Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T06:49:17.950Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Humanists, Puritans and the Spiritualized Household

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

Margo Todd
Margo Todd
Affiliation:
Ms. Todd is lecturer in European history, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The stress of Elizabethan and early Stuart Puritans on the significance of the family as the fundamental spiritual unit of society has led historians to the apparent but perhaps simplistic conclusion that the origins of this doctrine are to be found in Protestant theology. The concomitants of the doctrine—an exaltation of the marriage relationship, a demand for household religious education and discipline and a slight but noteworthy elevation of the position of women within the household—are therefore attributed to Protestantism and particularly to Protestantism of “the hotter sort.” We are told, for example, that “the Reformation, by reducing the authority of the priest in society, simultaneously elevated the authority of lay heads of households” and that the stress on household religious instruction and discipline “was part of the protestant inheritance.”

Type
Research Article
Information
Church History , Volume 49 , Issue 1 , March 1980 , pp. 18 - 34
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Church History 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Hill, Christopher, Society and Puritanism (New York, 1964), pp. 445–446.Google Scholar

2. Keith Thomas, “Women and the Civil War Sects,” Past and Present 13 (April 1958), p. 42. Schücking, Levin L. has also asserted that marriage was seen as a “necessary evil” before the Reformation in The Puritan Family, trans. Battershaw, Brian (New York, 1970), p. 21.Google Scholar

3. Powell, Chilton, English Domestic Relations, 1487–1653 (New York, 1917), p. 147;Google ScholarWright, Louis B., Middle-Class Culture in Elizabethan England (Ithaca, N.Y., 1935), p. 203.Google ScholarSchücking, , Puritan Family, p. 40;Google ScholarWalzer, Michael, The Revolution of the Saints (New York, 1972), p. 188.Google Scholar Walzer here opposes Hill's emphasis on Puritan patriarchy.

4. Hill, , Society and Puritanism, chap. 13.Google Scholar

5. Kearney, Hugh, Scholars and Gentlemen (London, 1970), p. 39;Google ScholarSimon, Joan, Education and Society in Tudor England (Cambridge, 1966), chap. 10.Google Scholar Even seventeenth-century tutors required their students to read Erasmus, Juan Luis Vives and Thomas More (for example, Emmanuel College Ms. 1.2.27; Trinity, Cambridge Mss. R.16.7–10, 14, 15, 17, 18; Cambridge University Ms. Additional 6160). University preachers and lecturers cited Christian humanists (for example, Bodleian, Ms. Rawlinson D.273, [Christ Church, Oxford, 1580], p. 266;Google ScholarBodleian, Ms. Sancroft 25 [Emmanuel, 1629], pp; 121–124)Google Scholar. Of 102 extant book inventories of members of Oxford colleges between 1561 and 1659, 70 include at least one work of Erasmus (Oxford University Archives: Inventories in Chancellour's Court Registers). See also Watson, Andrew G., The Library of Sir Simonds D'Ewes (London, 1966), p. 19.Google Scholar

6. Batty, Bartholomew, The Christian mans Closet, trans. Lowth, William (London, 1581);Google Scholar for example, Batty quoted Aristotle's Oeconomica, Plato's Laws and Cicero's De Officiis in arguing that fathers should instruct their children for the good of the common wealth, and Seneca, Plutarch, Pliny, Epictetus, Xenophon and other ancients are quoted throughout the treatise on all aspects of child rearing. Gouge, William, Of Domesticall Duties (London, 1622)Google Scholar cites Erasmus, as does Bullinger, Heinrich, The Christen state of Matrimonye, trans. Coverdale, Miles (London, 1541),Google Scholar fol. 89v. Bullinger also quoted from the ancients. See citations in Vives, Juan Luis, Instruction of a Christian Woman, trans. Hyrde, Richard (1540);Google Scholar in Watson, Foster, Vives and the Renascence Education of Women (New York, 1912), pp. 29–136Google Scholar (hereafter cited as Watson, Vives); or the humanist Lupset, Thomas's Exhortation to Yonge Men (London, 1544)Google Scholar which attributes to Aristotle (Policraticus, VII and VIII) the last word on child rearing (sig. Cii). The use of classical authors by Puritans and humanists is precisely parallel.

7. Noted by Siegel, Paul in “Milton and the Humanist Attitude toward Women,” Journal of the History of Ideas 11 (1950):45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

8. Erasmus, A ryght frutefull Epystle …; in laude and prayse of matrymony, trans. Richard Taverner (n.d.), sig. Aiiii–Av, Bi–Bvi. Erasmus dedicated this work to Cromwell. In An Exhortation to the diligent studye of scripture (1529), Erasmus suggested that Paul was a widower (sig. Diii Dv).

9. Erasmus, Prayse of matrymony, sigs. Aiiii, Cv. He went on to say, “Thys that in your body eyther dryeth up, or with y great daunger of your helth putryfyeth and corrupteth, whyche in your slepe falleth away, had been a man if ye were a man your selfe.”

10. Vives, Instruction of a Christian Woman in Watson, , Vives, pp. 116–119.Google Scholar Hyrde's translation of this work ran into eight editions by 1592.

11. Batty, Christian mans Closet, fol. 4v.

12. Johnson, James T., “Ends of Marriage,” Church History 38 (12 1969):429–436;CrossRefGoogle ScholarWilliam, and Haller, Malleville, “The Puritan Art of Love” Huntingdon Library Quarterly 5:2 (1942), pp. 265–266, 270.Google Scholar

13. Sermons and Homilies Appointed to be Read in the Churches in the Time of Queen Elizabeth (London, 1840), p. 506.Google Scholar

14. Vives, Juan Luis, The office and duties of an husband, trans. Paynell, Thomas (London, 1550)Google Scholar in Watson, Vives, p. 209; Erasmus, Prayse of matrymony, sigs. Cvi–Cvii; Thomas More, Utopia, Book 2, chap. 12. Compare Erasmus, The Censure dj iudgement … Whyther dyvorsement betwene man and wyfe stondeth with the lawe of God, trans. Nycolas Less (1550?), sigs. D–Dii.

15. Elyot, Sir Thomas, The Defence of Good Women (London, ca. 1531–1538) in Watson Vives, p. 225.Google Scholar

16. Cleaver, Robert, A Godly Form of housholde government (London, 1598), p. 151.Google Scholar

17. Batty, Christian mans Closet, fol. 3v; see also Cleaver, , householde government, p. 1; Daniel Rogers, Matrimoniall Honour (London, 1642), p. 7;Google Scholar compare Baxter, Richard, Christian Directory (London, 1637), p. 514.Google Scholar

18. Gouge, Dedicatory Epistle. Gouge, also used Aristotle's beehive analogy for the family (Domesticall Duties, pp. 16–17);Google ScholarPerkins, William, Workes, 3 vols. (Cambridge, 1618), 3:669, 698.Google Scholar This position, in obvious contradiction to Walzer's thesis of a Puritan contractual family, is more characteristic of Puritan thought than Walzer would care to admit. Compare Gouge, , Domesticall Duties, p. 5.Google Scholar

19. Compare Hill, (Society and Puritanism, pp. 458–459)Google Scholar and Walzer, (Revolution of the Saints, pp. 183–187),Google Scholar who think that the of the family as the source and principal constituent of the commonwealth derives from Jean Bodin.

20. Erasmus, , The Colloquies, trans. Thompson, Craig R. (Chicago, 1965), pp. 95–97, 106;Google Scholar Vives, duties of an husband in Watson, Vives, pp. 202–203; SirElyot, Thomas, The Boke Named the Governour (London, 1531), fols. 15v–16.Google Scholar

21. Tiley, Edmund, A brief … discourse of duties in Mariage, called the Flower of Friendshippe (London, 1568),Google Scholar sig. Aviii.

22. Batty, Christian mans Closet, fol. 4v; Andrewes, Bartimeus, A very short and pithie Catechisme (London, 1586), Dedicatory Epistle (to the authorö congregation at Yarmouth);Google ScholarGouge, compare, Domesticall Duties, p. 18.Google ScholarTaylor, Jeremy, Works, ed. Heber, R., 15 vols. (London, 1828), 5:252–253.Google Scholar

23. Hill, , Society and Puritanism, pp. 466, 457.Google Scholar

24. Bullinger, Christen state of Matrimonye, fols. 81v–82v; Becon, Thomas, Catechism (Parker Society, 1844), pp. 348, 519;Google ScholarCleaver, , housholde government, pp. 35, 38–40;Google ScholarPerkins, , Workes, pp. 670, 698;Google Scholar compare Leigh, Dorothy, The Mothers Blessing (London, 1621), p. 62;Google ScholarMinutes of the Manchester Presbyterian Classis, ed. Shaw, W. A. (Chetham Society, 1890), pp. 117, n. 1; 400.Google Scholar

25. Quoted in Meads', D. M. introduction to The Diary of Lady Margaret Hoby (London, 1930), p. 13Google Scholar (hereafter cited as Hoby, Diary). That his goal was amply realized is evident from the godly households ruled in turn by his most prominent daughters, Mildred Cecil, Lady Burghley, and Lady Anne Bacon. See Hogrefe, Pearl, Women of Action in Tudor England (Ames, Iowa, 1977), pp. 3–56.Google Scholar

26. SirD'Ewes, Simonds, Autobiography and Correspondence, ed. Halliwell, J. O., 2 vols. London, 1845), 1:104, 117.Google ScholarMacfarlane, Alan, The Family Life of Ralph Josselin (Cambridge, 1970), pp. 109, 122, 124.Google ScholarBaxter, , Autobiography (London, 1925), pp. 4–5.Google ScholarThe Reformed Pastor (1656), chap. 2, section 1:4; The Catechizing of Families (London, 1683)Google Scholar.

27. Gouge, , Domesticall Duties, Dedicatory Epistle, pp. 253–266, 497–505, 518–583, 646–693.Google ScholarCleaver, , housholde government, pp. 40–41;Google Scholar Batty, Christian mans Closet, fols. 54–56v.

28. Cleaver, , housholde government, Dedicatory Epistle, p. 13;Google ScholarHoby, , Diary, pp. 38, 62–67, 73–76, 80–88, 91–95, 104–111, 120, 125–126, 130–140, 168–170, 173–184, 190–191, 202, 210–211, 238,Google Scholar n. 122; compare Cross, Claire, The Puritan Earl (London, 1966), pp. 24–27,57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

29. Hogrefe, , Women of Action, pp. 7, 35, 46–49.Google Scholar

30. D'Ewes, , Autobiography, 1:104, 112–113, 117;Google Scholar British Library Ms. Harleian 227, fol. 14v; Macfarlane, , Ralph Josselin, pp. 109, 122.Google Scholar

31. White, H. C., English Devotional Literature, 1600–1640 (Madison, 1931), pp. 60, 63;Google ScholarDonne, John, A Sermon of Commemoration of the Lady Danvers (London, 1627), p. 133;Google ScholarCosin, John, Works, 4 vols. (Oxford, 1863), 1:27;Google ScholarWilliams, A. M., Conversations at Little Gidding (Cambridge, 1970),CrossRefGoogle Scholar introduction.

32. Book of Homilies, p. 507; see also the official catechism of Nowell, Alexander, A Catechisme, trans. Norton, Thomas (London, 1570), fols 9v-10, 73;Google Scholar Cosin, Works, 1:184.

33. Erasmus, A playne and godly exposytion or declaratõ of the comune Crede and of the x. comaundementes (1533), fol. 162v; compare Prayse of Matrymony, sig. Diii, and Sermon…in the seconde chapytre of the Gospell of saynt Johan (n.d.), fols. 12–13v; Whitforde, Richard, The werke for housholder (London, 1537),Google Scholar sigs. Biii, Eii.

34. Vives, , duties of an husband in Watson, Vives, pp. 202–203, 209.Google ScholarInstruction of a Christian Woman in Watson, Vives, p. 128;Google Scholar Hyrde in Watson, Vives, p. 50; Elyot, , Defence, p. 233;Google Scholar Tilney, Flower of Friendshippe, sigs. Ciii, Cv, Cviii.

35. McConica, J. K., English Humanists and Reformation Politics (Oxford, 1965),Google Scholar chap. 7; Harpsfield, Nicholas, The life and death of Sir Thomas Moore … written to the tyme of Queene Marie, ed. Hitchcock, E. V. (London, 1932), pp. 19,75,79;Google Scholar compare pp. 83, 92, and More's letter to Margaret in Watson, Vives, p. 185.

36. Erasmus, Studye of scripture (n.p.); A Sermon of the chyldeJesns (n.d.), title page, sig. Bviii; compare Whitforde, werke for housholders, sigs. Biiii–Bv; Elyot, Governour citing Quintilian, Plutarch and Erasmus.

37. Schnucker, R. V., “The English Puritans and Pregnancy, Delivery, and Breast Feeding,” History of Childhood Quarterly 1:4 (1974);Google ScholarPubMed compare Vives, Playne and godly exposytion, fols. 163v–164: Hyrde in Watson Vives. p. 172.

38. Batty, Christian mans Closet, fols. 10–13v; Perkins, , Workes, p. 694;Google Scholar Leigh, pp. 46–47; cf. Erasmus, Colloquies, preface.

39. Perkins, , Workes, p. 693;Google Scholar Batty, Christian mans Closet, fol. 54 (compare Vives, Instruction of a Christian Woman in Watson, , Vives, p. 125)Google Scholar; Gouge, , Domesticall Duties, pp. 513, 515;Google ScholarClinton, Elizabeth, Countess of Lincolns Nurserie (London, 1622)Google Scholar. An apparently Puritan student at mid-seventeenth century Pembroke College, Cambridge, devoted several pages of his theological notebook to this subject, citing the authority of Plutarch in favor of maternal nursing (Pembroke Ms. LC II. 12, pp. 42–45). The preachers' exhortations were heeded by such Puritan wives as Mrs. Josselin, who nursed all of her children (Macfarlane, , Ralph Josselin, p. 83)Google Scholar and D'Ewes' mother (D'Ewes, , Autobiography, 1:24, 26).Google Scholar

40. Hill, , Society and Puritanism, pp. 458–462.Google Scholar

41. Becon, , Catechism, pp. 353–355;Google ScholarBaxter, , Christian Directory, p. 543;Google ScholarDod, John and Cleaver, Robert, A Godly Forme of Housholde Government (London, 1598), p. 279;Google ScholarCleaver, , housholde government, p. 43;Google Scholar Batty, Christian mans Closet, fol. 22.

42. Batty, Christian mans Closet, fols. 15, 57v, 65v; Perkins, , Workes, p. 699.Google Scholar Both cited Augustine: “Quilibet paterfamilias, quia superintendit domui, episcopus dice potest” (fol. 15 in Batty). Lady Brilliana Harley drew a more extreme analogy in her commonplace book (1622): “Peres et meres sont les Images des dieu. Nous sont diue domestique…” (Nottingham University Ms., Box 166).

43. Schücking, , Puritan Family, p. 6;Google Scholar compare St. John's College, Cambridge, Ms. S 34 (1620); Whitforde, werke for housholders, sigs. Eiii-Eiiii.

44. Elyot, Governour, fol. 32; Vives, Instruction of a Christian Women in Watson, , Vives, pp. 126–127, 129–132;Google Scholar Whitforde, werke for housholders, sig. Dvi; cf. Batty, Christian mans Closet, fols. 7–8, 24–27; Cleaver, , housholde government, pp.43, 46–47;Google ScholarPerkins, , Workes, p. 694.Google Scholar Given recent literature on the supposed absence of affection in the early modern family, it is noteworthy that both humanists and Puritans found it necessary to caution parents against the opposite extreme: Batty, Christian mans Closet, fol. 55; Perkins, , Workes, p. 694;Google ScholarD'Ewes, , Autobiography 1:63–64;Google Scholar compare Stone, Lawrence, The Family, Sex and Marriage in England (New York, 1977),Google Scholar chaps. 3, 5.

45. Whitforde, werke for housholders, sig. Dvi; Harpsfleld, , Thomas Moore, p. 93.Google Scholar

46. Gouge, , Domesticall Duties, p. 5;Google ScholarPerkins, , Workes, p. 700;Google Scholar compare Cleaver, , housholde government, pp. 4, 9, 85–87, 243–345, 370–385;Google Scholar Batty, Christian mans Closet, fol. 3v. Mrs. Josselin certainly functioned as a joint governor: Macfarlane, , Ralph Josselin, p. 96.Google Scholar

47. Hill, , Society and Puritanism, pp. 450, 457.Google Scholar

48. Gouge, , Domesticall Duties, p. 35.Google Scholar

49. Batty, Christian mans Closet, fol. 3v; Cleaver, , housholde government, p. 157.Google Scholar

50. Cleaver, , housholde government, p. 201;Google ScholarPerkins, , Workes, p. 691;Google ScholarGriffith, Matthew, Bethel (London, 1633), p. 289;Google ScholarRogers, Daniel, Matrimoniall Honour (London, 1642), pp. 60–71;Google Scholar compare the very different conclusion of the Donne, Anglican in Sermons, ed. Potter, G. R. and Simpson, E. M., 10 vols. (Berkeley, 1955), 2:346, 336.Google Scholar

51. For example, Powell, , English Domestic Relations, pp. 147–173;Google ScholarHaller, and Haller, , “Art of Love,” p. 249;Google ScholarBecon, , Catechism, pp. 376–377;Google Scholar Batty, Christian mans Closet, fol. 75v.

52. Bale, John, Examinations of Anne Askewe (1547) in Select Works (Parker Society, 1849), pp. 155–156, 198–199.Google Scholar

53. Hailer, and Hailer, , “Art of Love,” p. 252.Google Scholar A note of caution should be introduced here. It must not be concluded that the Puritan marriage relationship was in actuality egalitarian. Obedience to husbands was strongly enjoined under most circumstances. The authority of the woman in the household was still in theory a slight degree less than that of her husband, although Gouge, (Domesticall Duties, p. 273)Google Scholar pointed Out “the smallness of the disparity.” Compare Cleaver, , housholde government, p. 9.Google Scholar

54. Gouge, , Domesticall Duties, p. 18.Google Scholar

55. Erasmus, Studye of scripture, sig. Fii; Hyrde, in Watson, Vives, p. 30; Vives, duties of an husband in Watson, , Vives, pp. 198, 201;Google Scholar compare Cleaver, , housholde government, p. 157.Google Scholar Similar sentiments were expressed by Elyot and More: Watson, , Vives, pp. 228, 179.Google Scholar

56. Powell, , English Domestic Relations, p. 121.Google Scholar

57. Perkins, , Workes, pp. 669, 689.Google Scholar

58. Dod, John, Bathshebaes Instructions to her Sonne Lemuel (London, 1614), pp. 61–62;Google Scholar compare pp. 1–3, 64.

59. Perkins, , Workes, p. 689.Google ScholarHall, Joseph concurred in The Honor of the Married Clergie Mayntayned (London, 1620)Google Scholar, Dedicatory Epistle.

60. Bossy, John, “The Counter-Reformation and the People of Catholic Europe,” Past and Present 47 (05 1970), p. 55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

61. Ibid, pp. 68–70 and passiln.

62. Canons and Decrees of the Council of Trent, ed. and trans. H. J. Schroeder (St. Louis, 1941), pp. 26, 196Google Scholar (hereafter cited as Canons and Decrees); Bossy, John, “The Character of Elizabethan Catholicism” in Aston, Trevor, ed., Crisis in Europe, 1560–1660 (London, 1965), pp. 229–235,Google Scholar and The English Catholic Community 1570–1850 (Oxford, 1976),Google Scholar chaps. 1–3; Smith, Richard, The Life of the Most Honourable and Vertuous Lady, the La. Magdalen Viscountesse Montague, trans. Fursdon, J. C. (London, 1627);Google ScholarParsons, Robert, Booke of the Christian Exercise, appertayning to resolution (London, 1582).Google Scholar

63. Canons and Decrees, p. 182.

64. Parsons, Christian Exercise, fols. 13, 9. Bunny was chaplain to the Archbishop of York and later minister at Bolton.

65. Smith, , Lady Magdalen, p. 31.Google Scholar

66. Laud, William, Works, 7 vols. (Oxford, 1853), 5:446;Google Scholar Wren's position is noted by Hill, , Society and Puritanism, p. 468.Google Scholar

67. Cosin, , Sermon preached… at the Marriage of Mr. Abraham de Laune and Mrs. Mary Wheeler (1624)Google Scholar in Cosin, , Works, 1:48;Google ScholarDonne, , Sermons, 3:244.Google Scholar