Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-k7p5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T21:00:20.683Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Problem of Judgement in Adoption Social Work

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 February 2024

Diana Close
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This paper tries to demonstrate how the existing practice in adoption social work, when applied to applicants and prospective parents, is inadequate, unjust and diametrically opposed to the acknowledged professional ethics and values. As dissatisfaction alone is unproductive, an alternative is proposed to the existing practice based on a Social Change Model of generic social work.

Type
Research Article
Information
Children Australia , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , June 1977 , pp. 30 - 37
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References:

Adoption of Children Act (Victoria), 1964.Google Scholar
Anglim, E., The Adopted Child's Heritage — Two Natural Parents, in Child Welfare, June 1965, pp.339–343.Google Scholar
Baker, R., The Interpersonal Process, Bundoora, PIT Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Baker, R., The Multi-Role Practitioner, in Generic Orientation to Social Work Practice, mimeograph, 1976.Google Scholar
Baker, R. and Campbell, M.D., A Model for the Planning and Promotion of Change in Generic Social Work, Monograph, 1976.Google Scholar
Bissett-Johnson, A., Unpublished notes on adoption presented to social work students, Leicester Univ., U.K., 1973.Google Scholar
Boss, P., Welfare Services for Children: An Overview of Recent Developments, Conference Paper, Melbourne, 1975.Google Scholar
Bowlby, J., Child Care and the Growth of Love, Harmondsworth, Pelican, 1953.Google Scholar
Carroll, V., Adoption in Eastern Oceania, Honolulu, Univ. of Hawaii Press, 1970, in Gilling, M., Assessment and Placement.Google Scholar
In (Picton, C. (Ed.). 1976), 129.Google Scholar
Davoren, J., Decisions About Adoption8 Uses and Abuses of the System. In (Picton, C. (Ed.). 1976), 120-123.Google Scholar
Eck Menning, B., The Infertile Couple: A Plea for Advocacy, Child Welfare, vol. LIV, no. 6, June, 1975, 454–460.Google Scholar
Gilling, M., Assessment and Placement. In (Picton, C.(Ed.). 1976) 124–130.Google Scholar
Goffman, E., Stigma, Harmondsworth, Pelican, 1963.Google Scholar
Goldstein, J., Freud, A., Solnit, A. J., Beyond the Best Interests of the Child, New York, Free Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Hambly, D., Balancing the Interests of the Child, Parents and Adopters: A Review of Australian Adoption Law. In (Picton, C.(Ed.) 1976), 75–100.Google Scholar
Haring, B., Adoptive Trends 1971-1974, Child Welfare, vol. LIV, no.7, July, 1975, 524–525.Google Scholar
Humphrey, M., The Hostage Seekers, London, Longmans, Green and Co., 1969, in Kraus. J., Expectancy of Fertility After Adoption, Australian Social Work, vol. 29, no.2, 19–24.Google Scholar
Jacka, A.A., 1973, Adoption in Brief, National Children's Bureau, U.K., in Gilling, M. In (Picton, C. (Ed.) 1976), 124–130.Google Scholar
Kaduschin, A., A Follow-up Study of Children Adopted When Older: Criteria of Success, American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, April, 1967, vol.37, no.3, 530–539.Google Scholar
Kadushin, A., Single Parent Adoptions: An Overview and Some Relevant Research, Social Service Review, Sept. 1970, 263–274.Google Scholar
Kirk, H.D., Shared Fate, Glencoe, Free Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Kirk, H.D., in Middelstadt, et al., 1970, Adoption Counselling — A New Approach For Growth, Child Adoption, vol.62, no.4,17, in Gilling, M., In (Picton, C.(Ed.). 1976), 124–130.Google Scholar
Kraus, J., Expectancy of Fertility After Adoption, Australian Social Work, vol. 29, no.2, June 1976, 19–22.Google Scholar
Kraus, J., Historical Context of the Adoption ‘Crisis’ in New South Wales, Australian Social Work, vol. 29, no.4, December, 1976, 19–25.Google Scholar
McGuire, E., The Adoption Process — A Relationship Between Agency and Family. In (Picton, C.(Ed.), 1976), 101–105.Google Scholar
McWhinnie, A.M., The Adoptive Family: Identifications and Crises. Paper presented at Symposium C, “Family Crises and Coping Mechanisms”, August, 1970, Jerusalem.Google Scholar
Malone, T., Adoption and Crisis in the Third World: Thoughts on the Future, International Child Welfare Review, (International Union for Child Welfare), Geneva, vol. 29, June 1976, 20–25.Google Scholar
Phillips, E., The Victorian Adoption of Children Act 1964, Australian Journal of Social Work, vol. 18,no.3, 1965, 6–9.Google Scholar
Picton, C. (Ed.), Proceedings of First Australian Conference on Adoption, Melbourne, The Committee of the First Australian Conference on Adoption, 1976.Google Scholar
Pringle, M.L.K., Adoption Facts and Fallacies, New York, Humanities Press, 1966.Google Scholar
Reilly, E.L., Adoptive Parenting. In (Picton, C. (Ed.). 1976), 106–112.Google Scholar
Rowe, J. Parents, Children and Adoption, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1966.Google Scholar
Rowe, J., Adoption in a Changing Society. In (Picton, C.(Ed.). 1976), 8–17.Google Scholar
Rutter, M., Maternal Deprivation Reassessed, Harmondsworth, Penguin Books, 1972.Google Scholar
Victorian Social Welfare Department Annual Report, 1975-76.Google Scholar