica Medii Aevi (C. Blume and G. M. Dreves, editors), L, 592–616.Google Scholar

¹¹⁴ “Sir Otho de Grandisson,” Transactions of the Boyal Historical Society. Third Series; III (1909), 138.Google Scholar

¹¹⁵ Aberdeen: University Press, 1915.

¹¹⁶ London: Macmillan & Co., Ltd., 1920. (Vol. III of A History of the English Church, edited by W. E. W. Stephens and William Hunt.) The index data s. v. “Peckham” are defective, as the Primate's name appears also on pp. 35, 38, 132, 218, 223, 238, 240–1, 289, 293, 308, 311, 314–5 and 349.

¹¹⁷ Paris, Fifth edition, 1924 (?). For the pagination of the Sixth edition, c. 1932, add 154 to the page-numbers here given.

¹¹⁸ Church Quarterly Review, XCIX (1924–1925), 69–115Google Scholar. The article deals with the registers of eight prelates.

¹¹⁹ Op. cit., pp. 76–86 and 90–6. Also pp. 98–107, where illustrations of Peekham's turgid and rhetorical style are given in vigorous and amusing fashion.

¹²⁰ “Report on the Muniments of the Dean and Chapter of Canterbury,” p. 261Google Scholar; in Historical Manuscripts Commission, Various Collections, 1901.Google Scholar

¹²¹ Ibid., p. 276 note 3. (Some less significant references to Peekham are listed in the index, ibid., p. 446.)

¹²² E. g., by Etienne Gilson, Father Cuthtert, Hartridge, et al.

¹²³ E. g., Beiträge zur Geschichte der Philosophie des Mittelalters, XIX (1918), Hft. 2, 96Google Scholar; Franziskanische Studien, II (1915), 112Google Scholar; III (1916), 77, 137, 200, 305. 308; IV (1917). 56, 93, 106, etc.

¹²⁴ Pars XIV (1908) and Pars XXII (1910).

¹²⁵ In the preface to his edition of Meditatio Pauperis in Solitudine (Quaracehi, 1929).Google Scholar