Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T22:20:51.338Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Being ‘child centred’ in child protection: What does it mean?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 February 2016

Gail Winkworth  and
Morag McArthur
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In 2005 the Institute of Child Protection Studies, Australian Catholic University, was approached by the ACT Government and asked to evaluate the ‘child centredness’ of its child protection policies and procedures. An early review of the literature discovered some use of the term ‘child centred’ in government documents but very little clear indication of its meaning in the theoretical and empirical literature. This paper canvasses the literature and develops a set of principles for child centred practice which may apply to all child and family agencies. In developing these principles, the researchers identified four key themes which provide a broad, overarching framework for child centred approaches. These themes emphasise the importance of: recognising critical time frames in childhood and adolescence; taking into account the developmental needs of children and young people in all practice contexts; providing children and young people with appropriate opportunities to participate in decisions that affect them; and promoting a collaborative approach to influencing children’s multiple environments. The researchers claim these principles can be used to provide the basis for evaluating policies and practices and for ongoing training.

Type
Research Article
Information
Children Australia , Volume 31 , Issue 4 , 2006 , pp. 13 - 21
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AIHW—see Australian Institute of Health and Welfare Google Scholar
HREOC & ALRC—see Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission & Australian Law Reform Commission Google Scholar
NSW CCYP & CCYP (Qld)—see NSW Commission for Children and Young People & Commission for Children and Young People (Qld) Google Scholar
Ariers, A. & Kettle, J. (1998) When things go wrong: Young people’s experience of getting access to the complaints procedure in residential care, National Institute for Social Work, London.Google Scholar
Armytage, P., Boffa, J. & Armitage, E. (1998) ‘Professional practice frameworks: Linking prevention, support and protection’, presented at Twelfth International ISPCAN Congress on Child Abuse and Neglect, Protecting Children: Innovation and Inspiration, Auckland, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Australian Capital Territory (1999) Children and Young People Act.Google Scholar
Australian Institute of Health & Welfare (2006) Child protection Australia 2004–2005, Child Welfare Series no. 38, Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Canberra.Google Scholar
Baldry, S. & Kemmis, J. (1996) What is it like to be looked after by Camden? A report for Camden Social Services Department, Camden Social Services, London.Google Scholar
Bell, M. (2002) ‘Promoting children’s rights through the use of the relationship’, Child and Family Social Work, 7, 1–11.Google Scholar
Belsky, J. (1980) ‘Child maltreatment: An ecological integration’, American Psychology, 35(4).Google Scholar
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979) The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Bronfenbrenner, U. (2004) Making human beings human: Bioecological perspectives on human development, Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Bronfenbrenner, U., Moen, P. & Garbarino, J. (1984) ‘Children, family, and community’, in Parke, R. (ed.), The family: Review of child development research. Sage, New York.Google Scholar
Cashmore, J. (2001) ‘What can we learn from the US experience on permanency planning?’, Australian Journal of Family Law, 15, 215–229.Google Scholar
Cooper, D. (1998) ‘More law and more rights: Will children benefit?’, Child and Family Social Work, 3, 77–86.Google Scholar
Cowan, A., Steinberg, A. & Woodhouse, B. (2000) ‘Child-centred, vertically structured, and interdisciplinary: An integrative approach to children’s policy, practice and research’, presented at 10th World Conference of the International Society of Family Law, Family Law: Process, Practices and Pressures, Brisbane.Google Scholar
Currie, J. (2002) Early childhood intervention programs: What do we know?’, working paper from the Children’s Roundtable, The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Daro, D. (2003) ‘Before substantiation: The role for child welfare agencies in preventing maltreatment’, presented at Child Welfare Services Research and its Policy Implications conference, 20–21 March, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Dartington Social Research Unit (1995) Child protection: Messages from research, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Department of Health (2000) Framework for the assessment of children in need and their families. Department of Health (UK), HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Edwards, M. & Wearing, M. (2003) The voice of front-line workers in family support work: A qualitative study of early intervention in child abuse and neglect, Research Report No 2, Burnside, Sydney.Google Scholar
Fancourt, R. (1998) ‘Brain development and organisation: The basis of children’s potential, vulnerability and resilience’, in Taylor, N.J. & Smith, A.B. (eds.), Enhancing children’s potential: Minimising risk and maximising resiliency, proceedings of the Children’s Issues Centre Second Child and Family Policy Conference, Dunedin, NZ.Google Scholar
Garbarino, J. (1976) ‘A preliminary study of some ecological correlates of child abuse: The impact of socioeconomic stress on mothers’, Child Development, Vol. 47, 178–185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glaser, D. (2000) ‘Child abuse and neglect and the brain: A review’, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41, 97–116.Google Scholar
Holland, S., O’Neill, S., Scourfield, J. & Pithouse, A. (2003) Outcomes in Family Group Conferences for children on the brink of care: A study of child and family participation, Cardiff University, School of Social Sciences, Cardiff, Wales.Google Scholar
Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission & Australian Law Reform Commission (1997) Speaking for ourselves: Children and the legal process. Issues Paper No. 18, Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra.Google Scholar
Karoly, L.A., Greenwood, P.W., Everingham, S.S., Hoube, J., Kilburn, M.R., Rydell, C.P., Sanders, M. & Chiesa, J. (1998) Investing in our children: What we know and don’t know about the costs and benefits of early childhood intervention, RAND, Santa Monica.Google Scholar
Lupton, C. & Nixon, P. (1999) Empowering practice? A critical appraisal of the family group conference approach. The Policy Press, Bristol.Google Scholar
Maluccio, A. N., Fein, E. & Olmstead, K. A. (1986) Permanency planning for children: Concepts and methods, Tavistock, London.Google Scholar
McCain, M. & Mustard, J.F. (1999) Reversing the real brain drain: Early years study. Final Report, Canadian Institute for Advanced Research and The Founders’ Network, Toronto.Google Scholar
Mustard, J.F. (2000) ‘Early child development and the brain: The base for health, learning and behaviour throughout life, presented at World Bank Conference ‘Investing in our children’s future’, Washington.Google Scholar
National Crime Prevention (1999) Pathways to prevention: Developmental and early intervention approaches to crime in Australia, National Crime Prevention, Attorney-General’s Department, Canberra.Google Scholar
Newman, L. & Vimpani, G. (2004) ‘Understanding and responding to childhood abuse and trauma’, presented at ACWA Conference: ‘Knowledge into Action’, Sydney.Google Scholar
NSW Commission for Children and Young People & Commission for Children and Young People (Qld) (2004) A head start for Australia: An early years framework, NSW Commission for Children and Young People and Commission for Children and Young People (Qld), Sydney.Google Scholar
Queensland Crime and Misconduct Commission (2004) Protecting children: An inquiry into abuse of children in foster care. Crime and Misconduct Commission, Brisbane.Google Scholar
Rutter, M. (1987) ‘Psychosocial resilience and protective mechanisms’, American Journal Orthopsychiatry, 57, 16–31.Google Scholar
Rutter, M. (2002) ‘The interplay of nature nurture and developmental influences: The challenge ahead for mental health’. Archives of General Psychiatry, 59, 996–1000.Google Scholar
Rutter, M., Maughan, B., Mortimore, P., Ouston, J. & Smith, A. (1979) Fifteen thousand hours. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Schofield, G. (2003) ‘The research overview: Stability in foster care’, seminar held at the Royal Academy of Engineering, Westminster, 22/23 January.Google Scholar
Schore, A. (2000) ‘Attachment and the regulation of the right brain’, Attachment and Human Development, 2, 23–47.Google Scholar
Scott, D. (2001) ‘Building communities that strengthen families’, Family Matters, Vol. 58, Autumn.Google Scholar
Scott, D. & O’Neil, D. (1996) Beyond child rescue: Developing family centred practice at St Luke’s, Allen & Unwin, St Leonards.Google Scholar
Scott, J. (2000) ‘Children as respondents: The challenge for quantitative methods’, in James, A. & Christensen, P. (eds.), Conducting research with children, Falmer Press, New York, 98–119.Google Scholar
Silver, J. (2000) ‘Integrating advances in infant research with child welfare policy and practice’, Protecting Children, 16, 12–21.Google Scholar
Sinclair, R. (1998) ‘Involving children in planning their care’, Child and Family Social Work, 3, 137–142.Google Scholar
Sinclair, R. & Franklin, A. (2000) Young people’s participation. Quality Protects Research Briefing No. 3, Department of Health (UK), research in practice, Making Research Count.Google Scholar
Stanley, F. (2001) ‘Towards a national partnership for developmental health and wellbeing’, Family Matters, No. 58, Autumn, Australian Institute of Family Studies.Google Scholar
Statham, W. (1978) Radicals in social work, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Tomison, A. (2004) Current issues in child protection policy and practice: Informing the Northern Territory Department of Health and Community Services child protection review. National Child Protection Clearinghouse, Australian Institute of Family Studies and Northern Territory Government, Casuarina, NT.Google Scholar
Tomison, A. & Wise, S. (1999) ‘Community-based approaches in preventing child maltreatment’, Issues in Child Abuse Prevention, Vol. 11, National Child Protection Clearinghouse. Australian Institute of Family Studies, Melbourne, Vic.Google Scholar
Triseliotis, J. (2002) ‘Long-term foster care or adoptions? The evidence examined’, Child and Family Social Work, 7, 23–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Utting, W. (1997) People like us: The report on the review of safeguards for children living away from home. The Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Vardon, C. (2004) The Territory as parent: Review of the safely of children in care in the ACT and of ACT Child Protection Management, ACT Government, Canberra.Google Scholar