Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T18:14:33.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Galilee Day Program: Alternative education and training strategies for young people in substitute care

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 February 2016

Abstract

Comprehensive research undertaken in 1995 and 1997 clearly establishes the educational needs of at-risk young people. Research by Webber and Hayduk (Leaving School Early) and Brooks et al (NYARS report Under-age School Leaving) establishes indicators contributing to under-age school leaving which are discussed in relation to the responsibility of schools in meeting the needs of at-risk students. Without revisiting the tenets of the deschooling movement which have been canvassed in detail in the pages of many books and education journals, the discussion explores the validity of alternative models to mainstream schooling. The paper assumes a certain inability of schooling to meet the needs of at-risk student; indeed it could be argued that the purpose of schooling generates and selects at-risk students. In a schooling culture which propagates the ideology of integration, the paper suggests the validity of an alternative and exclusion-based model of education. One such model has been established in 1997 in the Australian Capital Territory and this alternative education program is evaluated.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Apple, M. (1982) Education and Power, Ark, Boston.Google Scholar
Banks, B. & Stevens, R.P. (1997) The Complete Book of Everyday Christianity, Inter Varsity Press, Illinois.Google Scholar
Brooks, M., Milne, C., Paterson, K., Johansson, K. & Hart, K. (1997) Under-age School Leaving: A Report Examining Approaches to Assisting Young People At Risk of Leaving School Before the Legal School Leaving Age, National Youth Affairs Research Scheme (NYARS), National Clearninghouse for Youth Studies, Tasmania.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, C. & MacKenzie, D. (1996) ‘School Students at Risk’, Youth Studies Australia, December.Google Scholar
Center for Research on the Education of Students Placed at Risk (CRESPAR) (1997) Critical Issue: Using Technology to Enhance Engaged Learning for At-risk Students, http://www.ncrel.org/skrs/areas/issues/students/atrisk/at400.htm Google Scholar
Cumming, J. (1997) ‘Strategies for Surviving the Middle School Years’, Education Review, August.Google Scholar
Freire, P. (1972) Pedagogy of the Oppressed, Penguin, Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, D., Hughes, P. & Fitzgerald, R. (1996) An Evaluation of Computer Assisted Learning in Victorian Schools, Directorate of School Education, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Handy, C. & Aitken, R. (1986) Understanding Schools as Organisations, Penguin, Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
Harris, M. (1985) Good To Eat: Riddles of Food and Culture, New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Holt, S. (1995) Spirituality and the Meal: An Exercise in Practical Theology, MTh Thesis, Fuller Theological Seminary, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Illich, I. (1970) Deschooling Society, Penguin, Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
Jamrozik, A. & Sweeney, T. (1996) Children and Society, MacMillan, South Melbourne.Google Scholar
Juengst, S.C. (1992) Breaking Bread: The Spiritual Significance of Food, Louisville, Kentucky: Westminster/John Knox Press.Google Scholar
Long, N. & Morse, W. (1996) Conflict in the Classroom: The Education of At-Risk and Troubled Students, Pro-ed, Austin Texas.Google Scholar
Long, R. (1986) Radical Christianity and its Implications for a Christian Theory of Education, unpublished M.Ed. Thesis, University of Sydney.Google Scholar
Long, R. (1996) The Development of Themelic Schools in Australia, unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Western Sydney, Nepean.Google Scholar
Macklin, M. (1976) When Schools are Gone, University of Queensland Press, St Lucia.Google Scholar
MacClancy, J. (1992) Consuming Culture: Why You Eat What You Eat, Henry Holt and Company, New York.Google Scholar
Marginson, S. (1993) Education and Public Policy in Australia, Cambridge, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Meighan, R. (1986) A Sociology of Educating, Cassell, London.Google Scholar
Middleton, M. (1982) Marking Time; Alternatives in Australian Schooling, Methuen, North Ryde.Google Scholar
Owston, R. (1997) “The World Wide Web: A Technology to Enhance Teaching and Learning?’, Educational Researcher, March.Google Scholar
Pittman, K. (1996) Preventing Youth Problems and Promoting Youth Development: Competing Priorities or Inseparable Goals?, http://www.cyfc.umn.edu/Youth/konopka.html Google Scholar
Preston, N. & Symes, C. (1992) Schools and Classrooms: A Cultural Studies Analysis of Education, Longman, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Stacher, D. (1995) ‘At Risk Students Must Believe They can Change Their Own Future’, Academic Innovations, http://www.academicinnovations.com/believe.html Google Scholar
Visser, M. (1986) Much Depends on Dinner: The Extraordinary History and Mythology, Allure and Obsessions, Perils and Taboos of an Ordinary Meal, New York: Grove Press Google Scholar
Webber, C. & Hayduk, K. (1995) Leaving School Early: Report on a Research Study Examining Early School Leavers, and Those ‘At Risk’, Aged 13–16, in the ACT, Galilee Inc., Canberra.Google Scholar