Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-k7p5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T22:57:23.191Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Breaking into schools: Establishing high quality human services in educational contexts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 February 2016

Abstract

This paper explores the ACT Government’s investment in a school based human services program. This program aims to improve educational and social outcomes for children and young people by creating effective working relationships between families, communities and their schools. It considers the contemporary challenges to achieving a quality service in a domain not normally inhabited by human services professionals. The main focus of the paper is an analysis of some of the factors which were considered in establishing a high quality service.

The paper draws attention to the importance of developing a conceptually sound program model, in particular one which demonstrates how evaluation can be integrated throughout the program cycle. It argues the importance of pursuing two key pathways to quality: the achievement of professional standards in program design, and the pursuit of the consumer voice in shaping and judging program performance.

The paper contends that program sustainability in this field of practice hinges on recognising who the consumers are, and achieving a range of outcomes which address their varied needs and priorities.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ACT Government (2001a) Schools As Communities: Program Guidelines 2001, Canberra.Google Scholar
ACT Government (2001b) Schools As Communities: The Research Context 2001, Canberra.Google Scholar
ACT Government (2000) Budget Papers 2000–2001, Treasury, ACT, Canberra.Google Scholar
Ainley, J., Graetz, B., Long, M. & Batten, M. (1995) Socioeconomic Status and School Education, Australian Council for Educational Research, Project funded by the Commonwealth Department of Employment and Training.Google Scholar
Botsman, P. (2001) ‘Independent schools, community management and innovation’ in Latham, M. and Botsman, P. (eds), The Enabling State: People Before Bureaucracy, Pluto Press, Australia.Google Scholar
Briggs, F. & Campbell, S. (2001) ‘How valuable are evaluations? The need for evaluations of community based child and family services’, Children Australia, Vol. 26, No. 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullen, P. & Onyx, J. (1999) Social Capital: Family Support Services and Neighbourhood and Community Centres in NSW, Local Human Services Association and Family Support Services Association of NSW.Google Scholar
Cant, R. (1997) ‘Interagency School Community Centres Pilot Project: Evaluation report’, unpublished paper, NSW Department of Education.Google Scholar
Cashmore, J. (2001) ‘Early Experiences and Brain Development’, National Child Protection Clearinghouse Newsletter, Vol. 9, No. 1, Winter.Google Scholar
Costin, L. (1969) ‘A Historical Review of School Social Work’, Social Casework, 50, pp, 439453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department of Human Services (2003) School Focussed Youth Service, www.dhs.vic.gov.au Google Scholar
Dryfoos, J.G. (1991) ‘School based social and health services for at risk studentsUrban Education, Vol. 26, No. I, pp.118137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dryfoos, J.G. (1996) ‘School linked services and beyond’, Addressing Barriers to Learning, Vol. 1, No. 2, Spring.Google Scholar
Franklin, C. & Allen-Meares, P. (1998) ‘School social workers are a critical part of the link’ in Freeman, E., Franklin, C., Fong, R., Shaffer, G., and Timberlake, E. (eds), Multisystem Skills and Interventions in School Social Work Practice, NASW Press, Inc., Washington.Google Scholar
Garbarino, J. & Sherman, D. (1980) ‘High risk neighbourhoods and high risk families: The human ecology of child maltreatment’, Child Development, Vol 47, pp.178185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grace, M. & School Social Work Special Interest Group, AASW (Vic Branch) (1996) Outsourcing School Social Work Services, Outer Urban Research and Policy Unit, Victoria University of Technology, Melton, Vic.Google Scholar
Guterman, N.B. (1999) ‘Enrolment strategies in early home visitation to prevent physical child abuse and neglect and the universal versus targeted debate: A meta analysis of population based and screening based programs’, Child Abuse and Neglect, Vol. 23, No. 9, pp.863890.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hampshire, A.& Smeaton, T. (2001) ‘Walking on stilts (and other things): Strengthening families and communities by building social capital’, Family Strengths Conference, Newcastle.Google Scholar
Jackson, A. & Donovan, F. (1999) Managing to survive, St Leonards, Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Jones, A. & May, J. (1992) Working in human services organisations, Pearson Education Australia.Google Scholar
Karoly, L.A., Greenwood, P.W., Everingham, S.S., Hoube, J., Kilburn, M., Rydell, C.P., Sanders, M., & Chiesa, J. (1998) Investing in our children: What we know and don’t know about the costs and benefits of early childhood interventions, RAND, Santa Monica.Google Scholar
Latham, M. & Botsman, P. (eds) (2001) The enabling state: People before bureaucracy, Pluto Press, Annandale, NSW.Google Scholar
Lawson, H.A. (1994) ‘Towards healthy learners, schools and communities’, Journal of Teacher Education, January-February, Vol. 45, No. 1, pp.6269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meares, P, Washington, R. & Walsh, B. (1986) Social work services in schools, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Mendes, P. (2001) ‘From minimal intervention to minimal support: Child protection services under the neo-liberal Kennett Government in Victoria 1992–1999’, Children-Australia, Vol. 26, No. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olds, D.L. (1988) ‘The Prenatal/Early Infancy Project’, in Price, R.H., Cowan, E.L. and Ramos-Mackay, R. (eds), 14 Ounces of Prevention: A Casebook for Practitioners, American Psychological Association, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Owens, J. & Rogers, P. (1999) Program evaluation forms and approaches, Allen and Unwin, Sydney.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, T. & Waterman, R. (1982) In search of excellence: Lessons from America’s best run companies, Harpers & Row, London.Google Scholar
Productivity Commission (2003) Social capital: Reviewing the concept and its policy implications, Commission Research Paper, Ausinfo, Canberra.Google Scholar
Ryan, M. (1996) ‘Redefining schools as sites for holistic service delivery’, Youth Issues Forum, Summer.Google Scholar
Runyan, D., Hunter, W., Socolar, R., Amaya-Jackson, L., English, D., Landsverk, J., Dubowitz, H., Browne, D., Bangdiwala, S. & Mathew, R. (1998) ‘Children who prosper in unfavourable environments: The relationship to social capital’, Paediatrics, Vol. 101, No, 1, pp.1218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scott, D. (2001) ‘Building communities that strengthen families’, Family Matters, AIFS, Issue No. 58, Autumn.Google Scholar
Scott-Skillman, T. (1992) Student services and special programs: A report on program effectiveness, Board of Governors, California Community Colleges, Sacramento.Google Scholar
Sedlak, M. & Schlossman, S. (1985) ‘Public schools and social services: Reassessing the progressive legacy’, Educational Theory, 35, pp.371383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streeter, C, Brannen, S. & Franklin, C. (1994) ‘Education reform in America: The Texas Governor’s Conference on Total Quality Management and the National Education Goals’, Social Work in Education, 16, pp.193198.Google Scholar
Sutherland, D. & Sokal, L.(2003) Resiliency and Capacity Building in Inner-City Learning Communities, Portage & Main Press, Winnipeg, MB.Google Scholar
Tomison, A. (2000) Evaluating child abuse prevention programs, National Child Protection Clearinghouse, Issues paper No. 12, Autumn.Google Scholar
Tomison, A. 2001, ‘A history of child protection: Back to the future’, Family Matters, No. 60, Spring/Summer.Google Scholar
Torres, S. (1998) ‘The status of school social workers in America’ in Freeman, E., Franklin, C., Fong, R., Shaffer, G., & Timberlake, E. (eds), Multisystem Skills and Interventions in School Social Work Practice, NASW Press, Inc., Washington.Google Scholar
Tyack, D. (1992) ‘Health and human services in public schools: Historical perspectives’, Future of Children, 2(1), pp.1931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar