Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-gndc8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T05:12:49.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Presbyterian Attitudes Toward Slavery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

Irving Stoddard Kull
Affiliation:
Rutgers University, New Brunswick, N. J.

Extract

Although for two and a half centuries of our American history slavery was a legal institution and for much of that time a significant factor in our life and although throughout that long period there were opponents to it, moral and religious opposition was not strong until a late date. Much of the opposition in the colonial period was from an economic point of view: the returns would not justify the institution; the initial cost of the slaves was great; their labor was unwillingly given; the system promoted the idleness of the rich and robbed the poor of opportunity and prevented the immigration of industrious laborers. Benjamin Franklin thought that slavery retarded population and industry, and Dr. Benjamin Rush observed that small farms with free labor returned greater profits than slave economy. Here there was no question as to whether slavery was morally right or wrong, only “did it pay?” There was also, in this early period, opposition to slavery from a political point of view in that security was endangered. But in all the thirteen colonies slavery existed and everywhere respectable people owned slaves and clergymen of the major churches, if they had the price, owned them as well dressed clergymen today own automobiles. Here and there a lone voice was raised in opposition on moral or religious grounds, but only the Quakers, as a religious group, made slave-keeping a bar to fellowship. John Woolman, their anti-slavery apostle, made it his life work to go about the country and argue against slavery, because it was contrary to Christianity and because “liberty was the right of all men equally.”

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Church History 1938

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Locke, Mary Stoughton, Anti-Slavery in America from the Introduction of African Slaves to the Prohibition of the Slave Trade (1619–1808) (Boston, 1901), 9Google Scholar and note, 20, 23, 58.

2 John Woolman, Journal, various editions, passim.

3 Locke, op. cit., 49.

4 Jameson, J. F., The American Revolution Considered as a Social Movement (Princeton, 1926), 33.Google Scholar

5 Records of the Presbyterian Church in the United States of America Embracing the Minutes of the General Presbytery and General Synod 1706–1788 Together with an Index and the Minutes of the General Convention for Religious Liberty 1766–1775 (Philadelphia, 1904), 456, 458–9.Google Scholar

6 Ibid., 539.

7 Ibid., 540.

8 Minutes of the Presbyterian Church in the United States of America from Its Organization A. D. 1789 to 1820 Inclusive (Philadelphia, 1847), 688694.Google Scholar

9 Parrington, Vernon Louis, The Romantic Revolution in America 1800–1860 (New York, 1927), 62Google Scholar; Phillips, U. B., American Negro Slavery (New York, 1918), 211212.Google Scholar

10 Van Metre, T. W., Economic History of the United States (New York, 1921), 365.Google Scholar

11 Faulkner, Harold Underwood, American Economic History (New York and London, 1924), 381.Google Scholar

12 Cf. Kettell, T. P., Southern Wealth and Northern Profits… (New York, 1860).Google Scholar

13 Barnes, Gilbert Hobbs, The Antislavery Impulse 1830–1844 (New York, London, c. 1933).Google Scholar

14 Cheeseman, Lewis, Differences Between Old and New School Presbyterians (Rochester, 1848)Google Scholar; Croeker, Zebulon, The Catastrophe of the Presbyterian Church in 1837 (New Haven, 1837)Google Scholar; Wood, James, Old and New Theology: or, The Doctrinal Differences which have Agitated and Divided the Presbyterian Church (New and enlarged edition, Philadelphia, 1855).Google Scholar

15 “Immediate emancipation” was defined in the debate at Lane Seminary in 1834 as “gradual emancipation, immediately begun.” Barnes, op. cit., 66.

16 Ibid., 94.

17 Ibid., 94.

18 Minutes, General Assembly, 1836, 273.

19 Barnes, op. cit., 95.

20 The question of slavery in the Assembly of 1837 was laid on the table by a vote of 93 to 28. Minutes, 1837, 479.

21 Princeton Review, 07, 1837 (vol. 9, no. 3), 479, 480.Google Scholar

22 Cf.Sweet, William Warren, Religion on the American Frontier, Vol. II, The Presbyterians 1783–1840, a Collection of Source Materials (New York and London, 1936), 119.Google Scholar

23 New York Observer (07 15, 1937), 110.Google Scholar

24 This was the Harmony Presbytery. Crocker, op. cit., 64.

25 Baird, Samuel J., Assembly's Digest, A Collection of the Acts, Deliverances, and Testimonies of the Supreme Judicatory of the Presbyterian Church from its Origin in America to the Present Time (Philadelphia, 1855), 823.Google Scholar

26 Baird, op. cit., 822–824.

27 Hodge, A. A., Life of Charles Hodge (New York, c. 1880), 333.Google Scholar

28 Jenkins, William Sumner, Pro-Slavery Thought in the Old South (Chapel Hill, N. C., 1935), 207, 208.Google Scholar

29 Ibid., 208.

30 Hodge, Charles, A Commentary on the Epistle to the Ephesians (New York, 1856)Google Scholar; Princeton Review (Philadelphia, 18371865Google Scholar, begun in 1825 as the Biblical Repertory and, after various changes in name, became in 1837 the Bibtical Repertory and Princeton Review, edited byDr. Hodge and containing a number of articles by him on slavery; Elliott, E. N., Cotton is King: and Pro-Slavery Argument (Augusta, Georgia, 1860)Google Scholar for “The Bible Argument on Slavery” by Dr. Hodge, 841–877; A. A. Hodge, op. cit.

31 Quoted in the New York Observer (07 15, 1837), 110.Google Scholar

32 Crocker, op. cit., 65, 66; Sweet, op. cit., 118.

33 Statisties of 1839 give 19 synods in the New School with 79 presbyteries and 1314 churches. The Southern synods were Missouri with 2 presbyteries and 39 churches, Mississippi with 2 presbyteries and 20 churches, Virginia with 3 presbyteries and 14 churches, Tennessee with 3 presbyteries and 46 churches, and South Carolina-Georgia with 1 presbytery and 8 churches. Minutes of the General Assembly (New School), (1839), 62 ff.Google Scholar

34 See Minutes of the Assembly for 1839, 1840, and 1843.

35 Minutes of the Assembly for 1846, quoted in Barnes, Albert, The Church and Slavery (Philadelphia, 1857), 7678.Google Scholar

36 Albert Barnes, op. cit., 80.

37 Ibid., 85.

38 Ibid., 91–93.

39 Ibid., 97, 98.

40 Minutes, (New School), 1857, 401406.Google Scholar

41 Morris, Edward D., The Presbyterian Church, New School 1837–1869 (Columbus, Ohio, 1905), 142.Google Scholar In 1858 figures showed that 6 synods with 21 presbyteries comprising 285 churches with 16,137 members had withdrawn from the New School.

42 In 1856 in a total of 1,677 New School churches, 301 were in slave states.