Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-68ccn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T12:47:58.392Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Roman Catholicism and the Prussian State in the Early 1850s

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 December 2008

Simon Hyde
Simon Hyde
Affiliation:
Christ Church Oxford
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The relationship between the Roman Catholic church and the state in nineteenth-century German history appears to have been plagued by discord and mistrust. From the secularization of church lands and the dissolution of sovereign ecclesiastical territories at the beginning of the century to the Kulturkampf of the 1870s, church and state found themselves repeatedly at loggerheads. One thinks of the negotiations between Prussia and Rome on a concordat after 1815, the Cologne mixed marriage controversy of 1837, the Frankfurt Parliament's debates on Article III of the Reich Constitution in 1848, and the hostility aroused by the Raumer decrees of 1852. In a recent article on the Catholic church in Westphalia during the 1850s and his book on popular Catholicism in nineteenth-century Germany, Jonathan Sperber has challenged the validity of this picture of conflict between church and state.

Type
Articles
Information
Central European History , Volume 24 , Issue 2-3 , June 1991 , pp. 95 - 121
Copyright
Copyright © Conference Group for Central European History of the American Historical Association 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

I must gratefully acknowledge the generosity of the British Council in funding an ascetic two months in Merseburg during the Spring of 1990. Special thanks are due to Robert Vilain for alimentary support. Kenneth Barkin, Michael John, Nicholas Owen, Wolfram Pyta, Glyn Redworth, and Jonathan Wright read the paper. I am uncertain precisely how much blame they will accept.

1. Sperber, Jonathan, “Competing Counterrevolutions: Prussian State and the Catholic Church in Westphalia during the 1850s,” Central European History (CEH) 19 (1986): 45–62,CrossRefGoogle Scholar and his Popular Catholicism in Nineteenth-Century Germany (Princeton, 1984).Google Scholar

2. Compare similar feelings about the implications of Sperber's work in Anderson's, Margaret L. article “The Kulturkampf and the Course of German History,” CEH 19 (1986): 82–84.Google Scholar The reservations of Vernon L. Lidtke, “Catholics and Politics in Nineteenth-Century Germany: A Comment,” ibid., 117–19, should also be noted, especially his remarks about the diversity of the Catholic community.

3. Quoted in Sperber, “Counterrevolutions,” 55.

4. My stress, ibid., 61. Cf. Sperber, “The Transformation of Catholic Associations in the Northern Rhineland and Westphalia, 1830–1870” Journal of Social History 15 (1981): 257.Google Scholar

5. Sperber, Catholicism, 102f.

6. See Shorter, Edward “Middle-Class Anxiety in the German Revolution of 1848,” Journal of Social History 3 (1969): 189–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7. See, for example, Kölnische Zeitung (KZ) no. 279, 31 October 1852.

8. This is not the place to go into this vastly complex issue, but for some main lines of thought the reader might consult: Boldt, Werner, Die Anfänge des deutschen Parteiwesens (Paderborn, 1971), 13–31, 44–72;Google ScholarNipperdey, Thomas, Die Organisation der deutschen Parteien vor 1918 (Düsseldorf, 1961), 9–12;Google Scholaridem, “Grundprobleme der deutschen Parteigeschichte im 19. Jahrhundert,” in Ritter, Gerhard A., ed., Die deutschen Parteien vor 1918 (Cologne, 1973), 32–55;Google ScholarGrünthal, Günther, Parlamentarismus in Preussen 1848–49–1857–58 (Düsseldorf, 1982), 391–413;Google ScholarLangewiesche, Dieter, “Die Anfänge der deutschen Parteien—Partei, Fraktion und Verein in der Revolution von 1848–49,” Geschichte und Gesellschaft 4 (1978): 325–61;Google ScholarKramer, Helmut, Fraktionsverbindungen in den deutschen Volksvertretungen 1819–1849 (Berlin/Munich, 1968);Google Scholar and Mattheisen, Donald J., “Die Fraktionen der preussischen Nationalversammlung von 1848,” in Jarausch, Konrad, ed., Quantifizierung in der Geschichtswissenschaft (Düsseldorf, 1976), 149–67.Google Scholar

9. For contemporary recognition of this phenomenon see KZ no. 292, 13 November 1852.

10. See Kaltheuner, Herbert, Der Freiherr Georg von Vincke und die Liberalen in der preussischen zweiten Kammer 1849–1855 (Münster, 1928), 14f.Google Scholar

11. See Siemann, Wolfram, Die deutsche Revolution von 1848–49 (Frankfurt a. M., 1985), 127–31, 140f.Google Scholar, and Grünthal, Parlamentarismus, 404–13.

12. Sheehan, James J., German History 1770–1866 (Oxford, 1989), 676.Google Scholar

13. Müller, Klaus, “Das Rheinland als Gegenstand der historischen Wahlsoziologie,” Annalen des historischen Vereins für den Niederrhein 167 (1965): 134f.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Cf. Regierungspräsident (RP) Kühlwetter's Comment on the election of certain “democratic” electors in 1852: “Der Grund ihrer Wahl ist nicht ihre Partheistellung, sondern ihre sonstige Stellung und Geltung im bürgerlichen Leben.” RP Kühlwetter to Interior Minister (IM) Westphalen, 29 October 1852, in Zentrales Staatsarchiv, Merseburg (ZStAM) Rep 77 Tit 496a no. 53 Adh Ih Bd. 1.

14. Cf. Günther Grünthal's claim that only some 35 percent of the Second Chamber's sitting members were returned after the 1852 elections. Continuity of membership in the First Chamber appears to have been even less. Grünthal, Parlamentarismus, 341–43.

15. RP Aachen to IM Westphalen, 4 November 1852, ZStAM Rep 77 Tit 496a no. 53 Adh lh Bd. 1.

16. My sources here are the Interior Ministry's compilation of results in ZStAM Rep 77 Tit 496a no. 53 Bd. 1, and Lauter, Franz, Preussens Volksvertretung in der zweiten Kammer und im Hause der Abgeordneten vom Februar 1849 bis Mai 1877 (Berlin, 1877).Google Scholar

17. Vierhaus, Rudolf, “Preussen und die Rheinlande, 1815–1915,” Rheinische Vierteljahrsblätter 30 (1965): 170f.Google Scholar

18. Again two candidates, Moritz von Bethmann-Hollweg and Clemens von WaldbottBornheim, received double mandates.

19. Schierbaum, Hansjürgen, Die politischen Wahlen in den Eifel– und Moselkreisen des Regierungsbezirks Trier 1848–1867 (Düsseldorf, 1960), 88–91,Google Scholar and Lauter, Volksvertretung, 75f.

20. See Oberpräsident (OP) Kleist–Retzow to IM Westphalen, 5 & 6 November 1852, ZStAM Rep 77 Tit 496a no. 53 Adh Ih Bd. 1.

21. Landrat (LR) Elberfeld to IM Westphalen, 3 November 1852, ibid.

22. LR Cochem to IM Westphalen, 3 November 1852, ibid.

23. RP Aachen to IM Westphalen, 4 November 1852, ibid.

24. Denk, Heinz, “Die Wahien zum preussischen Abgeordnetenhaus und zum konstituirenden Reichstag des norddeutschen Bundes in der Stadt Köln in den Jahren 1849–1867” (unpublished Ph.D. diss., Bonn, 1954), 101Google Scholar. For the original see Landeshauptarchiv, Koblenz (LHAK) 403 8444 fo. 160.

25. Schierbaum, Wahlen, 93.

26. See Rejewski, Harro-Jürgen, Die Pflicht zur politischen Treue im preussischen Beamtenrecht (1850–1860) (Berlin, 1972), 36–56, especially 44–48Google Scholar, and Gillis, John R., The Prussian Bureaucracy in Crisis, 1840–1860 (Stanford, 1971), 145ff.Google Scholar

27. Copy in LHAK 403 8452 fo. 153.

28. Bellot, Josef, “Das politische Leben in den Saarkreisen von der Revolution von 1848–49 bis zum deutsch–französischen Krieg von 1870–71” (unpublished Ph.D. diss., Bonn, 1951), 94.Google Scholar

29. RP Trier to IM Westphalen, 6 November 1852, ZStAM Rep 77 Tit 496a no. 53 Adhlh Bd. 1.

30. Kaiser, Renate, Die politischen Strömungen in den Kreisen Bonn und Rheinbach 1848–1870 (Bonn, 1963), 102.Google Scholar

31. LR Euskirchen to IM Westphalen, 8 November 1852, ZStAM Rep 77 Tit 496a no. 53 Adh Ih Bd 1.

32. Quoted in Röttges, Otto, Die politischen Wahlen in den linksrheinischen Kreisen des Rgierungsbezirks Düsseldorf 1848–1867 (Kempen/Niederrhein, 1964). 163Google Scholar.

33. Deutsche Volkshalle (DVh) nos. 77, 78, & 80, 3, 4, & 6 April, 1851.

34. For Catholic grossdeutsch sentiment see Birke, Adolf M., “German Catholics and the Quest for National Unity” see Schulze, Hagen, ed., Nation-Building in Central Europe (Leamington Spa, 1987) 51–63.Google Scholar

35. DVh no. 32, 8 February 1851. See also Bachem, Karl, Joseph Bachem und die Entwicklung der katholischen Presse in Deutschland, 2 vols. (Cologne, 1912), 2:253.Google Scholar

36. For some general observations see Blackbourn, David, Populists and Patricians (London, 1987), 143ff.Google Scholar

37. DVh no. 19, 24 January 1852.

38. For the relevant passages of the ALR see Heinen, Ernst, Staatliche Macht und Katholizismus in Deutschland, 2 vols. (Paderborn, 1967–1979), 1:41f.Google Scholar

39. Croon, Gustav, Der rheinische Provinziallandtag bis zum Jahre 1874 (Reprinted ed., Cologne, 1974), 43.Google Scholar

40. See Hürten, Heinrich, Kurze Geschichte des deutschen Katholizismus 1800–1960 (Mainz, 1986), 79.Google Scholar

41. Huber, Ernst Rudolf, Deutsche Verfassungsgeschichte seit 1789, 7 vols. (Stuttgart, 1957–1984), 3:116f. & 174ff.Google Scholar

42. Birke, “Catholics,” 56f., Repgen, Konrad, Märzbewegung und Maiwahlen des Revolutionjahres 1848 im Rheinland (Bonn, 1955) 102–14, 162–64, & 185–97.Google Scholar

43. Cf. Repgen, Konrad, “Klerus und Politik 1848. Die Kölner Geistlichen im politischen Leben des Revolutionsjahres—als Beitrag zu einer ‘Parteigeschichte von unten’,” in his Von der Reformation zur Gegenwart (Paderborn, 1988), 99–128.Google Scholar

44. Heinen, , Macht, 1:100.Google Scholar

45. Lönne, Karl-Egon, Politischer Katholizismus im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert (Frankfurt a. M., 1986), 110.Google Scholar

46. Heinen, , Macht, 1:101.Google Scholar

47. See Hürten, Geschichte, 81ff., as well as his “Katholische Verbände,” in Rauscher, Anton, ed., Der soziale und politische Katholizismus. Entwicklungslinien in Deutschland 1803–1963, 2 vols. (Munich/Vienna, 1982), 2:230–41,Google Scholar and Heinen, , Macht, 1:97f. & 113–15.Google Scholar

48. Wehler, Hans-Ulrich, Deutsche Gesellschaftsgeschichte, 2 vols. (Munich, 1987), 2:477.Google Scholar

49. Herrmann, Alfred, “Regierung und Presse am Rhein im Vormärz,” in Historische Aufsätze. Aloys Schulte zum 70. Geburtstag gewidmet von Schülern und Freunden (Düsseldorf, 1927), 291f.Google Scholar

50. Heinen, , Macht, 1:104–7Google Scholar, and Roegele, Otto B., “Presse und Publizistik des deutschen Katholizismus 1803–1963,” in Rauscher, , ed., Katholizismus, 2:409–14.Google Scholar

51. DVh no. 36, 13 February 1851.

52. On the historiography of the 1850s see Siemann, Wolfram, Gesellschaft im Aufbruch. Deutschland 1849–71 (Frankfurt a. M. 1990), 11f.Google Scholar

53. See, for example, DVh nos. 2 & 32, 3 January & 8 February 1851.

54. DVh nos. 32 & 36, 8 & 13 February 1851.

55. DVh no. 35, 12 February 1851.

56. KZ no. 172, 16 July 1852.

57. DVh no. 70, 25 March 1851.

58. DVh no. 216, 18 September 1851.

59. DVh no. 225, 28 September 1851.

60. See von Petersdorff, Hermann, Kleist-Retzow. Ein Lebensbild (Stuttgart and Berlin, 1907), 194ff.Google Scholar

61. See Heinrichs, Joseph, Die Reaktivierung der Kreis- und Provinzialstände (Bonn, 1917), 38,Google Scholar and also DVh nos. 214 & 217, 16 & 19 September 1851.

62. DVh no. 228, 2 October 1851.

63. DVh no. 241, 17 October 1851.

64. See, for example, the Cologne administration's monthly newspaper report, 9 October 1852, in ZStAM Geheimes Zivilkabinett, 2.2.1, no. 16305 fos. 109–25.

65. DVh no. 234, 10 October 1852, Elberfelder Zeitung no. 217, 9 September 1852, and DVh no. 212, 15 September 1852.

66. Bachem, , Bachem, 2:217.Google Scholar

67. Cf. DVh no. 212, 15 September 1852, and also Historisch-politische Blätter 31 (1853): 205.Google Scholar

68. DVh no. 221, 25 September 1852.

69. DVh nos. 225, 245, & 246, 30 September, 23 & 24 October 1852.

70. DVh no. 233, 9 October 1852.

71. See Bachem, , Bachem, 2:283f.Google Scholar

72. Ibid., 302.

73. Polizeidirektor (Pol.D) Kehler to RP Breslau, 22 October 1852, ZStAM Rep 77 Tit 496a no. 57 fos. 15–16a.

74. Schlesische Zeitung (Schlz) no. 277, 21 October 1852. A similar appeal is to be found in SchlZ no. 269, 12 October 1852. Copies of both in ZStAM Rep 77 Tit 496a no. 57 fos. 79f.

75. Gesetzsammlung für die Königlichen Preussischen Staaten 1850, 18f., 27 & 214f.

76. DVh no. 245, 23 October 1852, and Bachem, , Bachem, 2:303.Google Scholar

77. Westfälischer Merkur no. 240, 16 October 1852, and Saar- und Mosel Zeitung no. 252, 23 October 1852. For their effect see RP Münster to IM Westphalen, 24 October 1852, RP Aachen to IM Westphalen, 24 October 1852, and RP Trier to IM Westphalen, 26 October 1852, ZStAM Rep 77 Tit 496a no. 53 Bd. 1 fos. 186–90, 192f., & 222f.

78. LR Trier to IM Westphalen, 3 November 1852. ZStAM Rep 77 Tit 496a no. 53 Adh Ih Bd. 1.

79. RP Trier to IM Westphalen, 6 November 1852, ibid.

80. RP Köln to IM Westphalen, 29 October 1852, ibid.

81. LR Geldern to IM Westphalen, 4 November 1852, ibid.

82. RP Trier to IM Westphalen, 31 October 1852, ibid.

83. RP Aachen to IM Westphalen, 29 October 1852, ibid.

84. ZStAM 2.2.1, no. 16342 fos. 155–68.

85. Denk, “Wahlen,” 94, and Kaiser, Strömungen, 98.

86. See Müller, “Rheinland,” 134f.

87. ZStAM 2.2.1. no. 16622 fos. 110–17.

88. Schmidt, Paul, Die Wahlen im Regierungsbezirk Koblenz 1849 bis 1867–69 (Bonn, 1971), 165f.Google Scholar

89. LR Düren to IM Westphalen, 3 November 1852, ZStAM Rep 77 Tit 496a no. 53 Adh Ih Bd. 1.

90. LRAV Prüm to IM Westphalen, 3 November 1852, ibid.

91. LR Cochem to IM Westphalen, 26 March 1853, ibid.

92. RP Düsseldorf to IM Westphalen, 22 November 1852, ibid.

93. Bürgermeister (BM) Josten to LR Kempen, 14 November 1852, ibid.

94. LR Münsterberg to RP Breslau, 30 October 1852, ZStAM Rep 77 Tit 496a no. 57.

95. RP Breslau to IM Westphalen, 1 November 1852, ibid.

96. LR Gladbach to RP Düsseldorf, 4 November 1852, ZStAM Rep 77 Tit 496a no. 53 Adh Ih Bd. 1. Cf. the Trier police report for November, 1852, which claimed that the clerical party had dominated the elections “with an impertinence and shamelessness not even managed by the Democrats in 1848.” ZStAM Rep 77 Tit 375 no. 10, Bd. 1, fo. 125.

97. RP Trier to IM Westphalen, 6 November 1852, ZStAM Rep 77 Tit 496a no. 53 Adh Ih Bd. 1.

98. Haas, Arnim, “Die Wahlen zum preussischen Abgeordnetenhaus im Regierungsbezirk Aachen von der deutschen Revolution 1848–49 bis zum deutschfranzösischen Krieg” (unpublished Ph.D. diss., Bonn, 1954), 74.Google Scholar It would be as well to note here that Kühlwetter was a Catholic. See Poestges, Dieter, Die preussische Personalpolitik im Regierungsbezirk Aachen von 1815 bis zum Ende des Kulturkampfes (Aachen, 1975), 127.Google Scholar

99. DVh no. 263, 14 November 1852.

100. Bachem, Karl, Vorgeschichte, Geschichte und Politik der deutschen Zentrumspartei, 9 vols. (Cologne/Aalen, 1927–1967), 2:103ffGoogle Scholar. Also ZStAM Rep 169C Abschn. 26 no. 46 Bd. 1 fos. 6f.

101. For the statutes see Donner, Hermann, Die katholische Fraktion in Preussen 1852–1858 (Leipzig, 1909), 77f.Google Scholar

102. Donner, Fraktion, 3, and also Bachem, , Vorgeschichte, 2:123.Google Scholar

103. DVh no. 251, 30 October 1852.

104. Bachem, , Vorgeschichte, 2:111, 119f.Google Scholar

105. For some of Reichensperger's early liberal political and economic ideas, see Fenske, Hans, Vormärz und Revolution 1840–1849 (Darmstadt, 1976), 223–33.Google Scholar

106. Bachem, , Vorgeschichte, 2:124.Google Scholar

107. See Donner, Fraktion, 36–55.

108. See a copy in LHAK 403 9035 fo. 59.

109. Grünthal, Parlamentarismus, 423.

110. Bachem, , Bachem, 2:394–415.Google Scholar

111. Sperber, “Counterrevolutions,” 60f.

112. Bachem, , Bachem, 2:407f.Google Scholar

113. Limitations of space have made it impossible here to go into this subject as deeply as I would have wished. I shall, however, return to it in a future article, the purpose of which will be to examine the relationship of Catholics, their political representatives, and the Church to the Prussian State in the period between 1852 and 1858.

114. IM Westphalen to the King, 21 January 1853, ZStAM HA Rep 50 J1563 fos. 44–48.

115. Bismarck to Manteuffel, 15 November 1852, in von Poschinger, Heinrich, Preussen im Bundestag 1851 bis 1859, 4 vols. (Leipzig, 1882–1884), 4:128.Google Scholar

116. Ibid., 131.

117. Quoted in Schoeps, Hans-Joachim, Preussen. Geschichte eines Staates (Berlin, 1966), 370f.Google Scholar