Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T14:59:38.513Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Successful transition for adolescent survivors of CHD: the Cambridge cardiac transition pathway

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 May 2023

Norah Y.S. Yap*
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatric Cardiology, University Hospital Southampton, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 6YD, England, UK
Parth Patil
Affiliation:
School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, England, UK
Carole Phoenix
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology, Royal Papworth Hospital, Papworth Everard, Cambridge CB23 3RE, England, UK
Katie Bradly Russell
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatrics, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, England, UK
Clive Lewis
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology, Royal Papworth Hospital, Papworth Everard, Cambridge CB23 3RE, England, UK
Robert Yates
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital, Great Ormond Street, London WC1N 3JH, England, UK
Wilf Kelsall
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatrics, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, England, UK
*
Address for correspondence: Dr Norah Y. S. Yap, Paediatric Cardiology Trainee, Southampton General Hospital, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 6YD, England, UK. E-mail: norahyap@doctors.org.uk

Abstract

Purpose:

National standards to ensure effective transition and smooth transfer of adolescents from paediatric to adult services are available but data on successful transition in CHD are limited. The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of our transition pathway.

Methods:

Adolescents with CHD, aged 15–19 years, who attended the joint cardiac transition clinic between 2009 and 2018 were identified from the Patient Administration Systems. Patient attendance at their first adult CHD service appointment at Royal Papworth Hospital was recorded.

Results:

179 adolescents were seen in the joint cardiac transition clinic in the 9-year study period. The median age of the patients when seen was 16 (range 15–19) years. 145 patients were initially planned for transfer to the Royal Papworth Hospital adult CHD service. Three patients were subsequently excluded and the success of the transfer of care in 142 patients were analysed. 112 (78%) attended their first follow-up in the adult CHD clinic as planned, 28 (20%) attended after reminders were sent out with 5/28 requiring multiple reminders, and only 2 (1.4%) failed to attend. Overall, transfer of care was achieved in 140 (98.6%) patients.

Conclusion:

A dedicated joint cardiac transition clinic involving multi-professional medical and nursing teams from paediatric and adult cardiology services appears to achieve high engagement rates with the adult services. This approach allows a ‘face’ to be put on a named clinician delivering the adult service and should be encouraged.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Somerville, J. The grown-up congenital hearts: good care is the profession’s responsibility. Brit J Cardiol 1998; 3: 135.Google Scholar
Townsend, N, Bhatnagar, P, Wichramasinghe, K, Williams, J, Vujcich, D, Rayner, M. Children and Young People Statistics. British Heart Foundation, London, 2013: 15.Google Scholar
National Service Framework for Children, Young People and Maternity Services. Department for Education and Skills, Department of Health. Transition: Getting it right for young people, 2006: 14Google Scholar
Sawyer, SM, Blair, S, Bowes, G. Chronic illness in adolescents: transfer or transition to adult services? J Paediatr Child Health 1997; 33: 8890.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dimopoulos, K, Favoccia, C, Shaughnessy Lm Alonso-Gonzales, R. Transition to adult care in adolescents with congenital heart disease. Prog Pediatr Cardiol 2018; 51: 6266. DOI 10.1016/j.ppedcard.2018.10.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blum, RW, Garell, D, Hodgman, CH, et al. Transition from child-centred to adult health-care systems for adolescents with chronic conditions. A position paper of the society for adolescent medicine. J Adolesc Health 1993; 14: 570576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Report of the British Cardiac Society Working Party. Report of the british cardiac society working party. Grown-up congenital heart (GUCH) disease: current needs and provision of service for adolescents and adults with congenital heart disease in the UK. Heart 2002; 88: i1i14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sable, C, Foster, E, Uzark, K, et al. Best practices in managing transition to adulthood for adolescents with congenital heart disease: the transition process and medical and psychosocial issues. A scientific statement from the American heart association. Circulation 2011; 123: 14541485.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sommerville, J. Near misses and disasters in the treatment of grown-up congenital heart patients. J R Soc Med 1997; 90: 124127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerr, H, Price, J, Nicholl, H, O’Halloran, P. Transition from children’s to adult services for young adults with life-limiting conditions: a realist review of the literature. Int J Nurs Stud 2017; 76: 127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baumgartner, H, De Backer, J, Baby-Narayan, S, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the management of adult congenital heart disease. The task force for the management of adult congenital heart disease of the european society of cardiology. Eur Heart J 2021; 42: 563654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moons, P, Skogby, S, Bratt, EL, et al. Discontinuity of cardiac follow-up in young people with congenital heart disease transitioning to adulthood. A systemic review and meta-analysis. J Am Heart Assoc 2021; 10(6): e019552. DOI 10.1161/JAHA.120.019552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kipps, S, Bahu, T, Ong, T, et al. Current methods of transfer of young people with type 1 diabetes to adult services. Diabetes Med 2002; 19: 649654.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Plessis, KD, Peters, R, Culnane, E, d’Udekem, Y. Tranversing the liminal: what can Fontan adults’ transition expreiences and perspectives teach us about optimizing healthcare? Int J Adolesc Med Health 2018; 32(6). DOI 10.1515/ijamh-2018-0020.Google Scholar
Dorr Goold, S, Lipkin, M. The doctor-patient relationship: challenges, opportunities, and strategies. J Gen Intern Med 1999; 14: S26S33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Habibi, H, Emmanuel, Y, Chung, N. Process of transition for congenital heart patients: preventing loss to follow-up. Clin Nurse Spec 2017; 31: 329334.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dore, A, de Guise, P, Mercier, LA. Transition of care to adult congenital heart centres: what do patients know about their heart condition? Can J Cardiol 2002; 18: 141146.Google ScholarPubMed
Heery, E, Sheehan, AM, While, AE, Coyne, I. Experiences and outcomes of transition from pediatric to adult health care services for young people with congenital heart disease: a systemic review. Congenit Heart Dis 2015; 10: 413427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernandes, S, O’Sullivan-Oliveira, J, Landzberg, M, et al. Transition and transfer of adolescents and young adults with paediatric onset chronic disease: the patient and parents perspective. J Pediatr Rehabil Med 2014; 7: 4351.Google Scholar
Mackie, AS, Islam, S, Magill-Evans, J, et al. Healthcare transition for youth with heart disease: a clinical trial. Heart 2014; 100: 11131118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alexander, JA, Hearld, LR, Mittler, JN, Harvey, J. Patient-physician role relationship and patient activation among individuals with chronic illness. Health Serv Res 2012; 47: 12011223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Uzark, K, Wray, J. Young people with congenital heart disease- transitioning to adult care. Prog Pediatr Cardiol 2018; 48: 6874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar