Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-fwgfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T15:46:02.840Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bismarck as Seen from the Nearest Church Steeple: A Comment on Michael Stürmer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 December 2008

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Suggestions and Debates
Copyright
Copyright © Conference Group for Central European History of the American Historical Association 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Italics mine.

2. Brecht, Arnold to writer, 11 13, 1949. Anschütz wrote his memoirs, Aus meinem Leben (completed in December 1936), but they were never published. A typescript copy is in the possession of the writer.Google Scholar

3. That German constitutional historians neglect English precedents at their peril has been pointed out recently by Lenk, Leonhard, “Das Modell England in der bayerischen Verfassungsdiskussion zwischen 1770 und 1818,” in Gesellschaft und Herrschaft. Forschungen zu sozial- und landesgeschichtlichen Problemen … Eine Festgabe für Karl Bosl zum 60. Geburtstag (Munich, 1969), pp. 284–99.Google Scholar Note also Friedrich Naumann's conversion from the Bonapartist ideal to the desirability of a constitutional evolution along English lines, in Fehrenbach, Elisabeth, Wandlungen des deutschen Kaisergedankens, 1871–1918 (Munich, 1969), pp. 207–8.Google Scholar

4. Fehrenbach, p. 143n., points to the need for a study of the relations between Kaiser, Reich, and Bundesfürsten. The writer has for some years been engaged in research designed to fill that gap. Some aspects of it are discussed in his Bismarck's Unfinished Empire,” South Atlantic Quarterly, lxv (1966), 205–14.Google Scholar