Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-25T08:11:38.521Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Family, Courts and Media Discourses: The Contested Spaces of Time, and the Politics of the Protection of Children

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 November 2012

Pamela D. Schulz
Pamela D. Schulz*
Affiliation:
University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
*
address for correspondence: Dr Pamela D. Schulz, School of Communication and International Studies and Language, University of South Australia, St Bernards Road, Magill, South Australia 5072, Australia Email: pamela.schulz@unisa.edu.sa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This article, which is built on media discourse analysis, provides an insight into how public opinion on the work of courts has developed into a discourse of disapproval. The discourse of time is often used to evaluate the work of courts and tends to meet with disapproval when related to sentencing and when the Family Court fails to deliver equal parental access to children. The Family Court is also the subject of discourses of fear within the media, with stories often focusing on child abuse and horror stories of neglect designed to attract and recruit an audience to media outlets. In addition, the discourses facing the Family Court are now firmly tied to time as a major aspect of decision-making. Because of this contested view, child protection may be reduced to a secondary perspective. This paper recommends a change to discourses surrounding courts by all parties in order to facilitate better understanding.

Type
Opinion
Information
Children Australia , Volume 37 , Issue 4 , December 2012 , pp. 142 - 150
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altheide, D. (2003). Mass media crime and the discourse of fear. Hedgehog Review, 9, 9–25.Google Scholar
Attorney-General's Department (n.d.). Reports to the Attorney General. Retrieved from http://www.ag.gov.au/FamilyLawCouncil/Publications/ReportstotheAttorneyGeneral/Pages/default.aspxGoogle Scholar
Austin, P. (2010). Child-protection crisis. The Age, 21 October. Retrieved from http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/childprotection-crisis-20101020-16u7p.htmlGoogle Scholar
Australian Institute of Family Studies (2012). Child abuse and neglect statistics. Retrieved from http://aifs.govspace.gov.au/2012/06/18/child-abuse-and-neglect-statistics/Google Scholar
Baskin, B. (2012). Child thrown off Brisbane's Story Bridge in suspected murder-suicide. The Courier Mail, 20 February. Retrieved from http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/more-news/man-and-child-dead-after-apparent-fall-from-a-brisbane-bridge-police-say/story-fn7´8me2-1226275589047Google Scholar
Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Bell, A. (1995). News time. Time and Society, 3 (4), 305–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, J., Hall, K., & Holmes, K. (2008). Media Studies, AS and A2. London: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Black Celebrity Kids (2011). Halle Berry fights for custody of Nahla. 31 January. Retrieved from http://www.blackcelebkids.com/2011/01/halle-berry-fights-for-custody-of-nahla/Google Scholar
Breedveld, K. (1998). The double myth of flexibilisation: Trends in scattered hours and differences in time sovereignty. Time and Society, 7 (1), 129–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briggs, F. (2011a). Family Court and child protection issues. Paper presented at the ASCA Conference. Retrieved from http://asca.org.au/associations/8549/files/ASCA_paper.pdfGoogle Scholar
Briggs, F. (2011b). Smart parenting for safer kids. Melbourne: Jo Jo Publishing.Google Scholar
Doughty, S. (2012). Hundreds of children involved in bitter custody battles are being abducted and taken abroad. Mail Online, 2 April. Retrieved from http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2124289/Hundreds-children-involved-bitter-custody-battles-abducted-taken-abroad.html#ixzz1upHKZU1QGoogle Scholar
Fife Yeomans, J. (2012). Why do parents kill their kids? Daily Telegraph, 23 February. Retrieved from http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/national/why-do-parents-kill-their-kids/story-e6freuzr-1226279552769Google Scholar
Finkelhor, D., Hammer, H., & Sedlak, A.J. (2002). Non family abducted children: National estimates and characteristics. US Department of Justice Report. Retrieved from http://www.missingkids.com/en_US/documents/nismart2_nonfamily.pdfGoogle Scholar
Fonseca, M. (2002). Blackshirts accused of stalking ‘morally corrupt’ women. ABC World Today [transcript of broadcast], 25 July. Retrieved from http://www.abc.net.au/worldtoday/stories/s625671.htmGoogle Scholar
Gander, C. (2011). Family law is failing kids. The Drum Opinion. Retrieved from http://www.abc.net.au/unleashed/2732542.htmlGoogle Scholar
Gerace, A. (2012). Child abduction alert for Victoria. 774 ABC Radio. Transcript from 23 April. Retrieved from http://blogs.abc.net.au/victoria/2012/04/child-abduction-alert-for-victoria.htmlGoogle Scholar
Gitlin, T. (2001). Media unlimited: How the torrent of images and sounds overwhelms our lives. New York: Metropolitan Books.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (2002). The structural transformation of the public sphere. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hallahan, K. (1999). Seven models of framing: Implications for public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 11 (3), 205–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hochshild, K. (1997). The time bind: When home becomes work and work becomes home. California: Henry Holt.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hüllse, R. (2000). Looking beneath the surface: Invisible othering in the German discourse about Turkey's possible EU accession. Paper presented at the Ionian Conference, Corfu, Greece.Google Scholar
Jackman, C. (2010). Divided lives. The Weekend Australian, 27 November, pp. 18–21.Google Scholar
Johnson, R. (2012). Helicopter parents should brace for impact. The Telegraph. Retrieved from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/9319571/Helicopter-parents-should-brace-for-impact.htmlGoogle Scholar
Johnston, J. (2004). Communicating courts: The changing interface with courts and the media. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Griffiths University, Queensland, Australia.Google Scholar
Lee, L.F., Combes, J., & Marsh, A. (2003). Common ground: Tasmania Fear of Crime Project, report stage 2. Retrieved from http://www.crimeprevention.gov.au/Publications/Pages/Common_Ground_Tasmanian_Fear_of_Crime_Project_Stage_2_Report.aspx> which clearly outlines contested space theory approachesCrossRef+which+clearly+outlines+contested+space+theory+approaches>Google Scholar
Matheson, D. (2005). Media discourses: Analysing media texts. New York: Open University Press.Google Scholar
McInnes, E. (2011). Madness in Family Law: Competing discourses on mothers’ mental health in the Australian Family Law System. Paper presented at the 12th International Mental Health Conference Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.Google Scholar
Morris, B. (2005). Deadly dads: Men who murder their children. London: DVRC Quarterly.Google Scholar
National Council for Children Post-Separation (NCCPS) (2011). Family Law amendments can prevent further child abuse. Media Statement, 27 February. Retrieved from http://www.nccps.org.au/docs/media_statement-27-02-2011.htmlGoogle Scholar
National Rifle Association Headquarters, (n.d.). What is the Eddie Eagle GunSafe® Program? Retrieved from http://www.nrahq.org/safety/eddie/Google Scholar
Nicholas, S. (2008). Why more and more women are losing custody battles over their children. UK Daily Mail. Retrieved from http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1024304/Why-more-women-losing-custody-battles-children.htmlGoogle Scholar
O’ Shaughnessy, N.J. (2004). Politics and propaganda: Weapons of mass seduction. Manchester: Manchester University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potter, J. (2005). Representing reality. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Scheufele, D.A. (1999). Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication, Winter, 103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schokkenbroek, C. (1999). News stories: Structure time and evaluation. Time and Society, 8 (1), 59–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulz, P.D. (2010). Courts and judges on trial: Analysing and managing discourses of disapproval. NY & London: Lit Verlag Berlin Munster.Google Scholar
Schulz, P.D., & Cannon, A.J. (2010). Judicial time lords: Media direction vs judicial independence. International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences, 5 (1), 174–188.Google Scholar
Serani, D. (2011). If it bleeds, it leads: Understanding fear-based media. Retrieved from http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/two-takes-depression/201106/if-it-bleeds-it-leads-understanding-fear-based-media/commentsGoogle Scholar
Shenhav, S. (2005). Concise narratives: A structural analysis of political discourse. Discourse Studies, 7 (3), 315–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southerton, D. (2003). Squeezing time? Allocating practices, co-ordinating networks and scheduling society? Time & Society, 12 (1), 5–25.Google Scholar
Tanner, L. (2011). Sideshow: Dumbing down democracy. Melbourne: Scribe Publications.Google Scholar
Teo, P. (2000). Racism in the news: A critical discourse analysis of news reporting in two Australian newspapers. Discourse and Society, 11 (1), 7–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittaker, M. (2007). Abducted for love: Stolen generation – Australia. Retrieved from http://www.missionand-justice.org/abducted-for-love-stolen-children-australia/Google Scholar
Wilkinson, G. (2011). Killer driver Lionel Saunders walks free from court. Herald-Sun, 11 June. Retrieved from http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/victoria/killer-driver-walks-free-from-court/story-fn7x8me2-1226073305587Google Scholar